| extrashaky |
10-12-2017 11:40 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by BaatLuk
(Post 2991331)
Btw, technically US federal regulation requires amber lenses on side markers
|
I've seen this thrown out there a few times, and I don't think it's correct. Vehicle lighting is governed at the federal level by FMVSS 108. I've been through it, and I don't see anywhere that it says that amber lenses are required. S7.4.2 says that the "color of light" must conform to Table 1-a. Table 1-a requires two front steady burning amber side markers and two rear steady burning red side markers. If you have amber bulbs in your clear front side markers, the color of light would be amber, and you would be in compliance. Plus using amber lamps to avoid impairing other drivers' night vision is just simple courtesy.
By that same regulation, JDM tail lights, which lack the red rear side markers, would be illegal.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sarlacc
(Post 2989174)
Those sidemarkers are clear and set up as turn signals from the factory on all GT86 and BRZ in Japan, Europe and most or all markets except North America.
So I always assumed it was some US legislation requiring the amber lens and different wiring.
|
Table 1-a of FMVSS specifically states:
Side Marker Lamps
2 Amber
On each side as far to the front as practicable
Steady burning except may be flashed for signaling purposes. Must be activated when the headlamps are activated in a steady burning state or the parking lamps on passenger cars and MPVs, trucks, and buses less than 80 inches in overall width are activated. So it's legal to have side markers that flash with your turn signals, as long as they also conform to the other requirements.
|