![]() |
313HP per liter, super charged and turbo charged (C-X75)
Swooooooon
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=fqqJs0mqH9M"]The Jaguar C-X75 Prototype - YouTube[/ame] |
Wow. (I would say more, but I think that sums it up nicely)
|
That rev limit sounds like 11k ish...my jaw dropped when I listened to it.
|
Lets see... WANT!
|
I thought the C-X75 was squashed? At least that's what was reported several months ago. Only a handful of prototypes were made.
|
Quote:
For some reason i'm doubting the reliability of that 1.6, being that its so highly strung. |
http://jalopnik.com/5967525/jaaaaag-...ow-were-crying
Dead as of the end of last year...too bad, a 1.6L twin-charged 4 pot spinning to 10K sounds like sex. |
While the 1.6 is pretty amazing, I still the original was better where the 4 wheels were driven by electric motors and the car used twin micro turbines as generators.
Yup.. Twin Freakin' Micro turbines and the car put down over 1000hp with the 4 electric motors. |
Quote:
@Trashed675 Yea I doubt the reliability of a boosted 11k rpm engine, but then again they probably have titanium-everything-moving and motorcycles that spin faster don't. |
Quote:
For the audience following along... Here's the original concept with the dual micro turbines. The original C-X75 concept: [ame="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qaF9iYw--QI"]Jaguar C-X75 Electric-Turbine Concept - YouTube[/ame] |
Quote:
In short the Jaguar C-X75 engine is a 100% F1 engine built by Cosworth. In the C-X75 it is detuned, in F1 spec it makes more than 700 PS and has 15.000 RPM redline. |
Makes one wonder what the longevity of that 1.6 would be...
|
Quote:
|
Beautiful. Exciting. Everything a concept should be.
Edit: And I cringe at it's complexities. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:10 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.