![]() |
Cusco vs Stance (Rear Control Arms)
Hi Guys,
Did some searching and I'm sure this is not a re-post but please correct me if I'm wrong. I am looking at getting a Rear Control Arms for my car and just wanted to know what is the better out of the below two. If I'm going to spend the money for a Rear Control Arm, I want the best of the best. My question is... what is your Control Arm of choice and why??? Please exclude price from this comparison. I want the comparison do be on the product itself eg; quality and functionality (price is not a factor). Cusco - 692 474 L http://ft86speedfactory.com/images/692474L.JPG Stance - ST44 http://ft86speedfactory.com/images/st44.JPG |
Out of those two, probably the Cusco. Look lighter and have better rose joints (with dust covers).
But all of these arms make me nervous with the shank diameter on those joints. |
Also check out the agency power ones they seem to be the strongest and most well built ones to me.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2 |
Quote:
Thanks for the feedback ft_sjo :) I look forward to more opinions on this. |
I have the Cuscos, but can see pros and cons to both.
Those stance units look beautifully made. Is that billet Aluminium? What do they weigh? The Cuscos are HEAVY! Lovely looking spherical ends too. As posted above, no dust cover. I can see why they'll changed the geometry for the fullee sik dropt too da weedz croo, but it will also decease available droop travel. The Stance adjustment looks like it will sit just inside the sub-frame (like the Cusco). They are a bitch to adjust. Do Stance offer those arms without the big geometry change? If so, I'd be tempted to try them. |
Quote:
coyote, Yes it is billet aluminium but I'm not too sure of the weight... I was hoping someone could also help me out on that one. This is all the info I can find on them... http://www.stance-usa.com/sus/products/links/frs-lca It seems these are the only ones they offer... But adjustable suspension should allow for the drop. Also, what is the problem with no dust covers? (I'm a noob to Control Arms) |
Quote:
|
Rose joints on road cars have never been a really good idea-they're just not designed for that kind of mileage,+ plenty of NVH
Also,think the insurance implications would be pretty negative. Cheers Len |
I asked almost the same question here :
http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=32084 Having had a look (only on their website) at the FIGS lca I decided I will go with them when they become available. (Their email said hopefully this month.) http://shopfigs.com/v1/index.php?rou...product_id=170 Nice thing about the FIGS is you can do the coarse adjustment once with the inbound adjuster then do fine adjusting without geometry changes with the outboard adjusters. The Stance lca lowers the ride height. This may or may not be a good thing depending on application. The Whiteline lca look awesome (billet aluminium) but there is no due date for them. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Plus I have never heard anything about insurance implications for Control Arms. Do you know this from experience? Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
http://ft86speedfactory.com/whitelin...l-arm-626.html |
I like the stance's few guys I know have them and love them. The added suspension travel while still being pretty low is nice. I know build quality from I seen looks great, and I'm not too big of a fan of cusco products.
If you want the absolute best option for rear control arms and have the coin to spend... Contact @Hancha Group. Hands down, best. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Materials...
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:06 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.