![]() |
Quote:
|
I installed the setup per original write up (I think) and I’m noticing zero difference and looking at what I’ve done, it makes no sense either. It’s essentially running in parallel to the heater core return line?
Somebody correct me if I’m understanding this wrong. EDIT: Nevermind, oil this oil cooler makes such a small difference you won’t be able to see it without data logging. Source, this thread: http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=93127 Also, Vibrant Performance 11417 works well for the M14x1.5 to hose barb fitting. |
Options for the barb fitting without using adapters:
http://www.jegs.com/i/Vibrant-Perfor...11417/10002/-1 http://www.jegs.com/i/JEGS-Performan...00478/10002/-1 |
What is the consensus on throttle body routing vs parallel to the heater core routing?
Guessing I dont need the adapter fitting if the throttle body routing is used. Throttle body routing looks a lot simpler and looking at the link on page 40 it works well. |
2 Attachment(s)
Looking through the pictures on this thread, it looks like there are two ways that the Forester water pipe is being positioned. Just wondering which one is the correct way?
Fitment A or Fitment B? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
If anyone doesn’t want their old coolant pipe then hit me up. I’m doing a project and could use the pipe. It saves me a trip to the junk yard.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
So, is the Ned oil cooler kit the same thing..As the Forester XT part # 21317AA070 and #21311AA170?
|
Quote:
|
Ho guys, I would like to mount this system in my car and would like to know if this fitting is correct! it's made of steel, and I think it's better than aluminum. confirm?
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/273563943419 Thank you. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:53 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.