![]() |
Interesting to see the work being done on a hybrid. With how difficult FA20 cores are to get this is very viable.
Trigger wheel for the crankshaft is not a big deal, machining one to fit is no big deal using a BRZ core. The 2017/2013-2016 is around the cam tooth pattern. On the older cars they are one way and the 17+ and DIT models it is the opposite (male/female) so the ECU will have an inverse shape and thus not work. But if you're using cam phasers from whichever generation you're working with it should be a non-issue. The bigger issue to me looks to be the piston design. Those valve cutouts don't look nearly big enough for the FA20 but hard to say 100% from the pictures alone. As for the FA20 heads, we had them flow tested a good bit ago (http://www.moto-east.com/main/fa20-h...vs-ported-wrx/) and the FA20 flows more than you'll generally need for most setups. I don't see any issue with the bigger displacement motor. Quote:
|
I am watching this thread. Rather go Hybrid FA20/24 block then a K swap when my current FA20 is done :)
|
Me too...
Quote:
Jaden Who wouldn't like to have a brand new short block with 30% more displacement for practically nothing other than a little elbow grease? p.s. you're in Mo Valley? I used to be the IT director for Moss bros. It's where I got my FRS... |
Quote:
I mulled it over a few weeks ago and ended up buying a Jack's Transmission. The real "solution" would be someone making a bell housing and rear trans mount that doesn't require welding (due to rulebook restrictions) to adapt a T5 or TKX to a FA. |
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
Fingers crossed this isn't just vaporware, because my ideal path is still a 2.4L swap rather than forced induction... ;) |
Quote:
|
Oh yes baby! Come on IAG. I will drop some coin on this if its cheaper than the K24 swap and dose not need significant re-wire etc...
|
My custom twin supercharger will likely bolt right up to the fa24, so if the swap becomes viable with or without the fa20 heads, it might be a go for me.
Although I would prefer to be able to use the fa20 heads, since I already have a spare set, could sell the working fa20 in the car and would only have to pay for an fa24 short block. Jaden |
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Any word from IAG about progress?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The supercharger should bolt in place on the 2.4 using the 2.4 heads. The exhaust manifolds bolt right up from first gens. Quote:
From what earlier reports have shown, the crank trigger wheel isn't compatible with first gen ECU's, and it looked like the design is different enough that you can't just swap on a first gen trigger wheel. It looked like a second gen ECU is needed, but if someone is going to make parts that work with the first gen ECU and physically bolt to the 2.4 then it could get interesting. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Sent from my SM-G781B using Tapatalk |
I'm also looking to do a FA24 swap, so far the biggest hurdle seams to be the crank sensor. I know they are different but is the crank plate that much different? Not sure if the ecu will read it or not... But someone did an Assent 2.4 swap and turbo into a crosstrek and used a wrx ecu to tune it up to 500hp so maybe it should be fine....
|
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
This user below bought one, maybe you can contact them on ig and see how they're doing it. They don't seem to be sharing info on forum etc. |
Just give it time. This will be far cheaper than a K24 swap. Smart people will figure it out :)
|
FYI Recycler sold the Fa24+trans dropout + cluster for 7.5K plus tax to give ppl an idea on prices
|
It'll be interesting to see how they hold up on track longer term
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The totaled GR86 I mentioned on this post: https://www.ft86club.com/forums/show...4&postcount=26 Got bought by a guy on the Facebook forum for $6600 who lives in Lithuania!!. https://www.facebook.com/groups/3908...00001310874847 We speculated at the time that the pole might have missed the engine/cranshaft or not but if you want to pull the engine and tow the car you can save / make a lot of money. GR86 seats are going for $1500 At this point maybe just wait for totaled GR corolla and get that G16E_GTS ( a lot of fabrication work obvi) |
Quote:
|
It will be interesting to see the FA24D swaps once there are more chassis out there and they come down in price. I don't see the engine ever being as "cheap" as a FA20D. Hmm $7500 really isn't a lot for a swap setup that drops right in and passed emissions vs $12k+ for the Kswap just to make the same power.
|
Quote:
That said, the paths to make a fairly reliable 250-300whp NA are pretty well charted for the K. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Not sure if people have been following EMS Tuning:
https://i.imgur.com/yDecbVO.png https://i.imgur.com/7yy0mT3.png https://i.imgur.com/QOZH8ld.png |
3 Attachment(s)
Quote:
The K swap is more expensive, but only if we consider the price tag out of context. The Kpower kswap comes with some other components like a header, aluminum driveshaft and such things that are necessary, but increases the cost and makes it not an apples to apples comparison to just doing a K24 swap. Plus, the FA24 swap might require an aftermarket ECU. Side by side, the stock power is similar, but we don’t know how the FA24 will handle boost. The K24 can do 450whp all day long without cracking open the motor, and is a softer limit. Higher power levels are not unheard of, but a basic build with piston n rods and ARP headstuds will do 700whp+. The FA20 was a harder limit of 350whp, but it wasn’t always too reliable, as I know, so most people do an engine build. The K swap allows more power with better reliability without having to do a build engine, so most people considering the K swap aren’t comparing the FA20/24 to the K24; they are comparing a FA20/24 + built engine + motor replacement/consumables, if it blows, versus a stock K24. We will have to see if the FA24 has fixed the oil starvation issues and if it can hold much more horsepower with reliability. |
Quote:
I think the fa24 will be great for someone that's either a diehard Subaru fan, or someone with a blown fa20 that just wants a oem upgrade. The k24 swap is definitely on the pricey side IF you have a stock car with blown engine and don't have any parts to sell. |
I'm into mine roughly $2.5k, but I had a supercharged motor setup with all of the goodies to part. Total cost right now is about $14.5k, but that includes a couple grand of parts that weren't required.
|
Quote:
Quote:
No, lie I completely forgot you can sell the current FA20 setup to help cover the cost. :bonk: |
Quote:
The engine is running and has been on the dyno. https://i.postimg.cc/bSPz90hP/EMS-FA20-FA24.jpg Facebook video of the engine running https://i.postimg.cc/23dj8tQS/EMS-FA20-FA24-2.jpg https://i.postimg.cc/2VzkqxGF/EMS-FA20-FA24-3.jpg |
Pretty awesome, FA20 Heads and FA24 Shortblock!
most likely FA20 ECU since its cracked already. I have serious doubts that the newer gen2 ECU can be cracked to the same point where anyone can load a tune with ODB anytime soon. The GR Yaris ECU apparently needs to be sent in to a tuner to get a tune flashed on there. sort of like a tethered jailbreak in the iOS world. Hold on to those gen1 ECUs! Quote:
|
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:32 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.