![]() |
Quote:
|
Should be fine since it wasn't your fault. You may have to pay your deductible at first and then you should be able to get that back from the guy that caused the accident.
Your rates shouldn't go up either as long as it wasn't your fault and your insurance company doesn't pay out or is reimbursed from the at fault driver. Sorry to hear about the car. Maybe you can get lucky and get a hold of a BRZ. They seem to be less attracted to collisions. :thumbup: |
Damn hope you dont lose to much in deprecation.
|
Quote:
I was rear ended at a stop light in 2008. She told police she was going 50 (45mph speed limit.) I took the initial hit, and I was hit so hard that the roof buckled. There was damage to 3 cars in front of me and would have been more hit if there had been any more before the intersection. There was never anything said about us being too close to each other, it was 100% the fault of the woman that hit me. My insurance (state farm) fronted 100% of the costs for my medical treatment and a rental car and collected reimbursement from the other insurance company (nationwide) at a later time. I received a check for the value of a comparable car (they found a one year newer car of the same model with 15000 more miles and offered the dealer price listed for it, with a slight adjustment for previous damage and the fact that I removed and kept the stereo so the car had none installed.) I also received a lost wage/pain and suffering settlement which was small but not unreasonable for a minimum wage pizza delivery driver. My suggestion to you is to hold out on accepting a settlement for wage/pain until your medical issues are resolved. Take the check for the value of the car so you can replace your vehicle, but if you have any injuries do not take the settlement until after they are 100% resolved. Even if you don't have obvious injuries, wait a few weeks and something may start hurting. I had a tendon injury that took months to heal. Whatever offers you do get, take them to your own insurance agent before accepting and see what they say. |
Quote:
Quote:
As for your coworker, it sounds like the adjuster for his carrier wasn't particularly diligent in dealing with the case. If we see damages that look unrelated and prior, we use those details to help with liability since you can't argue with physical damage. It's unfortunate that your co-worker's carrier took the lazy way out and just paid everything, no questions asked. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I'm going to say that 11k was probably out of our pockets due to higher insurance premiums to cover situations like this? That sucks...
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
You're no better than a bank robber or a murderer in my eyes |
Dont know the rules in California but here a "total loss" is defined by law as "repairs costing greater than 75% of the value of the vehicle". The "value" of the vehicle is the "retail sells price of the car", usually determined by the NADA or KBB retail value.
My child recently hit a deer and got $4375 for a car I paid $5100 for 5 years ago. Usually you come out alright on total loss claims. |
Quote:
|
It's one thing to get just compensation, it's another thing to "use the system to your advantage".
Don't be a ****, what goes around comes around. I'll be sure to drive extra careful around local blue FRS's. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:04 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.