| chrisl |
12-17-2013 11:38 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by cjsporl1996
(Post 1396729)
I think you would like the Monte Carlo. Coil overs, new swaybars, new adjustable upper and lower control arms at -1 degree camber in the front, slotted and ported rotors, track ready brake pads, rack and pinion steering box, Chevy 350 small block 420hp 460 torque, 3:73 gear, performance built 700r4, custom torque converter, 235/45/17 front and 245/45/17 rear. Probably more to list but I can't think of it.
|
Honestly, I doubt I would. No offense, but it's really not the kind of car I tend to enjoy driving. I like low, agile, lightweight, high-revving cars, preferably with a manual (or at least a fast-shifting, close-ratio dual clutch auto). That's pretty much everything the Monte Carlo isn't. I love the way the classic muscle cars look (and I have loved them ever since seeing pictures of my dad's second car - a yellow 1971 340 'Cuda), which makes me even sadder that I know I would never really enjoy driving one. Maybe if I'm rich enough someday to have a 5 or 6 (or more) car collection of fun cars, I could enjoy having a muscle car to take out from time to time, but as a car I would drive more often, I just really don't like the way they drive, and I don't love the look or straight line performance enough to make up for that shortfall.
|