![]() |
V6 vs. Flat 4 Boxer
I know many of you have experience the power of a V6.
Today on my way to classes on the highway (Meadowbrook Parkway) i was in the extreme left lane doing about 65mph in my 2000 Nissan Maxima and realized that i was coming up on my exit fast with a few cars in the other 2 lanes parallel to me. Panicked.... i punched the accelerator, the V6 respond with tremendous power, enabling me to cut over both lanes and make my exit. Then i question my self- will my new car be this fun? its not a V6? what will it be capable of? only way to find is to ask! :iono: Do you miss the Power of a V6? Is the Boxer Engine Comparable with a V6? How Responsive is the engine when trying to pass or cut in and out of traffic? Whats your take on the Boxer Engine? (Positive or Negative) |
You're kidding me right...?
|
Quote:
Not sure what your asking here, the 86 was designed for driving enjoyment and world class handling, not horse power and torque. Not all v6 are created equal and produce widely different power figures. What I believe you are referencing is the feel of torque, and if you want that, you should trade youre maxima for a turbo 4cyl, just about any of them will be capable of producing more torque than the maxima. The 86 is a precision car, it does not compensate for driver error, on the road or on the track. This is the kind of car thats created to be the surgeons scalpal of the mass-consumer car world, not a drag car. |
The engine in the FR-S makes almost exactly the same amount of power as your Maxima.
It's also 400lbs lighter. You will be able to go quite a bit faster in it. |
Quote:
Quote:
Btw i plan on keeping my engine stock- No steroids for my car! |
Quote:
If you want a V6 car that is somewhat similar to the FR-S, get a Hyundai Genesis 3.8. |
Quote:
But goodlooks on the suggestion. dont know if its an insult or not! |
Quote:
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus |
Personally, I hate V6 engines, they are a dying design, they dont produce enough power to compensate for the additional weight, a turbo-4cyl is much more powerful, lighter weight, better balanced, and for non-race oriented perspectives, better mileage.
If your talking, even thinking about a v6 in the frs, stop that thought and end it right there because your missing the entire purpose and design focus of the car. |
Dud3, ur ganna h4t3 da B0x3r it d0 not haf a v6 in it lik da max has s0 it sux vry sl0 u kn0? i wuld pik 25 v6s in ma frs iffa had da option den it be m4d f4st n i wuldnt h4f 2 lern 2 driv3 n culd sw3rv r43l f4st 4 ma ex1t l1k a R-tard
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://i0.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/.../216/7nTnr.png |
Quote:
Sent from my Nexus 7 |
I am a bit biased. I swapped my MR2 with a V6. It is lighter, faster, and would out maneuver my FRS.
I got my FRS for better fuel economy without sacrificing fun and good looks. It's widely accepted that the FRS is not a fast car. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:50 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.