Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB

Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/index.php)
-   Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   Manual tranny takes another step into oblivion (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3888)

Maxim 02-25-2012 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brufleth (Post 142060)
Everyone sort of seems to be ignoring this post. Maybe because heel toe isn't something people usually do on a daily basis. What just about anyone with a manual does do a daily basis is shift ahead of turns, use their engine to slow them down instead of just braking, and skips gears. These simple behaviors make even good semi-autos with flappy paddles or whatever seem annoying to me. I'm either counting taps trying to get into the right gear or bumping readline when I down shift going into a corner, or find myself relying on the brakes way more.

If you're drag racing maybe a good auto might be better just because shift time is all that matters. If you're actually driving a car no amount of shifting speed is going to make up for the fact that the car can only base gear choice on some basic information.

Yeah absolutely! Hell, I practice heel/toeing on the road all the time. If I'm in traffic I'll just clutch in and downshift without braking, and ease the clutch back and engine brake, but if I'm driving around, especially somewhere remote, I heel/toe before corners. It's just a good way to practice.

The worst thing about automatics is that even the performance ones, with good programming, aren't good at holding a gear at high RPM and part-throttle. The most common time that somebody would want to remain at high RPM and part throttle is around a corner....the absolute worst time to inadvertently shift gears.

LSxJunkie 02-25-2012 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by madfast (Post 141808)
yes. but the significance is the fact that they are doing this from the factory to begin with. it represents a first step towards performance automatics. yes the ZL1 is a musclecar, but is it that big of a stretch that the ZR1 may see an auto in the very near future? perhaps because of the AT ZL1's success? and is it a stretch to see the GT500 get an auto to compete? and the BOSS 302? and the Viper to compete with the ZR1 or next gen Vette? the ZL1 getting a good auto is significant imo, because everything i said above is not that far fetched if you consider MT's account for less than 10% of sales...

Yes. The ZR1 is a sports car. The blower is heavy enough and way out front. They don't want to add another hundred pounds of transmission to the back of the car.

And the Boss 302 is almost a pure track car. Ask any Boss 302 owner that actually tracks their cars. They neither want or need an automatic. I've driven one, and I've driven a regular GT Brembo. The Boss 302 would not feel right with a torque converter automatic. And clutchpack/planetary automatics really don't like being spun up to 7500. The IS-F runs a corporate 8-speed transmission developed for a 70k car, and redlines at 6800. Ford is not going to dump the money to develop that transmission. This argument applies below as well.

Plus, Ford isn't going to put an automatic in it because if you want a 420hp Mustang with an automatic, buy a GT Brembo. They could put one in the GT500, but I can tell you that that transmission is going to be expensive. It has to handle 600lbs/ft of torque, spin up to at least 190mph, be able to take some hard abuse and not overheat. And they have to be willing to warranty that transmission, so its in their best interest to overbuild it to keep from having to pay out big warranty claims.

Quote:

Originally Posted by brufleth (Post 142060)
Everyone sort of seems to be ignoring this post. Maybe because heel toe isn't something people usually do on a daily basis. What just about anyone with a manual does do a daily basis is shift ahead of turns, use their engine to slow them down instead of just braking, and skips gears. These simple behaviors make even good semi-autos with flappy paddles or whatever seem annoying to me. I'm either counting taps trying to get into the right gear or bumping readline when I down shift going into a corner, or find myself relying on the brakes way more.

If you're drag racing maybe a good auto might be better just because shift time is all that matters. If you're actually driving a car no amount of shifting speed is going to make up for the fact that the car can only base gear choice on some basic information.

I heel-toed every day I drove stick. And I do now whenever I find myself in a stick car. That's where the fun in driving a stick car lies for me. However, it wasn't ever for engine braking. It was to be in the sweet spot of the powerband to come out of the corner.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maxim (Post 142065)
Yeah absolutely! Hell, I practice heel/toeing on the road all the time. If I'm in traffic I'll just clutch in and downshift without braking, and ease the clutch back and engine brake, but if I'm driving around, especially somewhere remote, I heel/toe before corners. It's just a good way to practice.

The worst thing about automatics is that even the performance ones, with good programming, aren't good at holding a gear at high RPM and part-throttle. The most common time that somebody would want to remain at high RPM and part throttle is around a corner....the absolute worst time to inadvertently shift gears.

In their defense, the IS-F automatic uses the torque converter like a clutch. When you've commanded a gear, it will hold that gear (unless you slow down too much, then the trans will downshift to keep from stalling). I drove an IS-F around a road course. It held gears at very high rpm when I was using the paddles. Never wanted to upshift. This is, supposedly, the same trans tune that is going into the FR-S/BRZ (with a 6spd version of that trans).

