![]() |
Quote:
EDIT: actually I just looked back at the AFR, and I think it tells some of the story. AFR is going up in the torque dip range, which means it's a volumetric efficiency issue I think, so the intake tuning theory sounds plausible (Subaru boxer engines all have a manifold like that, makes sense that they'd all see the same drop like that). Below 3000rpm it runs quite rich, that looks like the extra fuel they're using to combat the internal EGR effect of advancing the intake cams. The high end being so rich is a mystery though... |
Quote:
Jeff |
So, no 93 gas in Oregon? Why would you dyno a car not on gas required for top performance?
|
Quote:
Because it's a realistic street spec dyno? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
with the ECU being open, its just a matter of time before a free maps end up here on the forums, cracking an ECU is no longer required so the cost is not justified, I can see ECU maps floating around for free or less then 50$ with AFR, and a good map, super chagers and turbos should be a snap.
|
Quote:
Jeff |
The manual actually says 93 is recommended, 91 is fine but may have slightly decreased performance.
|
Yes I see that now.
Jeff |
I'm shocked nobody's mentioned it yet but:
WHAT KIND OF DYNO ARE THEY USING? That makes a bit of difference when you compare it to other people's dynos. Also the altitude/air density would be useful to know, too. |
Agreed, that information is good to know, along with knowing if they are corrected or uncorrected values.
Jeff |
Quote:
Never mind, I'm glad I went to the auto show... |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:26 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.