![]() |
Quote:
http://i.imgur.com/UoFrF.gif (pictured: 2JZFSE) |
Quote:
|
I think you can't mess with the piston shape with D4-S, they don't use stratified charge but the piston is shaped so the direct injector + port injector create a very even distribution of fuel in the cylinder. If you remove the piston shape, don't expect the performance to stay the same; uneven AFR will promote detonation and poor combustion.
|
Quote:
the dish in the piston has little to do with D-4S, because other cars without D-4S have the dish as well. |
Quote:
|
1) Buy a WRX EJ20 turbo motor, wiring harness and ECU for $2000 used
2) Sell your FT86 motor for $2000 3) Profit! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
EDIT: So for people who only want a tiny bump in power, continuing the discussion from the main thread in main forum, 200hp at 7000 is actually pretty pathetic considering what went into this motor. A better exhaust might be able to give a little more and if you don't mind the slight decrease in fuel economy, bigger cams would do some too. 215hp might be realistic considering how the torque is a relatively impressive compared to torque peak 148ft-lb at 7000. And I am still betting a few years down the road there will be an engine update. I'm not getting a car anytime soon, still in college, but if I'm right I probably will go for said updated FT, well if nothing better comes out. |
You forgot labor for installing your new(used) EJ20 turbo motor.
|
215.... I hope your talking WHP at that number, and even then your forgetting all the other stuff you can do to an NA motor.
EDIT: I was thinking more in the range of 260-280 still staying NA. |
Quote:
|
Granted it depends on the block and internals, but it is entirely possible. Throw a really aggressive heads/cam set up on it, plus your headers,intake manifold, throttle body, and other basic bolt on's. I fail to see why you think that its not possible to milk another 60-80 hp out of it.
I'm pretty confident that its a very conservatively tuned motor like most factory production cars. I've also seen far more aggressive power gains from NA motors, for instance a 99 Formula with a heads/cam/intake/headers pushing 440 whp (305 is stock at crank). Why do you find it unreasonable to put 280 out of a FR-S / BRZ |
Not going to happen without changing displacement. And no, I was talking brake hp. There is no way some simple stuff like that will net 40hp in gains. I don't think I'm forgetting, I am just listing the things that would be relatively cheap.
|
My old DC5 CR was 11.0:1, i stayed NA but planned on boosting, however car got totaled. But point in case that motor was high strong, many people i know boosted and did fine on stock parts. A friend of mine was pushing 320whp of 9 psi i think with a bolt on greddy kit. Point is though 12.5:1 is pretty high, higher than most wanted it to be, there will be a few kits out there not to mention the few that will custom buld their set up. I prolly boost mine anyway its all about how its tuned, personally im not power hungry so if i can boost and get 250whp running 7psi on stock safely ill be happy.
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:17 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.