![]() |
AFR in Closed Loop
Has anyone messed with the afr's in closed loop to increase MPG? I was reading on the mr2 forums that on closed loop they were running e85 as lean as 17 afr (on a wideband set for pump gas) to try to get some of the mpg back they lost. I don't know and think that i should run 93 pump that lean because egt would be high but i think we could run it leaner the 14.7 standard afr in closed loop fueling? Anyone try? I bet we could get close to 40 mpg?
|
I don't think you can set the CL fueling tables to leaner than 14.7. The only way to do it would be to offset the O2 sensor scaling.
|
1 Attachment(s)
For what it's worth, I did it a long time ago on a 2005 Legacy GT with an older version of Cobb Accesstuner. There were some tables labeled as closed loop target AFR on that version (this was before Bill from RomRaider joined Cobb and redid a bunch of stuff). I leaned it out enough to help gas mileage but not enough to cause misfire. I just dug up an old screenshot of a log I made.
http://www.ft86club.com/forums/attac...1&d=1396651773 |
Quote:
|
I talked to my turner friend and he said the only way he got it to work was to turn off O2 feed back. But this wasn't on an frs. I think he said it was on an older sti. The mr2 guys that were doing it didn't have the ability to change closed loop fueling but they could turn it off and run from just the fuel table. I would like to try and see if I can change closed loop and have it make a change.
|
Quote:
|
I tried to change the closed loop fueling table and nothing happened. AFR stayed at 14.7. I guess that table does nothing? The main fueling table can not be changed to anything higher then 14.7 ether. Only lower numbers are accepted.
|
Quote:
|
You would have to completely disable the factory closed loop system to do this. It is doable, I have not done any long term testing so I can not give a good answer on reliability.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
you can do this using the coolant temp based target offset tables. I forget the names right now. As others have said the closed loop target afr is not what the name would indicate and you cannot set a value leaner than 14.7 without error. I saw some strange fuel trim stack-up when i messed with it and have not bothered to try again. |
The more I learn about this car the less i seem to understand.
|
Thread revival. Thought that this is the best place for this. Having some wierd closed loop fueling issues that I've finally decided to tackle, seems like the ECU targets around 13.8 for a while before reverting to the CL fuel table target, which I have set mostly to 14.7. You can see in the graph below that the AFR tracks pretty well, but it always goes to 13.8 when changing to Fuel System Status 2.
Blue is Commanded AFR / Yellow is AFR https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/...ng%20Issue.gif This chart the load and RPM are not changing much, in fact the earlier part of the chart is at lower RPM and loads so should be hitting 14.7. I have tried changing the minimum open loop enrichment value and the closed loop targets are never that rich. Map is A02G I'm no running a rear O2 sensor, I wonder if that makes a difference? Ideas? |
Quote:
Certain, my closed loop fuelling is not targetting lower than 14.7 and temp comps are all set to 0 |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:16 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.