Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB

Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/index.php)
-   BRZ Second-Gen (2022+) -- General Topics (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=98)
-   -   Dyno and LOTS of Data Analysis! (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=147807)

SpectreRT 12-01-2021 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Interceptor777 (Post 3485813)
Hmm, what's the purpose of the 1000 miles break in which is in the manual then? I'm just curious.

Likely, to prevent people from breaking things while they're still getting their supply chain together to support the platform. (I.E. having stock of parts to do repairs)

Yoshoobaroo 12-01-2021 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beat1 (Post 3485819)
There's a middle ground to respect


Like letting it warm up first [emoji6]

alphasaur 12-01-2021 06:14 PM

For shits and giggles what does a stock speed 3 put down on this dyno? Wondering how this compares to my old cars.

ayau 12-01-2021 06:23 PM

The potentially higher flow intake manifold looks promising.

Any idea if the AF runs in full time closed loop?

What octane was the car on? Think there was potentially some knock/timing retard?

How does the OEM header look? Any large kinks and/or potential for better flow headers?

Do we know if Ecutek is currently working on unlocking the ecu?

Blighty 12-01-2021 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ayau (Post 3485851)
...How does the OEM header look? Any large kinks and/or potential for better flow headers?

Yes, removing the cat =D

Kona61 12-01-2021 11:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ayau (Post 3485851)
The potentially higher flow intake manifold looks promising.

Any idea if the AF runs in full time closed loop?

What octane was the car on? Think there was potentially some knock/timing retard?

How does the OEM header look? Any large kinks and/or potential for better flow headers?

Do we know if Ecutek is currently working on unlocking the ecu?

He said in the video the 22 is running less timing than he expected and a decent bit less than the 1st gen.

Also, I EcuTek isn’t working yet for the new car.

ayau 12-02-2021 01:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kona61 (Post 3485929)
He said in the video the 22 is running less timing than he expected and a decent bit less than the 1st gen.

Also, I EcuTek isn’t working yet for the new car.

It's possible there's a little bit of knock. Hard to know without seeing the knock sensor data.

Would like to know if this was on 91 or 93.

Strat_FRS 12-02-2021 02:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alphasaur (Post 3485850)
For shits and giggles what does a stock speed 3 put down on this dyno? Wondering how this compares to my old cars.


It's hard to find a stock speed3 these days but a stock STI will be in the 225-235whp range

Strat_FRS 12-02-2021 02:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ayau (Post 3485851)
The potentially higher flow intake manifold looks promising.

Any idea if the AF runs in full time closed loop?

What octane was the car on? Think there was potentially some knock/timing retard?

How does the OEM header look? Any large kinks and/or potential for better flow headers?

Do we know if Ecutek is currently working on unlocking the ecu?


I am going to do more testing on the manifolds on the car. More to come there.



The car is on our 93 ... however we have some of the worst fuel in North America. That being said I don't think the car was knocking and being NA is less prone to it. the Gen1 tuned can run more timing than the Gen2 on the stock tune on the same fuel so it's promising.



EcuTek is working on it as we speak.


The long term fuel trims were active all the way to redline but the short term were not.

alphasaur 12-02-2021 10:12 AM

Man, turboing a gen 1 is a very hard argument to make in light of how much power gen 2 makes, then if it also picks up 15-25whp with a tune and better fuel???

OOF.

OkieSnuffBox 12-02-2021 12:41 PM

What header was on the car?

And what tune? OTS? Custom? etc.

Apologies if it mentions that, I don't have time to watch that right now. I'm in a small break from like 7 hours of meetings today.

PulsarBeeerz 12-02-2021 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alphasaur (Post 3485991)
Man, turboing a gen 1 is a very hard argument to make in light of how much power gen 2 makes, then if it also picks up 15-25whp with a tune and better fuel???

OOF.


Mmh well no. The turbo Gen1 dyno in that video is having concerning issues if it is indeed running 12lbs of boost and making under 240whp and under 200ft/tq. LOL We have plenty of data for FI FA20s at this point with that result being an outlier.

I don't buy that this dyno reads 14% lower than a Dynojet either. Mustang dynos read whatever the operator wants..That tuned Gen1 would be making over 200whp on pump gas if that was the case and the Gen2 245whp which doesn't happen on Dynojets... It reads like a Mustang dyno calibrated to deliver result similar to a Dynojet with SAE correction factor.

Another strong showing for the Gen2 regardless. Its the NA engine the car needed along.

ayau 12-02-2021 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strat_FRS (Post 3485953)
I am going to do more testing on the manifolds on the car. More to come there.



The car is on our 93 ... however we have some of the worst fuel in North America. That being said I don't think the car was knocking and being NA is less prone to it. the Gen1 tuned can run more timing than the Gen2 on the stock tune on the same fuel so it's promising.



EcuTek is working on it as we speak.


The long term fuel trims were active all the way to redline but the short term were not.

Short term being inactive means it’s in open loop during WOT, correct?

If that’s the case, it doesn’t look like you can add a bit of e85 to boost the octane without affecting AFR too much.

alphasaur 12-02-2021 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PulsarBeeerz (Post 3486024)
Mmh well no. The turbo Gen1 dyno in that video is having concerning issues if it is indeed running 12lbs of boost and making under 240whp and under 200ft/tq. LOL We have plenty of data for FI FA20s at this point with that result being an outlier.

I don't buy that this dyno reads 14% lower than a Dynojet either. Mustang dynos read whatever the operator wants..That tuned Gen1 would be making over 200whp on pump gas if that was the case and the Gen2 245whp which doesn't happen on Dynojets... It reads like a Mustang dyno calibrated to deliver result similar to a Dynojet with SAE correction factor.

Another strong showing for the Gen2 regardless. Its the NA engine the car needed along.

While the turbo does look weak, a reasonably tuned SC/Turbo gen 1 is ~260-280whp. If the gen2 can hit 230-240whp with minor mods for me it makes a FI gen 1 a hard argument to make when you also look at the worse reliability profile.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.


Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.