![]() |
Quote:
(Clean as in tasteful, not clean as in dirtless). |
Quote:
Is this wing clean? http://www.xplosiveperformance.com/a.../as-206157.jpg What about this one? http://racerlist.com/images/83200-72...0421003557.jpg Or this one? http://i.ebayimg.com/t/REAL-CARBON-F...1o9Q~~60_3.JPG And, finally, this one. http://i.ebayimg.com/t/Universal-56-...!LQw~~60_3.JPG |
Quote:
rawrrrr http://www.darklygaming.com/images/fapfap.png |
Quote:
Now obviously, if the car is a dedicated track car, then those wings clearly aren't rice. But here's the thing. There ix really no way to tell if a car on the road is driven at a track or not. However, based on my first hand experiences, the vast majority of cars on the road with big wings are purely for show and not actual use. Therefore, in most cases, big wings on road cars is rice. This is why I consider most wings on DD's ricey, even if a small percentage of them are actually seeing functional use. The sad thing about all of that is... I'll eventually get an aero kit at some point (including wing) because I will be ocassionally tracking the car on a daily driver. Most people are gonna think I'm a ricer... Good thing I could care less what others think of me.:lol: |
You guys, there is no definition of rice, only the emotions it provokes. It is an abstract. More of a philosophical concept than a physical one.
Like love, there are multiple versions of rice. 1. Non-functional/Pointless RICE. 2. Garish/Inappropriate/Tacky RICE. 3. Deluded RICE (aka F&F RICE, random "What were they thinking?!" RICE). 4. Cheap/Knockoff RICE. It can be all of these things or just one of them. Or none. For example: This is garish and can be considered RICE under rule 2, but not under rule 1 because of its supposed functionality (and who doesn't love this car): http://www.englishforum.ch/attachmen...rbird-64ii.jpg These can qualify as RICE under rules 1 and 4, but not 2 and 3, because while the functionality and originality of the look are lost, they are still not ugly, and definitely not random: http://www.kinghorngarage.co.uk/rota-wheels.jpg Functional? Maybe. Cheap? No no no. Garish? Hells yeah: http://i498.photobucket.com/albums/r...cerJaguar2.jpg Finally, a clear qualifier for rule 3 (I would consider $1 expensive for this mod, so I suppose it doesn't adhere to rule 4): http://www.team-bhp.com/forum/attach...ricer48377.jpg This is why the typical rice mods are stickers and Pep Boys spoilers. They fit into almost all the categories. Stickers are non-functional, often tacky, pointless, and usually cheap. Spoilers from Pep Boys often reduce functionality, very tacky/garish, are usually inappropriate for the vehicle they are on, some put on with little to no thought about the car it goes on, and and cheap, often knockoffs of the well developed racing spoilers. Discuss. :popcorn: |
Ah nothing like a bit of good rice.
|
You need a certain attitude for it to be rice. This isn't rice:
Attached Imageshttp://www.ft86club.com/forums/attac...1&d=1383681981 Until you add this: Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.n...74713986_o.jpg
exhaust tips behind chicken wire provides dat super aerodynamics |
1 Attachment(s)
Rice or not?
This is the picture of one of the FT86's member. Here is his/her build thread http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=40634 |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:28 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.