Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB

Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/index.php)
-   Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   Official: Toyota FT-1 Concept / First New Supra Prototype Spotted! (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=53322)

Guff 01-09-2017 12:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by darthpnoy1984 (Post 2827929)
One thought I wanna add is Toyota should reexplore bringing back the inline 6 how about rework the 2JZ to meet today's emissions and have them twin turbos with direct injection for thr GS, LS and RC coupe.

Fun fact: Toyota made a direct injected version of the 2JZ in Naturally Aspirated form. It was called the 2JZ-FSE. I have been trying to source one for quite some time now, but they have proved quite elusive.

That's all.

vh_supra26 01-09-2017 10:42 AM

Maybe they will use this on the new Supra?

Quote:

Toyota's New twin-turbo V6

Surprisingly, though, the LS doesn't use the LC's powertrain. Under the hood is a completely new twin-turbocharged 3.5-liter V6 that pumps out 415 horsepower and 442 lb-ft of torque. That puts it down on power, but ahead in torque compared with the LC's V8. It's also significantly more than the previous LS' V8, and Lexus predicts it will be capable of a 0-60 mph time of 4.5 seconds with rear-wheel drive. A Lexus PR representative also said the LS is only being released with the V6. We doubt it would be hard to drop one in later though if Lexus saw demand.
http://www.autoblog.com/2017/01/09/2...o-v6-redesign/

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-VO4kD8Jic...s-LS-18-33.jpg

Re_Invention 01-09-2017 12:27 PM

Yeah I imagine a corporate TTV6 would be the hot ticket but who knows - I didn't think Toyota/Lexus would maintain a screaming V8 this long. I just read an interesting article by Eddie Alterman in the latest C&D which suggests with the new administration coming in (Trump is pro-business, obviously) we could see a stalwart by the the Big three lobbying the regulatory path of CAFE for 2025 to attain the 55 mpg average. Alterman suggests that may allow for for more adventurous up-sizing in engines and consumer preferences for bigger=better. But I'm not so sure it'll be as easy this time around especially with oil pricing volatility and global market pressures to homogenize product type which is likely supporting top line profits. In other words, I still think F/I will supplement displacement for the foreseeable automotive future. But EV tech, or more specifically manufacture IP leasing, will likely dwindle.

Maybe we'll get some more 5.0L+ engines back into the market place :happyanim:

strat61caster 01-09-2017 02:11 PM

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BMW_B58

krayzie 01-09-2017 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by daiheadjai (Post 2827174)
Toyota tried to use the Paseo to get youth to buy, but it was just a miserable rebadged/reskinned Tercel.

They definitely had a better reskinned Tercel before that.

https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images...vH_400x400.png

daiheadjai 01-10-2017 10:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by krayzie (Post 2828747)
They definitely had a better reskinned Tercel before that.

https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images...vH_400x400.png

Lambo doors embiggen the smallest car.

Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk

RRnold 01-11-2017 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vh_supra26 (Post 2828103)

I think that would be a good Plan B alternative. However, I think Toyota should stick to I6 TT like the current M3.

m.box.design 01-11-2017 05:04 PM

The new camry might imply how the design of the Supra nose may look like. https://scontent.fsnc1-1.fna.fbcdn.n...70&oe=58DD208A

vh_supra26 01-11-2017 06:11 PM

I'm thinking it will be closer to the face lift 86.

http://www.supramkv.com/attachments/...ype5-jpg.1020/
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/igkiqsyr9Vk/maxresdefault.jpg

krayzie 01-11-2017 06:15 PM

I just hope they do away with that stupid plastic engine cover.

gymratter 01-12-2017 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RRnold (Post 2830098)
I think that would be a good Plan B alternative. However, I think Toyota should stick to I6 TT like the current M3.

really? i thought a Toyota motor would make y'all happy. i recall that was a huge complaint with the 86 from purists.

RRnold 01-12-2017 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gymratter (Post 2830883)
really? i thought a Toyota motor would make y'all happy. i recall that was a huge complaint with the 86 from purists.

A Toyota V6TT would a good choice. I'm hoping that Toyota wouldn't cut corners on this project, esp the engine and keep it true to it's roots since they plan to call it a Supra. To me, I'm not holding my breath that much any more since this is another Toyota partnership for cost cutting.

When the FT86 was still in development, my complaints were the continuous GT-S references that never made it to the GT86. Specifically the engine, the Subie collaboration and production at FHI, no hatchback and the decision to brand it as a Scion.

That's just my opinion though.

Pbrown 01-12-2017 08:49 PM

My question
 
Do we see it this year? New York auto show maybe? Makes sense to me. Camry(sportier for sure) release at Detroit, FT-1 at New York. I think they should keep the FT-1 name to go along with the GT 86.

gymratter 01-16-2017 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RRnold (Post 2826763)
That's very old.

oh my bad.

this one is ok too me.

http://www.supramkv.com/attachments/...rear-jpg.1095/
http://www.supramkv.com/attachments/...2new-jpg.1085/


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:16 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.


Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.