![]() |
Just want yall opinion on headlights and tailights
I own a stock Asphalt FR-S. I want to install foglights, headlights and tailights for my car. Foglights, the decision is between:
iJDMTOY Direct Clip-on Xenon White High Power LED Daytime Running Lights DRL Lamps or iJDMTOY JDM FT86 Style Complete Fog Light Kit with Bezel Cover, Wiring, Switch or OEM foglights. Since I live in NYC, i dont want to take a chance on headlights and tailights that are not DOT approved. For tailights, its either gonna be spyder or toms. The only thing i am unsure of is what color to get: either smoked, black, red or chrome. Any insight? I have been torn about this for a couple of weeks. Head lights will either be Winjet or Sypder. I would want the housing of the headlights to complement the the housing of the tailights. So, basically, what do you guys think I should do? |
Just FYI, I asked about the spyder tails and got responses that it's not DOT. Ft86speedfactory told me their only DOT tails are the Toms DOT version
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
This is the exact quote from @FT-86 SpeedFactory "[Originally Posted by cdo221 Hey, Are the spyder tail lights dot approved? http://ft86speedfactory.com/spyder-r...ghts-1096.html Or are the Toms the only dot approved tails you carry?] Technically, only the Tom's are DOT approved. " I know a lot of sites are advertising the Spyders at DOT legal but no confirmation from a reliable source. I trust @FT-86 SpeedFactory the most out of all the vendors on the forum. For example, Phastek listed the Spyders as DOT on their website. I messaged them to verify since it conflicted with what FT86SpeedFactory said ... Phastek never responded to me. |
Here's a video showing the side reflector light required for DOT tail lights:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...NrpS8ldME#t=74 If the Spyders have those, then you're probably good to go. If no side reflector light, then definitely not DOT approved. |
Hello everyone. Chris here. New to FT86 SpeedFactory, but not new to the 86 community.
I've had the Spyder tail lights on my vehicle since they were first available to the public. They are DOT stamped and stamped with an SAE number. The answer that was given to you in the PM probably stemmed from Tom's being one of the only manufacturers to make it a point to note which lights were DOT approved. I apologize for that not being the long winded answer. All you ever wanted to know about DOT regulations for lighting are on this page: http://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/rules-regul...px?reg=571.108 I've taken this excerpt from Grote.com. They are a manufacturer of vehicle safety systems for commercial vehicles (lights, reflectors, etc). Quote:
There are lights which don't have any markings on them. Valenti's don't if I recall correctly. We are not carrying those. It is my belief that Spyder has brought lights to the market which do conform to the standards within the US. The Spyder tail light does have reflex reflectors visible from the side and back. Also on their smoked lights, they don't go nearly as dark as the Valenti's or Winjets. They also never place the smoked lens over a black, non reflective housing. They only put it on the chrome versions. You'll notice that on both the headlights and tail lights. There are some extremely dark tail lights on the market which have DOT stamps on them. Whether or not they are legal for street use is not only regulated by the federal government, but you'll have to read up on your state department of public safety. From the Texas Department of Public Safety website: Quote:
Here's a picture where you can see the DOT and SAE markings on the Spyder tail lights... http://ft86speedfactory.com/images/x...ightDOTSAE.jpg |
Ah dang, sorry for the confusion caused by my posting haha. I wanted the red spyders initially but ended up buying the Toms due to the DOT stuff.
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:38 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.