![]() |
Unichip vs ECUtek?
Not sure if this is an appropriate topic, dont want to start any flames, but I'm geniunely curious if anyone has tried both tuning solutions and can compare them objectively? In terms of engine optimization/performance is there any difference?
I know Unichip will obvioulsy have the advantage is price and flexibility (can be unplugged, can be resold, easy to remap) and ECUtek seems to have some features that Unichip does not offer (autoblip, flat foot shifting, etc) but in terms of dyno numbers and engine performance is there any difference? |
If someone has done this, I'd be very interested to hear as well.
|
I would highly doubt that Unichip could do near the performance of the ECUtek tune just because of the things that ECUtek can change. Plus ECUtek has E85 tunes and a soon to be released FlexFuel tune. Totally different animal, as evident by the price of each. I would seriously be impressed if the Unichip could even get close to the ECUtek stuff.
That being said Unichip has free tunes and can be easily removed. One of the free tunes coming out will have E85 support and some of the aspects of ECUtek like launch control. |
To do a proper comparison, it'd be comparable tunes. 91 or 93, not e85
|
Most of the Unichip reviews I've read so far don't have the users raving specifically about power increases. They say that throttle response is significantly improved and the car feels smoother. Maybe some Unichip users haven't tried out the fuel- timing+ maps yet with 93, I dunno. I haven't heard anyone say their car feels significantly more powerful with a Unichip where as there are lots of posts from FA20Club Stage 2 Ecutek tune users that are really impressed by what they claim to be significant (20whp) power increases.
I get the impression that Unichip maps that come preloaded are much more mild and reserved compared to Ecutek maps that include increased redline and more agressive adjustments. I'll be really interested to see how the Unichip E85 maps stack up against Ecutek E85 tunes. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
On that note I've only seen one Unichip car dynoed (on their website taken from someone on forums I believe) so its not much to go off of =/ |
Unless I'm understanding it incorrectly, I will be getting the unichip because it does not remap the ECU. It's just a piggyback so it is virtually untraceable.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Don't have any exp with unichip just ecutek but from what I can see it depends on how hardcore you want your car to be. I haven't seen over heard of unichip being able to riase redline or anything like that |
Quote:
|
Neither offers a free/cheap user end tuning capabilities....as with the Cobb AcessPort Race software....I’m waiting till something of that sort comes out....hopefully.
|
Quote:
to the OP... Ecutek (and BRZedit) has the ability to adjust the majority of the maps that control the engine. Unichip can only alter the signals received by and sent from the ecu, it does not directly alter the maps. Based on the Website, it intercepts crank sensor (so it can alter ignition timing), Maf sensor (so it can alter engine load / fueling), and the Throttle motor so it can alter the dbw output. Take cam timing for example, you can completely remap the cam timing maps with ecutek. With unichip the only changes you can make to cam timing are indirect changes via maf signal (engine load) manipulation, which is not sufficient to actually change the cam timing at WOT by any significant margin. |
So I was thinking about doing the unichip. But to you guys is it worth it? I'll have a drop in filter, catback, over pipe and front pipe. Will the unichip actually alter it much or no? I don't want any chance if voiding warranty, so I wouldn't do any tuning. But if it makes a significant difference I will pay for the unichip.
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:09 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.