Vehicle Hall of Shame
 

Post up a picture of; in your opinion, the ugliest vehicle you have ever seen. (Taken by you or found online)

Keep in mind that this thread is not to BASH people's taste in modifications, but instead something to keep in mind when you receive your next paycheque. :thumbsup:

To respect others privacy and to keep things confidential; I encourage everyone to PLEASE edit out the vehicle's license plate number. :respekt:


Happy searching/posting!

To get things started... Here is one that I always like to bring up.

http://ricerflukes.com/wp-content/up...oard-ricer.jpg

Not the best pic, took it while driving:bonk:The guy had mesh in the driver window too:bellyroll:

http://img2.netcarshow.com/Scion-FR-...llpaper_01.jpg















Just kidding! How about this instead:

http://www.camaro5.com/forums/attach...9&d=1294435098

Lmao WTF is this?! It's like someone melted a pink version of the Stay Puft marshmallow all over their car and called it a day...

I dunno.....but here's a close relative. This one looks like a Porsche. Sort of.

http://images.rcuniverse.com/forum/u...66/Wu60005.jpg

I've taken this picture in a parking lot.

As close as a piece of shit it can be.

http://i.minus.com/jbzmK23tLQ5GvX.jpg

So...did he put a brick then foam? :laughabove:

Duuuude... That's gross... What is that 5h17 in there??

Lol, most of you will get this inside joke...

http://i177.photobucket.com/albums/w...aruBRZ/350.png

Any and all.

Since we're already on a roll of ugly stock cars... Here's one I COMPLETELY hate; whenever I see one, I'd want to punch it in the face!

http://www.buddsmazda.com/assets/pho_specs_mz5.jpg

Don't forget the PT Cruiser...
http://grassrootsmotorsports.com/med...pt_cruiser.jpg

http://images.autobytel.com/2006/Che...exfrpass34.jpg

To compliment the PT cruiser

Looks like GM for the win... I would post Saturn too but I figured I'd already put two GM products down. I could also post most Fords from the 1990's to the early 2000's.

http://gearheads.org/wp-content/uplo...usa_2013_1.jpg

Just so you all don't think I'm domestic hater... Include just about all recent Honda's and Acura's on here... Breaks my heart to say that as well! I am a huge fan of Honda's!

This one is called: "The WalMart Shopper"

And this one is called "the McPorsche Wide-Eleven".

Hope I'm not the only one that hates these things...

Nope! Definitely not!:evil:

I actually like them. It's one of those cars that has a funky look to it, but still manages to look good in a weird kinda way. I'd take one of those before I'd take one of these (which is another car with funky styling, but doesn't really do it for me):

http://zumann.com/data_images/posts/...lvo-c30-04.jpg

Id take the Polestar Volvo over most cars cars with 400HP.

http://images.businessweek.com/ss/06...age/opener.jpg


No joke, I've never been a fan of this design.

Maybe so, but these are pretty nice to drive. The turbo version is a very quick and fast car.

Oh HELL no!!! You did NOT just bash the Volvo C-30!! Those things are nice! (Granted they're nicer in Europe, where they have more interior options like bamboo wood trim, but still....) My friend has that on her short list of cars she's looking at buying, and I keep nudging her in that direction, just so I'll get a chance to drive it.

How has nobody put these twins up yet? (And these pictures do them too much justice; when I see them on the road, I physically shiver at how god-awful looking they are).
http://static.cargurus.com/images/si...8448296367.png
http://file.kelleybluebookimages.com...80x435_pw1.png

Yeah... Chrysler? Umm, the 80's called, and want their Ford Aerostar back. Seriously, my mom's 95 Windstar was a better looking minivan than this (probably rode better too).

Oh gawd; don't forget it's VW twin as well...

http://www.all7seatercars.com/wp-con...gen-Routan.jpg

TOP DOWN TOP DOWN

I actually agree.

I understand that it was designed like that to be aerodynamically superior, but that doesn't make it OK for it to be fugly.

I love that style. To be fair, it looks better in real life and most definitively not in that color. Front end is ugly but that's typical. :sigh:

Attachment 20869

I still think its ugly even at that angle. And I've seen/been inside/mounted tires for quite a few of them and I think it looks goofy. But to each his own I guess.

Summer car

Sent from my DROID4 using Tapatalk 2

Funny thing is, it's not aerodynamically superior...at least I'm pretty sure it isn't. For aerodynamically superior, look at a McLaren. I think it's just the Bugatti tradition of making extremely fugly but exotic looking cars. The roof scoops are not only very draggy, they're also extremely hideous.

Yes they made some of the most ugly cars of all time.

http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt358/dem00n/88.jpg
http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/t...plica-01-1.jpg


:bellyroll:

Yea, I just checked the drag coefficient, not very impressive at 0.41. Even when put into top speed mode, it only drops to 0.36. I always figured because it was so stable at high speeds, it was very aerodynamic.

Well drag coefficient isn't everything, but when competitors are using the same ultra long wheelbase (makes tapering the rear end harder), and getting sufficient downforce and stability with a lot less drag, I think that says something. The Supersport I think has more intelligent ducting, but intake off the roof is not the best idea in the first place. I guess they have a lot more cooling needs because of the massive engine though, and that uses up all the other ducts.