Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB

Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/index.php)
-   Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   Production of MR2 stopped in 2007; new car will be a coupé instead of roadster (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=147986)

weederr33 03-08-2017 07:35 PM

I like this a lot. Personally I think the MR2 should take the 86's position and then up the 86's refinement and possibly power. Then let the Supra be the god-teir car.

airjonny 03-08-2017 07:46 PM

MR2 would have to go between the 86 and Supra. The 86 makes more sense being the lower end sports car and the SFR the odd car out. I just can't see the SFR being that cheap without being bad or hurting 86 sales. The MR2 as the middle child allows for better spacing in the lineup.

strat61caster 03-08-2017 08:06 PM

Jesus even gymratter recognizes this is clickbait.

Quote:

Originally Posted by WolfpackS2k (Post 2868220)
:bs:

I'll eat my hat if the Supra comes out lighter than a 911.

Depends on if BMW spends money on weight reduction or something else, the last Z4 clocks in under 3,300 lbs in base trim, if Mazda can drop weight off their previous roadster I'm sure the Germans could too, and they're getting a Toyota cash infusion. The 911 is nearly 3,200 lbs according to Porsche's website, only about 100 lbs to cut out of a luxury convertible to make the mark.

It's more possible than anything else discussed in this thread.

gymratter 03-08-2017 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tcoat (Post 2868142)
It is clickbait. You pictured the vehicle (SFR) that was referenced as the third member of the potential "trio" in an actual interview with Toyota execs (Including Tada). Not sure where they pulled this MR thing out of. Some unqualified "quotes" and a render do not constitute fact.

not to mention that rendering is old as dirt. its been floating around since 2012 as a place holder for the "new Supra".

http://www.motortrend.ca/en/news/toy...-the-pipeline/

http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?p=1240045

Tcoat 03-08-2017 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gymratter (Post 2868312)
not to mention that rendering is old as dirt. its been floating around since 2012 as a place holder for the "new Supra".

http://www.motortrend.ca/en/news/toy...-the-pipeline/

http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?p=1240045

Yep and the GRMN concept car was from 2011 was said to be the MR2 that would be available in "early 2017". Slow month so the clickbaits are digging up ancient history and claiming it is new. People will still believe it though.

serialk11r 03-08-2017 08:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strat61caster (Post 2868309)
Depends on if BMW spends money on weight reduction or something else, the last Z4 clocks in under 3,300 lbs in base trim, if Mazda can drop weight off their previous roadster I'm sure the Germans could too, and they're getting a Toyota cash infusion. The 911 is nearly 3,200 lbs according to Porsche's website, only about 100 lbs to cut out of a luxury convertible to make the mark.

It's more possible than anything else discussed in this thread.

Agreed. Cayman is claimed to be 2900lbs, but I think Porsche is cheating when they say that because no owner reports a number much under 3000lbs on the scales. Maybe it's 2900lbs if you're low on washer fluid, have PCCBs, the overpriced lithium ion battery, your tires are bald, and you're slightly low on engine oil? lol...

<3000lbs for the Supra is not impossible. If we start with the BRZ as an example, throwing out the rear seats shaves some weight off, lightweight materials in the body can counter the weight gain in the brakes and such, and a V6 engine would barely add any weight over the ridiculously heavy Subaru flat 4. An extra 150lbs in engine/trans gets you to 2900lbs, then some more weight here and there to reinforce stuff gets you to 3000lbs, then subtract some weight from exotic material usage and decreased passenger compartment size.

krayzie 03-08-2017 08:46 PM

Leave the latest Toyota sports car rumors to Best Car magazine.

http://bestcarweb.jp/wp-content/uplo...6-768x1084.jpg

I think it's saying 50th anniversary of Toyota 2000GT and Mazda Cosmo this year could these models make a come back?

http://bestcarweb.jp/wp-content/uplo...17/02/1a-2.jpg

funwheeldrive 03-08-2017 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by krayzie (Post 2868341)
Leave the latest Toyota sports car rumors to Best Car magazine.

http://bestcarweb.jp/wp-content/uplo...6-768x1084.jpg

I think it's saying 50th anniversary of Toyota 2000GT and Mazda Cosmo this year could these models make a come back?

