Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB

I posted this in another thread, but I wanted to repost it here to allow other people to add onto it. Everyone who comes on here to complain about the car's price/power/tires should to linked to this thread. :D

Roadtrip is the reason why I wrote this and subsequently created this thread, so I'll start by quoting him.

Quote:

Originally Posted by roadtrip1098 (Post 541896)

When it comes to handling, the engineers decided to fit thinner tires on the car so it would be more edgy and easier to break traction with. In the past if you wanted to make a car edgy you just added power. I completely understand that smaller tires and less power is more economical, but for a sports car? In the company of V6 Mustangs, Hyundai Genisis, ect. I see the BRZ falling short. Yes it handles better than a Mustang, but in the road and track test (might have been car and driver), the Stang somehow held a considerable lead on a road course, followed by the Genisis and it shoddy gearbox.

My problem isn't that the BRZ/FRS is slow, it's that there are plenty of alternative platforms out there that do the same thing for less money - even while doing it on an outdated platform.

To me the BRZ should have been less than $20,000 base price vehicle. If you want to compete with the big boys at the $26k-$28k base price, keep the wider tires on it and give it either the H6 3.0, a supercharger, or turbo.

The TRD/STi versions will come out in 2014 with some of those options, but at a price in the mid $30k range, stepping up competition to things like the 370z, Mustangs, EVO's, Infinity, even BMW 3 series. In that class I'm afraid the BRZ/FRS will not only be outperformed, but also outclassed.

Sometimes it's not about how fast you get to your destination, it's about having fun on your way. Cars with more HP like the evo, sti, v8 stang are MUCH more fun than the FRS in a straight line, but if you've ever driven the frs on the type of road it's meant for you'll experience a different type of fun than just driving in a straight line.

This car was made in the image of the ae86; it's meant for windy mountain roads. You can't feel how low the car's center of gravity is in a straight line. Unfortunately, not everyone has access to the type of roads this car was meant for. In that case, the other cars you mentioned will by far give you a more exciting drive, if your drive consists of straight roads with occasional turns. This car was meant for touge. Luckily, I live about 45 min away from Palomar mountain, which is by far the closest I've ever been to the touges in Japan. This is what the Palomar road looks like:

http://www.socalvelo.com/maps/palomar-route-large.gif

This car is meant for those tight switch backs. I love driving my friends 400hp evo, having your entire body mashed into the seat from the acceleration is thrilling. But I'll never forget the first time I drove palomar south grade in my frs. I stopped at the restaurant at the top and my hands were shaking like the first time I rode a motorcycle. :thumbup:

Read the following about the AE86 and perhaps you will understand. But until you get this car on the type of road it's meant for, the japanese call it a Touge, you will never understand or experience the joy this type of car can create.

AE86 description:

The rear wheel drive configuration, combined with the AE86's light weight (approximately 2300 lb (950–970 kg) curb weight), balance and relatively powerful (and easy to tune) 4A-GEU engine made it popular among the Japanese hashiriya (street racers in Japanese), many of whom raced in mountain passes (touge in Japanese) where the corners suited the AE86 best, especially on the downhill.

Wiki of Touge