Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB

Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/index.php)
-   Tracking / Autocross / HPDE / Drifting (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=39)
-   -   Anyone mounted up 255/40R17 Nankang CR1s? (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=145265)

Turbo 05-09-2021 03:52 PM

Anyone mounted up 255/40R17 Nankang CR1s?
 
I've heard these fit VERY wide - like 275/285ish.


Curious what people's experiences have been with our platform? I have run 255/40R17 AR1s without any rubbing or issues, but they only ran a touch oversize I believe.


Also curious on feedback from anyone who has driven both these and A052's on track. A052s have pretty soft sidewalls - do the CR1s share this trait?

Breezio 05-09-2021 11:20 PM

Hoping to mount some up as soon as they arrive.

I'm not sure about the 255's, but a buddy running STS with 225's, his 225 Yoks are wider then his 225 CR-1s.

smg1138 05-10-2021 02:40 PM

I'm really interested to see how fast they are compared to the A052's. Tread design on them is very similar.

ZDan 05-10-2021 04:56 PM

https://philstireservice.com/wp-cont...CR-1-Specs.pdf
According to this, 255/40-17 have 259mm section width on 9" wheel.
I'm running 245/40-17 on 9" wheels, but to me they look wider than the 249mm shown here, I would have guessed 255 minimum, so...

Ran these at New Hampshire Motor Speedway (chicane/chicane) yesterday, did a best lap of 1:19.26, unfortunately not in my time trial... I ran 1:20.20 time trial same car on 245/40-17 RE71R a couple of years ago.

Breezio 05-11-2021 08:26 AM

Also, my 255 CR1s are arriving on Monday. I'll let you know when I get them mounted.

ZDan 05-11-2021 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZDan (Post 3431275)
I'm running 245/40-17 on 9" wheels, but to me they look wider than the 249mm shown here, I would have guessed 255 minimum, so...

Looking again, 249mm for section width seems about right, the sidewall is a lot more square which makes them look wide. 245/40-17 has 9.8" section width, 9.6" treadwidth, vs. A052 with 9.9" section width, 8.9" tread width.

jflogerzi 05-11-2021 11:00 AM

Just saw a YT video on this and they run wide. I'd you want to fit a 255 you should get a 9.5 inch wheel. 245 will fit nicely on a 9 inch wide rim

Sent from my GM1915 using Tapatalk

Chuckls 05-11-2021 07:58 PM

I have 255/40/r17 CR1 on my 17x9 Rays 57CR. what exactly are you looking for?

https://i.imgur.com/RQm7pIw.jpg

smg1138 05-12-2021 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZDan (Post 3431451)
Looking again, 249mm for section width seems about right, the sidewall is a lot more square which makes them look wide. 245/40-17 has 9.8" section width, 9.6" treadwidth, vs. A052 with 9.9" section width, 8.9" tread width.

Wait, the tread width is 9.6"? That seems really wide for a 245/40-17 :eyebulge:

NoHaveMSG 05-12-2021 05:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smg1138 (Post 3431971)
Wait, the tread width is 9.6"? That seems really wide for a 245/40-17 :eyebulge:

Works out about right. 9.6X25.4 = 243.84mm

My 245 RT660's just showed up and they measure about the same.

Turbo 05-13-2021 01:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chuckls (Post 3431706)
I have 255/40/r17 CR1 on my 17x9 Rays 57CR. what exactly are you looking for?

https://i.imgur.com/RQm7pIw.jpg


I'm concerned about rubbing issues, mainly.

I was fine with 255/40 AR1s and RS4s - just concerned about the CR1s, as I heard rumors the 255's runs especially wide. The 255 AR1s are sized closed to a traditional 265, for instance.


I'm also curious about feedback on sidewall stiffness compared to A052s, which are a bit soft.

Icecreamtruk 05-13-2021 01:43 AM

Dont know about CR1s, but 255 Falken Rt660 are wider than 275 Maxxis RC1.

ZDan 05-13-2021 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Turbo (Post 3432072)
I'm also curious about feedback on sidewall stiffness compared to A052s, which are a bit soft.

Feedback is good. I'd rate it better vs a052 with the caveat that I ran those on a 987. Cayman. Drawback is weight, the cr1 is about 3 lb heavier. Which according to data nullified any power gains I got from. Ace350 header and tune...

But enough more grip that I got fuel starvation coming out of turn 6 (180 degree banked left aka "the bowl) at NHMS at 7/8 tank, which has never happened before. Palpably more grip vs RE71R I used to run, or even 8-cycle Hoosiers I ran there last Fall

Turbo 05-13-2021 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZDan (Post 3432126)
Feedback is good. I'd rate it better vs a052 with the caveat that I ran those on a 987. Cayman. Drawback is weight, the cr1 is about 3 lb heavier.

Thanks, Dan.


How is the sidewall stiffness on the CR1? A052 are pretty soft in that respect.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:34 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.


Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.