That's a nice looking Toyota Camaro

gymratter 03-08-2017 08:53 PM

^^^
its probably just the new Supra.

http://blog.caranddriver.com/toyota-...orts-concepts/

strat61caster 03-08-2017 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by serialk11r (Post 2868329)
and a V6 engine would barely add any weight over the ridiculously heavy Subaru flat 4.

lol, like it isn't going to have the B48/B58 in it

krayzie 03-08-2017 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by funwheeldrive (Post 2868344)
That's a nice looking Toyota Camaro

LMAO!

serialk11r 03-08-2017 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strat61caster (Post 2868347)
lol, like it isn't going to have the B48/B58 in it

That's why I added 100lbs for the turbos and stuff. The shortblock should not be much heavier in I6 or V6 configuration.

why? 03-08-2017 10:28 PM

i wish. They should just take the Yaris platform and flip it like they did the original MR2. A simple lightweight rear engine rear wheel drive. Don't need to change anything.

Silver Cervy 03-08-2017 10:40 PM

Anyone know what happened to this thing?

https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/i...P8D8yhmPIwVSFU

serialk11r 03-08-2017 11:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Silver Cervy (Post 2868402)
Anyone know what happened to this thing?

https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/i...P8D8yhmPIwVSFU

Kei car, sold in Japan only.

reni 03-08-2017 11:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gymratter (Post 2868089)
sounds like click bait...

im pretty sure the 3rd sports car will be the SF-R.

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-0SONu7fsYl...A_S-FR_011.jpg

I head sad trombone inside my head every time I see this car

vh_supra26 03-09-2017 12:23 AM

If there is any truth behind this I'm think it will be expensive and maybe sold under the Lexus brand.

Mr.ac 03-09-2017 05:24 AM

It's all bullshit till I see it on a dealer show room.

krayzie 03-09-2017 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by reni (Post 2868428)
I head sad trombone inside my head every time I see this car

It's another Toyota fish face this one's a puffer.

Tcoat 03-09-2017 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by krayzie (Post 2868531)
It's another Toyota fish face this one's a puffer.

May of been what started the whole look since the render is from 2011!

gymratter 03-09-2017 10:37 AM

did some digging, looks like more rehash rumors of a "mid engine BMW & Toyota/Lexus sports car".

http://www.carmagazine.co.uk/spy-sho...-new-supra-z7/

also rereading the evo article, Tada san was never quoted saying anything about a new MR2. only that Toyota wants a 3 sports car line up.

Quote:

Speaking to Evo at the Geneva Motor Show, Tetsuya Tada - Gazoo Racing’s boss - said that Toyota’s sports car line-up will consist of “The Three Brothers”. By that, he means the GT86, the Supra, and - the motoring world is assuming - a new MR2.
https://www.carthrottle.com/post/it-...-as-the-supra/

DrifterD 03-09-2017 10:54 AM

I dig it.

teamturbo 03-09-2017 11:18 AM

Eh, $10 says the Supra will basically be a rebadged BMW or Mercedes. Expensive, no longer a "Toyota". Somewhere along the lines of a Corvette + in price. It will be too heavy and hyper loaded with gadgetry.

MR2...I don't see happening, but would be interesting. Either way, it will probably suck and be heavy. Every day, these companies are distancing themselves further and further from the classics they once produced. NSX is a perfect example of taking a very high performance car that was attainable, and turning it into an elite space shuttle like vehicle that costs as much as a Lamborghini.

FR-S is an outlier in recent history and will go down as a classic sports car 30yrs from now, like the S2000.

Day by day, I'm becoming more interested in cars with less gadgetry and more about performance and purity. That's what made me fall in love with the FR-S. Contemplating picking up a low mile supercharged Elise / Exige for 35-55K as a weekend sports car and call it good. Not the fastest, but who cares. Hella fun and it's something none of the car companies are doing.

SCQTT 03-09-2017 11:19 AM

What do the twins weigh now? 2,800ish on a good day? For a 300HP version you are going to be at 3,300 and 35K.

Sure it is fairly easy to get 300 with bolt-ons, lots of people do it, but Toyota Corporate can't do that. There are a million reasons why they can't. It was engineered for 200HP maybe 250, that is why it is fairly light. Add a bunch more power and things start to get wonky. That's OK for the enthusiast, overcoming challenges is part of the fun, but Toyota Corporate is huge and challenges for them become massive. Anyone want to guess how much R&D and engineering went into making sure our floor mats stay correctly positioned? Multiply that times the variations all over the world of all the Toyotas that are manufactured and sold.

They prefer challenges such as how do we manufacture each Corolla for $100 less per unit while maintaining customer satisfaction. Seriously.

