![]() |
looks good! I think I will try this soon!
|
Modifying the snorkel will yield NO real world benefit under circuit conditions. Buy a direct ram air snorkel to replace the stock one. U will feel a benefit from that at speed.
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Hey guys, FRS driver here. I see all of the snorkel mods, nice. Anyway, I tried something similar and noticed a huge drop in torque down low, off the line. I drive an AT out of neccessity not choice. Anyway if you just punch it from a stop or under 1500 rpms with the oversized snorkel it will bog and the car will barely move. Rpms slowly climb to 2000 and the car gets going like normal. Anyway, I liked the extra pull up top so instead of abandoning the idea I designed a system that maximizes torque down low and still allows the car to breathe freely up top. I am not vendor status yet but, I have already made a request. Soon I will post pics and videos of the system in operation. I am also looking for a stock MT and stock AT to get a free intake upgrade and dyno session here in the North Bay. So before you pull the trigger on a $300 snorkel you may want to wait and see what I have. There really isn't anything like it out there. I hope to offer this unit right around the $50 range but, without a minimum order for reduced build costs the price sits at $65 right now. I believe that my unit will out perform most if not all snorkels on the market throughout the entire rpm range. This is a quality built unit, factory looks. I hope to have some videos up by mid week. Thanks.
|
Quote:
I also went on to say that placement is key for a ram air-styled intake, however the issue is that all of the optimal placement locations are in direct path of where water would hit the filter. Airflow at speed isn't the only important thing to consider, 99.9% of drivers use their cars on the street as well, and heat soak in traffic is an issue. If it were a track car only and the car would never see rain, I would definitely have a ram air snorkel in my front grill. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
^ lol then what were you even arguing about? the 1% of cases that people would benefit?
|
Quote:
|
http://img.tapatalk.com/d/14/07/15/6uhagy8a.jpghttp://img.tapatalk.com/d/14/07/15/2ejagety.jpg
If I understand right the air flow on twins comes from bottom of the car, .. ..so why open the snorkel @FRont side, but not bottom?? Another choice is: combine bottom opening with direct tube from the front of the car, but this requires cutting… Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk 4 |
[QUOTE=EZx2;1846725]http://img.tapatalk.com/d/14/07/15/6uhagy8a.jpghttp://img.tapatalk.com/d/14/07/15/2ejagety.jpg
If I understand right the air flow on twins comes from bottom of the car, .. ..so why open the snorkel @FRont side, but not bottom?? Because most people don't understand how air flows in, around, and under an automobile at speed. They don't understand what the radiused opening of the stock snorkel is for, and how the area in front of the radiator basically becomes a giant airbox at speed. It really doesn't matter which way you face the snorkel opening. Grimmspeed found through testing that the stock snorkel was not a restriction, and I think Cosworth found the same thing., that the stock intake system was good to around 300 HP. |
I recommend a "real" ram air setup as well. But they are expensive as fuck still.
I just wanted more noise and a bigger opening for lowering the ambient air temps. Whether or not it increases actual air flow would require more testing than I can do. But I have run "ram air" style "real race car" intakes before, but require more filter maintenance and caution in various weather. Quote:
|
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:48 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.