![]() |
NA first drive days for GR86 first week of August
Lol. No piped in engine noise or silly shift beeps (about the 2020)
Wrong and wrong. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
and I'll take piped in real noise over fake synthetic video game noise anyday. Plus i also like the sound of the FA20 over the FA24 at least from the vids. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Eh. I don’t really care either way because it’ll 99% sure get turned off on mine anyway. |
Quote:
Its the actual engine harmonics, live and all consistent with the real engine behaviour and stress from all of the dynamic real world shit going on. Sure you might not like the pitch they have chose to translate the engine sound but as far as authenticity of you hearing what is going on inside that engine its perfect. |
Everyone makes so much of this noise thing - its very meh for me but I sure as hell won't be focusing on it when I'm driving!
Can't wait. Can't wait. Can't wait. Must wait. |
I’m surprised people like the sound of a stock 1st gen. I personally thought it sounded grating and made the engine feel less willing to rev.
Love the sound on my 2013 now after a few easy mods (sound tube delete, 2017 oem header, trans mount bushing). Much smoother overall. Makes me want to redline it just to hear the engine rev out. The gr86 engine sounds a bit artificial but I’d have to hear it in person. I can already tell I like the sound better than a stock first gen though. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
These two engine are very different, at least based on my seat time in a 2017. My 2013 engine sounds like gravel in a blender. The catback helps to drown it out, though. Based on the various videos we have, including one with the augmented sound turned off, I would agree that a 2017+ engine has a more interesting mechanical noise. The 2022, with both the augmented sound turned off and on, was a lot smoother and sounded more pedestrian. Like it belonged in the Outback or Legacy. But I will have to hear it in person, obviously. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
1. chassis could be quieter - hence the need 2. lighter weight to have a small speaker than an entire sound tube system (which also previously had many of its components on top of the engine/high side in the engine bay) 3. cheaper to produce one speaker, mount, and assumably an onspeaker amp than producing all the tubing/mounting/clamps for the sound tube system: http://i.imgur.com/wyiTNJL.jpg |
1 Attachment(s)
Sound tube system weighted 1lb 8.5oz. Not sure how much the new speaker(-s) system weights, but it looks to me more complex and requires additional battery consumption.
|
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:11 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.