Consider if it were a $35K car what the buyers would expect for their money....some would be happy with performance, but most would want some luxury. Luxury adds weight and is a horsepower drain and necessitates bigger stronger and heavier everything else. It's a slippery slope. A 3,000lbs 300 HP car...with all the right driving dynamics (and meeting corporate needs) is a real challenge.

zigzagz94 03-09-2017 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by krayzie (Post 2868341)
Leave the latest Toyota sports car rumors to Best Car magazine.

http://bestcarweb.jp/wp-content/uplo...6-768x1084.jpg

I think it's saying 50th anniversary of Toyota 2000GT and Mazda Cosmo this year could these models make a come back?

http://bestcarweb.jp/wp-content/uplo...17/02/1a-2.jpg


I'm more interested in that Mazda in the back. Can we get scans of that (maybe in one of the RX-7 return threads)? Thanks.

krayzie 03-09-2017 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zigzagz94 (Post 2868604)
I'm more interested in that Mazda in the back. Can we get scans of that (maybe in one of the RX-7 return threads)? Thanks.

Done. The bestcarweb.jp website just changed the cover so I took the link from my original post.

You know it does say Mazda Cosmo in Japanese not RX-7. :thumbsup:

Next issue is rumor of Nissan Silvia return (wonder why they don't connect it to the Renault Alpine but not like I can actually read Japanese).

http://bestcarweb.jp/wp-content/uplo...ar20170410.jpg

http://bestcarweb.jp/wp-content/uplo...17/03/1a-2.jpg

SCQTT 03-09-2017 12:05 PM

The RX9 is a Miata RF....that is it, end of story. The only thing you can hope for is a Mazdaspeed version. No more rotary, it is simply too dirty. the EPA has gutted things like this. With CAFE and VW/Dieselgate I do not see people stretching on dirty stuff.

I'd like to have two stroke street motorcycles again They would sell in such small numbers it would not make any difference, but the green Nazis have killed those too.

zigzagz94 03-09-2017 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by funwheeldrive (Post 2868344)
That's a nice looking Toyota Camaro


LOL, but the first gen 70's era Celica was called the "Japanese Mustang" so who knows maybe Toyota is feeling nostalgic

funwheeldrive 03-09-2017 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zigzagz94 (Post 2868628)
LOL, but the first gen 70's era Celica was called the "Japanese Mustang" so who knows maybe Toyota is feeling nostalgic

A Japanese pony car would be cool. Too bad Nissan is dead now.

WolfpackS2k 03-09-2017 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCQTT (Post 2868590)
What do the twins weigh now? 2,800ish on a good day? For a 300HP version you are going to be at 3,300 and 35K.

Sure it is fairly easy to get 300 with bolt-ons, lots of people do it, but Toyota Corporate can't do that. There are a million reasons why they can't. It was engineered for 200HP maybe 250, that is why it is fairly light. Add a bunch more power and things start to get wonky. That's OK for the enthusiast, overcoming challenges is part of the fun, but Toyota Corporate is huge and challenges for them become massive. Anyone want to guess how much R&D and engineering went into making sure our floor mats stay correctly positioned? Multiply that times the variations all over the world of all the Toyotas that are manufactured and sold.

They prefer challenges such as how do we manufacture each Corolla for $100 less per unit while maintaining customer satisfaction. Seriously.

Consider if it were a $35K car what the buyers would expect for their money....some would be happy with performance, but most would want some luxury. Luxury adds weight and is a horsepower drain and necessitates bigger stronger and heavier everything else. It's a slippery slope. A 3,000lbs 300 HP car...with all the right driving dynamics (and meeting corporate needs) is a real challenge.

You really don't know what you're talking about if you don't think Toyota is capable of developing a more powerful FRS, at a reasonable cost, at less than 3000 lb. Must have a very low opinion of their engineering ability.

SCQTT 03-09-2017 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WolfpackS2k (Post 2868675)
You really don't know what you're talking about if you don't think Toyota is capable of developing a more powerful FRS, at a reasonable cost, at less than 3000 lb. Must have a very low opinion of their engineering ability.

No, not at all. I'm actually in awe of their ability.

Their financial people also have a high level of competence.

As it was stated before, enjoy the car, it will NOT continue. From a financial standpoint it is NOT a success. Sure there are a few on here that are passionate about the car, but that is few and far between. Even the dealers are not interested.

