| HunterGreene |
04-05-2013 09:50 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by forzajuve
(Post 835108)
He has your driver's license number and insurance, so either way it is logged. For something like "Fail to stop/yield at intersection" I believe (could be totally wrong) is to be considered the same as running a red light. However, you are in Washington so the law may be way different than here in California. If the situation was that you received a speeding ticket, technically that is an unconstitutional law and you can therefore fight that and win.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by forzajuve
(Post 836989)
I sense your sarcasm and lack of knowledge. It is OK, however, as long as you know how to read and do proper research you might be able to save yourself. And maybe once you get out of high school your mind may open up to new and better opportunities!
I have a long time friend, he is an engineer living in California, who has challenged TWO speeding tickets and due to its unconstitutionality his tickets were waived. No need to pay and nothing was on his record. It really comes down to whether or not you principally believe it is worth spending time on defending yourself.
Good luck!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by forzajuve
(Post 837067)
As I said previously, good luck!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by forzajuve
(Post 837186)
ib, you definitely need some luck, ha. If only you personally knew constitutional lawyers...or better yet read a little. Sad. Continue to remain ignorant though. Good luck!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by forzajuve
(Post 838419)
Haha for sure, man. I did and it is the u.s. constitution :D
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by forzajuve
(Post 838712)
I have a way better idea. Do some work for yourself. If you are so interested, go and figure it out on your own :thumbsup: I have done so and I am thoroughly convinced, why? because I did proper research, consulted with the right people and came to my own conclusion of the actual truth. Writing it out will not do justice, that is why I consulted with attorneys face to face. I simply made a side note and planted a seed.
I must have made an impression on you, however, so I appreciate the flattery. If you are feeling particularly motivated to enlighten yourself you should DEFINITELY do so, on your own. Though part of me doubt you will bother...
I am happy I was able to influence you and spark such an interest!
But I am not waiting because I am already ahead... :burnrubber:
peace & love.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by forzajuve
(Post 843278)
never refused, because I did cite. read please. thanks.
|
No. You didn't, aside from pointing a finger at the entire document. But thanks for playing!
And I also don't plan on putting myself in the situation where I will need to consult a lawyer on constitutional law in order to get me out of a speeding ticket which would likely be earned. Is it lazy of me? Maybe. Do I need to do it? No, which is why I am asking you. Given your previous (albeit questionable, given lack of details) experience, you should be easily able to find your specific source that you interpreted to get yourself out of a ticket on Constitutional grounds.
Your callous, superior attitude (dare I say "troll-like?") is the problem here. If I state an opinion or little-known fact, and someone asks me for my sources, I provide them, specifically. In my line of work (engineering/sales) you better DAMN well be ready to back up any claims you make with specific citations. I would never have been able to make it through school if I had just pointed to "this paper" or "that report" as my sources.
What you are claiming sounds like an interpretation of a portion of the Constitution of the USA (assuming that is what you are citing, you weren't even that specific). Please give us the Paragraph, at least the Section that you are referring to. Allow us to do what all great lawmakers have done since the inception of the United States of America, and debate the meaning. This is the last time I will ask.
|