![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Subaru JDM ECUs are programmed to burn JDM gasoline, its certainly not the same.
|
Quote:
91 doesn't count. :) |
With respect to tuning, I remember that both the mk1 concept (with interior) and some of the mule spy pics showed USB ports in the centre console (abeit the mule pics aren't exactly clear or reliable) so what I'm getting at is that while one of the ports might be for the HU, the other might act like a connection to a laptop to tune? It's possible, why not ;)
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
We all know 91 is usually the highest common octane, and it doesnt work. And yes by programmed I meant tuned. |
Quote:
And 93 octane (R+M/2) should be 98 RON, I am looking at a chart for 91 octane (R+M/2) and it is 96 RON. |
Here in NZ we use 91, 95, and 98 octanes.
Would using AV Gas cause any problems for D4-S? That has been made availble for racing use again due to problems with supplys of other ethanol? based racing gas. |
AV gas is leaded, that would screw up your engine wouldn't it?
|
Leded gas would definitely mess up any new engine. As well as contaminate the sensors in the exhaust stream and the catalytic converter(s).
Direct injection is tried and true technology. It has been used for decades on the worlds most reliable diesel engines. Those engines are some of the the easiest to make power on as well as being extremely efficient. Think about that if you are worried about the reliability or performance of the direct injection system Toyota will be employing on the FT-86 platform. I'm sure it will be a great system. And even if it has some draw backs for tuning, it will make up for them with efficiency and reliability. This is the future, embrace it. -TheBetterMethod |
Did you seriously just compare a compression ignition engine to a spark ignition engine based on the fact that it is same fuel delivery method? On that note did you just compare diesel fuel to petrol fuel?
What the hell are you smoking, cus I want some? Quote:
|
NO.
I am referring only to the similarities in the direct injection. I am more than aware of the differences in diesel and petrol. I wasn't comparing ignition methods in any way. To clarify, DI is a tried and true technology. Adapting it to gasoline (petrol) injection is not new technology, and certainly not new to Toyota. It is reliable, and I think the aftermarket will catch up with it in due time...they always do. And just for the record, I'm not smoking anything. ;) |
Quote:
So, you don't see a problem with the carbon build-up issue on the FT-86 design. Good to know. Thanks. :thumbsup: |
The ECU will be easily flash-able. For you current and prior Subaru owners, you can probably use OpenECU/ECUFlash on launch, that is if they don't encrypt it but almost every DI car has a locked ECU soo..
D4-S and direct injection is a good and bad thing. Good is you can easily run E85, higher compression, and it's very responsive, better MPG with more power/tq. Bad thing is price for parts replacement and the biggie; carbon build up. Carbon build up is horrible on DI cars and using additives like Seafoam or ZMax do not work like it does on port injected vehicles. The first thing to do is get a pcv/air-oil separator system(proper "catchcan", usually around $120+ for a functioning one. This will help with at least 95% of Carbon build up. Example http://www.mikenorrismotorsports.com...atch_Cans.html |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:25 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.