Guff 02-25-2012 11:23 AM

You'd think, since they are designing Camaros and this "TapShift" stuff, that they would have the means to not film with a bloody potato.


I can't take it seriously.

SVTSHC 02-25-2012 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brufleth (Post 142060)
Everyone sort of seems to be ignoring this post. Maybe because heel toe isn't something people usually do on a daily basis. What just about anyone with a manual does do a daily basis is shift ahead of turns, use their engine to slow them down instead of just braking, and skips gears. These simple behaviors make even good semi-autos with flappy paddles or whatever seem annoying to me. I'm either counting taps trying to get into the right gear or bumping readline when I down shift going into a corner, or find myself relying on the brakes way more.

If you're drag racing maybe a good auto might be better just because shift time is all that matters. If you're actually driving a car no amount of shifting speed is going to make up for the fact that the car can only base gear choice on some basic information.

I actually heel toe on a daily basis =/.

madfast 02-25-2012 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maxim (Post 142035)
So your image is telling me that more accidents happen in densely populated areas where there are more vehicles on the road.....

no, it was to illustrate that there are still a shit ton of accidents and deaths despite the supposed notion that "MT drivers are more attentive".

Quote:

My insurance company seems to agree. They charge noticably less for the manual transmission version of cars. *shrug*
that doesnt mean anything. it could just be that MT is cheaper to replace. using insurance rates as a metric for safety is useless.

Quote:

The simple fact is learning to drive a manual transmission takes longer and if somebody can't learn to do that, then they shouldn't be behind the wheel. In a manual, you're always doing more than one thing at once. In an auto, drivers are more likely to be using their free hand for something distracting. If you deny people who cannot drive a manual transmission a license, then you are taking at least some of the people off the road who are just not suited to a complex task that has the potential to kill people.
in theory. but are there any statistics to prove this point? who's to say i cant use my free hand IN BETWEEN SHIFTS in a MT??? how long does it take to get distracted and crash? split second? MT driver cant get distracted between shifts?

i see your point, and on some level i agree, but lets be honest. driving MT isnt some super hard skill that takes all your concentration to do. people can get distracted just as easily. it's about the PEOPLE, not the machine. forcing people to learn MT may prevent the worst of the worst from driving, but that aint saying much... the real problem is the entitlement americans feel about driving. that it's their right to do so, not a privilege. i whole heartedly agree that it should be harder to get a license, but the notion that MT forces you to be a better driver, or that only good drivers can drive MT, is beyond flawed...

Quote:

Originally Posted by LSxJunkie (Post 142082)
Yes. The ZR1 is a sports car. The blower is heavy enough and way out front. They don't want to add another hundred pounds of transmission to the back of the car.

And the Boss 302 is almost a pure track car. Ask any Boss 302 owner that actually tracks their cars. They neither want or need an automatic. I've driven one, and I've driven a regular GT Brembo. The Boss 302 would not feel right with a torque converter automatic. And clutchpack/planetary automatics really don't like being spun up to 7500. The IS-F runs a corporate 8-speed transmission developed for a 70k car, and redlines at 6800. Ford is not going to dump the money to develop that transmission. This argument applies below as well.

Plus, Ford isn't going to put an automatic in it because if you want a 420hp Mustang with an automatic, buy a GT Brembo. They could put one in the GT500, but I can tell you that that transmission is going to be expensive. It has to handle 600lbs/ft of torque, spin up to at least 190mph, be able to take some hard abuse and not overheat. And they have to be willing to warranty that transmission, so its in their best interest to overbuild it to keep from having to pay out big warranty claims.

if it makes them a ton of money, they'll do it. and im not talking about just AT. im talking about the ZL1 AT being a stepping stone for better automatics, including DCTs and AMTs, in the future.

tranzformer 02-25-2012 03:13 PM

madfast, why you so mad? What do you have against MT?

madfast 02-25-2012 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tranzformer (Post 142215)
madfast, why you so mad? What do you have against MT?

LOL i dont have anything against MT. i love driving MT as much as the next guy, but i do have a problem with people who are anti-AT. most of them are just plain ignorant, and follow the immature enthusiast sentiment that you are not a true enthusiast if you dont drive stick. now dont get me wrong im not saying that's the case in this thread, but in general that sentiment is rife and abundant in the automotive world...

with this thread specifically, i was just reporting that continued development of the AT really will kill off the MT in the near future. just like people who ride horses as a means of transportation, mostly they do it for fun. just like people who jet their own carbs, they do it for fun. and in the future, people will drive MT, for fun...

