Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB

Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/index.php)
-   FR-S / BRZ vs.... (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=25)
-   -   caliber srt4 (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=41247)

Silverdub 07-10-2013 09:07 PM

caliber srt4
 
geez I didn't know they were that fast out of the box... but im still faster..just sayin, not by a whole lot but faster.. I am really impressed by the caliber!

sofrsnsokleen 07-10-2013 09:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Silverdub (Post 1059611)
geez I didn't know they were that fast out of the box... but im still faster..just sayin, not by a whole lot but faster.. I am really impressed by the caliber!

the fr-s is faster??the caliber has a lot more hp and torque. anyways, i think its the ugliest sporty car ever made. they could've literally made it with 500hp and 10000 torque and I still wouldn't have ever considered it.

fatoni 07-10-2013 09:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sofrsnsokleen (Post 1059646)
the fr-s is faster??the caliber has a lot more hp and torque. anyways, i think its the ugliest sporty car ever made. they could've literally made it with 500hp and 10000 torque and I still wouldn't have ever considered it.

the dude is not riding in a stock frs

Silverdub 07-10-2013 09:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sofrsnsokleen (Post 1059646)
the fr-s is faster??the caliber has a lot more hp and torque. anyways, i think its the ugliest sporty car ever made. they could've literally made it with 500hp and 10000 torque and I still wouldn't have ever considered it.

click my sig and understand why its faster... stock it obviously isn't and by far

6speed_Sam 07-11-2013 10:51 PM

I have not really kept up with Dodges much besides my '86 turbo Daytona I just sold.. How quick are the calibers? And how do they compare to the turbo pt cruisers?

I walked a turbo pt in my frs. Pretty damn bad. And I had a passenger. And mine was bone stock.

thill 07-12-2013 12:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 6speed_Sam (Post 1063014)
I have not really kept up with Dodges much besides my '86 turbo Daytona I just sold.. How quick are the calibers? And how do they compare to the turbo pt cruisers?

I walked a turbo pt in my frs. Pretty damn bad. And I had a passenger. And mine was bone stock.

They make 285hp and have 265ft lbs of torque. They also weight about 3200lbs, are FWD and have gobs of torque steer, and handle poorly.

And I think they are butt ugly. In a straight line they are pretty quick. But that is about all they have going for them.

6speed_Sam 07-12-2013 01:40 AM

ok that's right. I forgot they made that kind of power. You're right.. very ugly

WolfpackS2k 07-12-2013 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Silverdub (Post 1059611)
geez I didn't know they were that fast out of the box... but im still faster..just sayin, not by a whole lot but faster.. I am really impressed by the caliber!

There's nothing super impressive about them. In fact despite being considerably more powerful they are slower in every way compared to their predecessor, the Neon SRT4.

STV3 07-12-2013 10:32 AM

The Caliber SRT-4 stock is a mid to low 14 sec car in the quarter. They only made the SRT model for 2 years I believe and they can be OK cars I guess. I think one just broke into the 10s. I personally am not a fan. I have a Neon SRT-4 and would never want that huge thing lol

CBR600RR 07-12-2013 10:37 AM

"At the Track
Dodge says the SRT-4 is good for 0-60 times in the "low 6-second range" and we verified that claim. Our car hit 60 in 6.2 seconds and went on to complete the quarter-mile in 14.6 seconds at 100 mph. The last Mazdaspeed 3 we tested was 0.1 second quicker in both tests. Launches were hampered by the "bog or boil" effect, where the engine either falls on its face or the tires spin uncontrollably. This is likely a drawback of the inertial effects of heavy wheels and tires."


Quoted from here: http://www.edmunds.com/dodge/caliber...road-test.html

this is barely faster than the stock FR-S

when mine was stock I ran the 1/4 in 14.72, and I calculated a 0-60 at 6.2

STV3 07-12-2013 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WolfpackS2k (Post 1063907)
There's nothing super impressive about them. In fact despite being considerably more powerful they are slower in every way compared to their predecessor, the Neon SRT4.

Yeah I dont know what Chrysler was thinking when they decided to make that car. It was such a fail, especially considering how well the Neon SRT-4 did.

HunterGreene 07-12-2013 10:43 AM

The SRT-4 Caliber killed interest in the SRT brand.

Yes, it was fast in a straight line, but if you attempted to take a turn, (exaggeration incoming), the car would bow, roll, and explode.

Dodge desperately needs to release a good, solid SRT-4 Dart, and needed to do it yesterday.

leon78 07-12-2013 10:45 AM

Mazdaspeed3....that is all.

HunterGreene 07-12-2013 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by leon78 (Post 1063995)
Mazdaspeed3....that is all.

This also helped kill it.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:05 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.


Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.