We are more like likely to see a 200HP Corolla or a 350HP Camry, before we see a 275HP 86

The twins were an exercise, we benefitted, Toyota lost.

strat61caster 03-09-2017 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by serialk11r (Post 2868378)
That's why I added 100lbs for the turbos and stuff. The shortblock should not be much heavier in I6 or V6 configuration.

Why do you keep talking about a V6? BMW isn't going to put a V6 in it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BMW_B48
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BMW_B58

Quote:

Originally Posted by teamturbo (Post 2868589)
Eh, $10 says the Supra will basically be a rebadged BMW or Mercedes.

Jesus, Toyota will be rebadging a BMW Z5, that's been clear as day for years, there's nothing to speculate about on that front.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCQTT (Post 2868590)
What do the twins weigh now? 2,800ish on a good day?

Mine weighs under 2,750 without my fat ass in it.

:burnrubber:

Quote:

Originally Posted by WolfpackS2k (Post 2868675)
You really don't know what you're talking about if you don't think Toyota is capable of developing a more powerful FRS, at a reasonable cost, at less than 3000 lb. Must have a very low opinion of their engineering ability.

That's the trick, 'reasonable cost'

For logical people, that reasonable cost would be ~$35k give or take trim options.
For armchair internet quarterbacks it's $29k because 'all you have to do is put a turbo on it!'

daiheadjai 03-09-2017 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WolfpackS2k (Post 2868675)
You really don't know what you're talking about if you don't think Toyota is capable of developing a more powerful FRS, at a reasonable cost, at less than 3000 lb. Must have a very low opinion of their engineering ability.

The issue isn't doing it. The issue is doing it profitably.

Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk

krayzie 03-09-2017 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by daiheadjai (Post 2868693)
The issue isn't doing it. The issue is doing it profitably.

Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk

Sometimes I think the "Z" in the name BRZ meant that's the best they can offer within the most economical means possible.

No question Toyota is a master of lean, I mean their past executives did manage to help turn around the fortunes for Porsche.

No high power 86/BRZ because that would go against one of the original ideals of the Miata in which this project was really based on.

serialk11r 03-09-2017 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strat61caster (Post 2868692)
Why do you keep talking about a V6? BMW isn't going to put a V6 in it.

What part about "V6 or I6" wasn't clear? V6 or I6, the weight is pretty similar. Usually the engine is in the high 300lbs range for a 3.5L engine, mid to low 300s for a 3.0L.

H4 vs I4 is a big difference unfortunately. Usually a performance 2L I4 is 300lbs ish maybe less, but the H4 engines are more in the mid 300lb range.

Strap on turbos and intercoolers, the 6 cylinder will probably gain close to 100lbs.

Coaster 03-09-2017 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by krayzie (Post 2868917)
Sometimes I think the "Z" in the name BRZ meant that's the best they can offer within the most economical means possible.

No question Toyota is a master of lean, I mean their past executives did manage to help turn around the fortunes for Porsche.

No high power 86/BRZ because that would go against one of the original ideals of the Miata in which this project was really based on.

I sure hope the low consumer demand for the 86 and even good journos saying the car needs more go make the designers make changes to the gen2.


If they don't make changes then no more 86.:(

I hope they use an updated wrx engine in the gen2.

strat61caster 03-09-2017 06:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by serialk11r (Post 2868947)
What part about "V6 or I6" wasn't clear? V6 or I6, the weight is pretty similar. Usually the engine is in the high 300lbs range for a 3.5L engine, mid to low 300s for a 3.0L.

BMW doesn't make a V6, why would a V6 be in this chassis at all?

Might as well bring up how much an LS weighs for how relevant it is to the discussion at hand.

I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm saying this car will never have a V6 in it from the factory.

funwheeldrive 03-09-2017 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coaster (Post 2868957)
I hope they use an updated wrx engine in the gen2.

I wouldn't hold your breath on that.

serialk11r 03-09-2017 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strat61caster (Post 2868969)
BMW doesn't make a V6, why would a V6 be in this chassis at all?

Might as well bring up how much an LS weighs for how relevant it is to the discussion at hand.

I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm saying this car will never have a V6 in it from the factory.

The whole conversation was about weight...-_-

strat61caster 03-09-2017 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by serialk11r (Post 2868991)
The whole conversation was about weight...-_-

Why discuss the weight of some unrealistic hypothetical?

-_-


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:51 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.


Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.