Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB

Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/index.php)
-   Engine, Exhaust, Transmission (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   Thoughts on cam phasing and ECU tuning (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=21447)

brn12345 11-05-2012 07:38 AM

Thoughts on cam phasing and ECU tuning
 
Since the high pressure fuel pump is driven off the exhaust cam and the shape of the lobe (triangle) has an impact on the timing of fuel discharged from the direct injectors, would changing the exhaust cam angle (lets assume we can tune this via the ecu) mess up the direct injection timing?

Grishbok 11-05-2012 07:54 AM

you have a window for which you can inject fuel through the DI. The stock map is pretty conservative, but you can tell the system to inject fuel earlier in that window to sneak more fuel in but you are limited to the confines of that injection window.

serialk11r 11-05-2012 08:18 AM

No, it wouldn't. The injectors are electronically controlled.

brn12345 11-05-2012 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by serialk11r (Post 539053)
No, it wouldn't. The injectors are electronically controlled.

Measuring the fuel that goes into the cavity before the injection nozzle is electronically controlled, but the actual injection is performed by the cam lobe acting on the plunger, so if the cam phase shifts, it should have an impact on the timing of fuel injected. That's how I understand this system to work.

serialk11r 11-05-2012 09:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brn12345 (Post 539060)
Measuring the fuel that goes into the cavity before the injection nozzle is electronically controlled, but the actual injection is performed by the cam lobe acting on the plunger, so if the cam phase shifts, it should have an impact on the timing of fuel injected. That's how I understand this system to work.

Where are you getting this idea? There is only injector pulse duration and fuel pressure regulation. The cam lobe does not act on the plunger, that would be a disaster. The plunger is activated by a solenoid. I'm 100% positive on this. There is no fuel measurement that happens, the "measurement" is done by how long the plunger is open.

Just think about it, if the exhaust valves control the fuel injection, then fuel is injected in the exhaust stroke. That makes no sense.

ElectronSpeed 11-05-2012 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brn12345 (Post 539060)
Measuring the fuel that goes into the cavity before the injection nozzle is electronically controlled, but the actual injection is performed by the cam lobe acting on the plunger, so if the cam phase shifts, it should have an impact on the timing of fuel injected. That's how I understand this system to work.

I see your point. It is not exactly how I think of it. I think of the exhaust cam position has having a bigger impact on pumped volume than timing.

In many current direct injection systems (this one included?), the ecu needs to know the cam position to determine when to close the inlet valve on the pump and get the right volume. Thankfully, the ECU can typically monitor fuel pressure at the fuel rail to understand if they have pumped the right volume toward the fuel rail.

Eric Schieb
Electron Speed

ElectronSpeed 11-05-2012 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brn12345 (Post 539030)
Since the high pressure fuel pump is driven off the exhaust cam and the shape of the lobe (triangle) has an impact on the timing of fuel discharged from the direct injectors, would changing the exhaust cam angle (lets assume we can tune this via the ecu) mess up the direct injection timing?

The "triangle" shaped lobe would be a clue that this is not a fuel injection timing thing. There is little in the engine that happens 1.5 times a crank revolution.

Calum 11-05-2012 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by serialk11r (Post 539082)
Where are you getting this idea? There is only injector pulse duration and fuel pressure regulation. The cam lobe does not act on the plunger, that would be a disaster. The plunger is activated by a solenoid. I'm 100% positive on this. There is no fuel measurement that happens, the "measurement" is done by how long the plunger is open.

Just think about it, if the exhaust valves control the fuel injection, then fuel is injected in the exhaust stroke. That makes no sense.

His explanation seems like he probably knows diesels well. Don't beat him up, it's just a misunderstanding of the difference in the injection systems even if they are both are DI.

gmookher 11-05-2012 01:17 PM

DI on this car is nothing like a diesel

ECU can control rail pressure

SkullWorks 11-05-2012 01:21 PM

yeah, sounds like you guys got this sorted out,

There is a mechanical pump which is acted upon by the Cam shaft via a 3 lobe profile, the solenoid on the mechanical pump controls how much of the fuel is trapped (it is called a spill valve for a reason) in the mechanical pump and therefore affects the rail pressure,

The direct injectors are then triggered electronically, via a peak and hold driver box of sorts that is under hood on the passenger side.

benster 11-05-2012 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by serialk11r (Post 539082)
Where are you getting this idea? There is only injector pulse duration and fuel pressure regulation. The cam lobe does not act on the plunger, that would be a disaster. The plunger is activated by a solenoid. I'm 100% positive on this. There is no fuel measurement that happens, the "measurement" is done by how long the plunger is open.

Just think about it, if the exhaust valves control the fuel injection, then fuel is injected in the exhaust stroke. That makes no sense.

I know it doesn't work like that anymore even in most diesels, but I would like to know why on earth would it be a disaster if the injector would be activated by a cam lobe? that lobe would just be different than the valve lobes and not at the same angle either. it worked for decades, it is old tech, but did work.

Aza 11-05-2012 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by benster (Post 539478)
I know it doesn't work like that anymore even in most diesels, but I would like to know why on earth would it be a disaster if the injector would be activated by a cam lobe? that lobe would just be different than the valve lobes and not at the same angle either. it worked for decades, it is old tech, but did work.


This tech pre-dates variable cam phasing - if you were to create a setup like this your injector timing would be in a fixed relationship with the valve timing, which would remove one aspect of modern engines' adjustability.

Also the tech (when applied to diesel engines) didn't have to cope with the ~8000rpm redline that many engines see today.

benster 11-05-2012 08:46 PM

i know that, I'm not saying it should be still used, just that it was working back then. and btw there are p-pumped cummins engines turning 6500rpm with injectors like that, and that make over 2000hp.

again, this should not be used on cars like the brz or any new engines for that matter, just stating facts. it would still work with cam phasing as the injector lobe would be affected the same as the valves.

Coheed 11-05-2012 09:28 PM

So much debate on how the fuel injection pump works. It's just a high pressure pump. The timing is still controlled by the injector driver and ECU. They are independent, and cam phasing has nothing to do with the injection timing.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:02 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.


Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.