![]() |
Lower Compression with Headgasket
So I was thinking. I know on the old 3sgte in the MR2 you could get thicker head gaskets to reduce the compression ratio. I know HKS has a head gasket set that lowers the compression ratio to 12.4 from 12.5. Would it be possible to lower the compression ratio down closer to 12.0 with a head gasket without other issues?
|
Might start running into issues with header fitment if you raise the effective deck height too much. Also if you start getting too thick you could potentially have a serious reliability issue with the gasket.
|
I don't see why it wouldn't be possible. At least that way, bumping the compression down would allow for a more knock tolerant 350-400whp.
However, it's doing nothing to strengthen the rods, obviously. The rods will are always the weak point in a high revving high compression JDM motor. They make them as light as they can to make the engine rev. I'm not knocking the idea at all. I think its a good way to build in a bit of fat with regards to knock threshold. However it's not the same as a built motor, is the point I'm making. |
Now that is old school,
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It's the intake manifold which will be more difficult. |
Quote:
|
It would be a hell of a lot easier to do rods and pistons than to reinvent a header and intake manifold. So the idea of cheaply lowering the compression with a head gasket is just straight limited at best
|
I was talking about pump gas being the limiting factor to 300whp, because of the compression.
Where as if it were lower compression, you could push it further to 400whp, just like any sti motor, sr20, 3sg, 4g63, rb20, 1g, fj, I could go on. Regarding the rods, yes there maybe people pushing more than that, but for how long? One thing in some of these builds favour is the lag of the turbo. Running an early spooling turbo that can make 400whp or more, like a gtx2867r or a efr7163 and you're putting even more strain on the rods. |
Quote:
But for most of us, that would be paying either way, you defintely have a point. Still going to be much cheaper to modify manifolds than to buy a built short block. |
I'd be curious about the length of the timing belts (chains I think, but either way) and how far off the cam timing would be when adding that much to the gasket thickness.
Anyone know the combustion chamber volume so we can do some calculations to find out how much deck height we'd need to add, otherwise this is just pure speculation. |
I did not have the time at work to calculate the size head gasket to decrease the compression ratio by X amount. I didn't even think about the manifolds lining up right as an issue because I am used to inline 4's and 6's. Maybe that is why the HKS only drop the CR by 0.1?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
That would be my guess. Boxer engine is kinda tied to one spot
|
Quote:
Personally, I think increasing the head gasket thickness on a 12:1 compression ratio engine is just asking for trouble. humfrz |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:43 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.