Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB

Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/index.php)
-   Engine, Exhaust, Transmission (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   Increased displacement? (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=28313)

Shadowsong6 02-06-2013 10:26 AM

Increased displacement?
 
There is plenty of talk about turbos and superchargers, but what about good old natural aspiration? Has anyone tried to bore or stroke the engine yet? 2.5l shouldn't be too far fetched should it?

HunterGreene 02-06-2013 10:33 AM

Depends on how thick the sidewalls are. One of my friends had his tC1 engine bored from 2.4 to 2.7L. Granted, this was with a turbo, but the cylinder side walls have to be taken into account. I have a feeling with boring, you aren't going to see more than 2.2-2.3L max.

Dimman 02-06-2013 11:01 AM

I think a shop or two here are looking into a frankenstein 2.5L FA25. FA20 heads on an FB25 block. There was also talk of the FB25 crank in an FA20 (don't know which rods, or other stuff needed) which would make a 2.4L FA24 (?).

We'll see if anything happens.

mad_sb 02-06-2013 11:07 AM

Very expensive for the gains. Plus keeping the motor square = deep rev (some are saying 9K on stock valve train but that is crazy piston speed) = power potential with proper cams etc. Combined with Forced Induction... you can run a larger turbo with less lag, but again, if the bore and stroke limits the rev potential you won't get as much benefit from the bigger turbo...

Shadowsong6 02-06-2013 11:32 AM

I'm not really looking to turbo, if I used any kind of f/I it would be a supercharger, I like the feel of a na engine, superchargers still maintain some of the n/a feel. That FA24 frankenblock with a supercharger, some cams, and maybe some meth injection sounds interesting to me.

OrbitalEllipses 02-06-2013 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shadowsong6 (Post 715739)
That FA24 frankenblock with a supercharger, some cams, and maybe some meth injection sounds interesting to me.

With a fully blueprinted and balanced rotating assembly revving to 8.5K-9K, titanium valves/retainers/springs.... :drool:

turbo_jimbo 02-06-2013 01:08 PM

You can't bore these engines because of the sleeve material. However, the new Darton sleeves can be bored.

I wonder if people misunderstand what blueprinting an engine really entails...

OrbitalEllipses 02-06-2013 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by turbo_jimbo (Post 715986)
You can't bore these engines because of the sleeve material. However, the new Darton sleeves can be bored.

I wonder if people misunderstand what blueprinting an engine really entails...

You'd be surprised how many people don't check clearances on an engine build (durrrr drop in pistons yay! durrrrr); so yes, I want a fully blueprinted engine in that regard.

Shadowsong6 02-06-2013 02:35 PM

Since we are on the subject, has anyone started developing cams yet?

carbonBLUE 02-06-2013 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by turbo_jimbo (Post 715986)
You can't bore these engines because of the sleeve material. However, the new Darton sleeves can be bored.

I wonder if people misunderstand what blueprinting an engine really entails...

please explain... (seriously i have no idea what the sleeves are made of)

Quote:

Originally Posted by OrbitalEllipses (Post 716062)
You'd be surprised how many people don't check clearances on an engine build (durrrr drop in pistons yay! durrrrr); so yes, I want a fully blueprinted engine in that regard.

yeah lots of "shops" do that lol

Quote:

Originally Posted by HunterGreene (Post 715642)
Depends on how thick the sidewalls are. One of my friends had his tC1 engine bored from 2.4 to 2.7L. Granted, this was with a turbo, but the cylinder side walls have to be taken into account. I have a feeling with boring, you aren't going to see more than 2.2-2.3L max.

http://i124.photobucket.com/albums/p...ps05295532.jpg


i hope that answers your question... for an open deck block... they are pretty decent...

carbonBLUE 02-06-2013 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shadowsong6 (Post 716211)
Since we are on the subject, has anyone started developing cams yet?

http://www.hks-power.co.jp/en/produc...s86/index.html

in development by hks, but other than that i dunno

industrial 02-06-2013 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shadowsong6 (Post 716211)
Since we are on the subject, has anyone started developing cams yet?

I'm waiting for this too. I've tried contacting Ferrea since they are working on valvetrain components. I'm assuming that if they are testing valvetrain components for NA power and high revs, they'd have a cam in there that could take advantage of it. A ferrea rep casually threw out there that their NA kit was making 250hp at SEMA. :iono:

I'll go this way eventually. High lift, high duration cams with valvetrain upgrades and maybe a mani/tb upgrade. Hopefully good for ~220-250whp at 8500-9500rpm. No idea since nobody is releasing any info.

Captain Insano 02-06-2013 10:41 PM

Cant wait to see some of this stuff evolve.

wparsons 02-07-2013 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OrbitalEllipses (Post 715749)
With a fully blueprinted and balanced rotating assembly revving to 8.5K-9K, titanium valves/retainers/springs.... :drool:

I believe some people are revving to ~8500rpm on 100% stock internals without issues.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.


Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.