SUB-FT86 02-25-2012 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tranzformer (Post 142215)
madfast, why you so mad? What do you have against MT?

He doesn't have anything against manuals IMO. He comes off to me as somebody who is open minded vs the manual or die crowd. Why is it that automatic drivers are lazy? I guarantee you a lot of the CEO's and hard working people drive automatics. I think the real question is why the manual-only crowd is so fucking mad?

SUB-FT86 02-25-2012 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by madfast (Post 142223)
LOL i dont have anything against MT. i love driving MT as much as the next guy, but i do have a problem with people who are anti-AT. most of them are just plain ignorant, and follow the immature enthusiast sentiment that you are not a true enthusiast if you dont drive stick. now dont get me wrong im not saying that's the case in this thread, but in general that sentiment is rife and abundant in the automotive world...

with this thread specifically, i was just reporting that continued development of the AT really will kill off the MT in the near future. just like people who ride horses as a means of transportation, mostly they do it for fun. just like people who jet their own carbs, they do it for fun. and in the future, people will drive MT, for fun...

Well said!!!!!

Exage 02-25-2012 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SUB-FT86 (Post 142253)
Why is it that automatic drivers are lazy? I guarantee you a lot of the CEO's and hard working people drive automatics. I think the real question is why the manual-only crowd is so fucking mad?

There is a notion of I "need" an automatic. It's terrible.

There are people that actually do need one, the really hard working people... say the ones that lost their limbs fighting for their country, or born with a similar and very unfortunate case.

The biggest is the city or traffic "need". If I can take my car around the city or slow moving highway then a similar perfectly well functioning human being could too. Similar story with "hills", (I live on a 22% grade), and with "I haven't learned how" (I started driving on a 3-speed auto). Those are excuses for "need".

If you say that you "want" an automatic then it's a bit of a different story. That's where I believe the Automatic=Lazy attitude spans from.

(In all honesty I do mean this in a light [somewhat joking] sense of a post before people go all haywire on me, don't take it too seriously)

madfast 02-25-2012 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exage (Post 142298)
The biggest is the city or traffic "need". If I can take my car around the city or slow moving highway then a similar perfectly well functioning human being could too. Similar story with "hills", (I live on a 22% grade), and with "I haven't learned how" (I started driving on a 3-speed auto). Those are excuses for "need".

http://blogs.insideline.com/roadtest...477-114323.jpg
http://blogs.insideline.com/roadtest...477-114331.jpg

http://blogs.insideline.com/roadtest...utomatics.html

for all you MT enthusiasts out there, god bless you if you can stand this everyday... :bow:

i understand your post was semi in jest, but alas there are people out there who think like this for real...

Exage 02-25-2012 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by madfast (Post 142325)
for all you MT enthusiasts out there, god bless you if you can stand this everyday... :bow:

If I did, would that shoot me to driving god status?;);)

Hell I would just walk, It's faster then any car at that speed.

SUB-FT86 02-25-2012 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exage (Post 142298)
There is a notion of I "need" an automatic. It's terrible.

There are people that actually do need one, the really hard working people... say the ones that lost their limbs fighting for their country, or born with a similar and very unfortunate case.

The biggest is the city or traffic "need". If I can take my car around the city or slow moving highway then a similar perfectly well functioning human being could too. Similar story with "hills", (I live on a 22% grade), and with "I haven't learned how" (I started driving on a 3-speed auto). Those are excuses for "need".

If you say that you "want" an automatic then it's a bit of a different story. That's where I believe the Automatic=Lazy attitude spans from.

(In all honesty I do mean this in a light [somewhat joking] sense of a post before people go all haywire on me, don't take it too seriously)

I understand where you are coming from 100%. My reason for not being a manual only person isn't because I am lazy. It's because I hate the clutch with a passion. If manuals never had clutches my car would be a manual right now. I still love to shift and that's why I like Sporty Autos/DCT transmissions. My auto rarely stays in auto mode so I am putting effort towards having some form of control and fun in my car. Unfortunately my auto isn't geared sporty enough and doesn't have the torque converter lock-up feature so I know the FR-S tranny will be amazing since I like mines a little bit.

ichitaka05 02-25-2012 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dimman (Post 141839)
What they should keep manuals for is for testing for your license. No manual ability, no license. If you can't operate a damn manual (due to laziness rather than disability) how the hell can you operate the whole rest of the car? God, how much better the roads would be...

Japan has 2 different licenses for cars. AT only and MT/AT


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:01 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.


Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.