![]() |
Explorer EcoBoost gets low marks
Car and Driver First Drive of the 2012 Explorer EcoBoost
Quote:
Quote:
I found it somewhat interesting. Motor Trend has a vendetta against MyTouch (and the Explorer it seems), but even Car and Drive was negative against the 4 pot EcoBoost power-train in the 4500lb. Explorer. As a result we have the: 3.5L V6: 290hp@6500rpm and 255lb-ft@4000rpm at EPA 17C/25H mpg vs. 2.0L Turbo I4: 240hp@5500rpm and 270lb-ft@3000rpm at EPA 20C/28H mpg With the V6 getting a higher praise in the Explorer despite it's lower torque and milage figures. Thoughts on the subject? |
Eh, 9.2 seconds 0-60 isn't bad for that sort of engine power to weight. I guess the rest of the car is pretty horrible though, not much of a surprise?
|
I think we should be past the point of needing something that large to shuttle anklebiters around and bring home groceries.
But what the hell do I know? I drive a Miata. |
All the manufacturers have to move to smaller displacement in order to meet CAFE down the road. Ford has been bragging about the EcoBoost and it may become an export item.
|
Quote:
This is one of the few new models in recent history that has severely missed the mark. Quote:
Quote:
F150 EcoBoost, it you want to take a read. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:49 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.