![]() |
I could see myself buying a Supra. First a 86, than a Supra. :rolleyes:
I used to work for BMW in the eighties, when the brand stood for top German engineering. My first car was a 02 series and it sparked my car enthusiasm. Sadly they lost their way and quality went downhill fast due to cost cutting and poor management. I wouldn't touch one with a stick until now. I am hoping that Toyota has injected some reliability into the car and BMW some passion. Time will tell. |
Then*
|
Quote:
I've had 2 newer BMW's in the past 4 years (traded in the last one for the new few months back, so more like one), and there has been 0 issues with the car. Being honest, the 86/BRZ is likely more unreliable than new BMW's. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Excellent observation. Example: 2019 Corvette Stingray Coupe, 455 HP, 460 ft/lbs of torque, 7 speed manual transmission. 0-60 in 3.7 seconds. Base price $55,900 US. Of course, good luck finding a "base model". |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Here are some basic specs on these to keep in mind if you gonna compare. A90 Supra (base) Price: $49,990 Overall Length: 172.5 inches Curb Weight: 3,397 lbs HP/TQ: 335HP/365TQ AMG C63 Coupe Price: $68,750 Overall Length: 187.1 inches Curb Weight: 4,109 lbs HP/TQ: 469HP/479TQ M4 Coupe Price: $69,150 Overall Length: 184.5 inches Curb Weight: 3625 lbs HP/TQ: 425HP/406TQ Cayman Base (PDK) Price: $60.110 Overall Length: 172.4 inches Curb Weight: 3,010 lbs HP/TQ: 300HP/280TQ With that said, only one I see beating Supra in basic specs is Cayman... but even then, that's extra $10k more with less HP/TQ. Of course, I'm comparing with base model Supra. Even using Premium Supra ($53,990), base Cayman still cost $6k more. All other ones are gigantic boats! Costing more than other Toyota? In Japan, Supra RZ cost 6,900,000 yen. Keep in mind, Supra isn't regular Toyota. It's GR Supra, so it's brand off GRMN model. If you look at GRMN brand cars, GR 86 cost (4,968,000 yen) that's more than base model Supra (4,900,000 yen). TBH I can keep going at this number game... but reality is, number is one thing, feeling is another. Just like 86/BRZ, numbers doesn't justify all the driving feel. |
Quote:
For that price and with those looks, I would put my money on a RS3, brand prestige and at $56K (base), 174" long, 3,540lbs, 400bhp with a 3.5s 0 to 60mph and it will be faster than a Supra in dry, rain or snow. The Supra is just not a convincing case. A lot of people buy Toyota knowing that they are giving up a bit of the edginess in European cars as a trade off for reliability, but unfortunately that is out the door with the BMW engine and tranny. And as I said, I am not convinced by the argument that we should thank Toyota for bringing back the Supra even if it is a rebadged BMW because it's not profitable to build coupes. How does Akio explain the investment they put in the Lexus LC500, RC, NX? I love the 86/BRZ because it is truly something different and refreshing, Its selling point is that it is an agile, back to basic sports car. The Supra's selling point... its a Supra? see past that, it's really nothing original. They are just using a legendary badge as a marketing ploy... the Toyota version of Police Academy 5.... |
^ a bit unfair especially if you are a fan of the twins because in many ways the whole project and results are pretty comparable...I'm not a fan of the partnership either but chassis wise think we have to respect what they were able to bring to the market as it is Cayman sized (shortest wheelbase among current hardtop RWD coupes) while being the simpler FR config. And while I dislike it being AT only, I don't think the ZF8 will be an issue as this has been proven across multiple brands & models..it is a torque converter after all..
B58 is the only real concern here but we have to assume Toyota is totally aware their reliability image is always on the line for their products so you have to think it has been tested and checked. If you look up reliability stats and discussion on forums, so far it looks to be pretty decent. ..and "costs" way too much with a Toyota badge? Bruh, this is much cheaper than even the cheapest MSRP ever offered on a MKIV...and think there plenty of Sequoias, Tundras and Land Cruisers that have even higher prices.. |
My three problems with the Supra are in order:
01. Why get the Supra over the Z4? Z4 has optional extra power and a convertible top 02. No Manual transmission for Supra (Z4 will likely get one before the Supra if at all) 03. Styling and fake vents on a car that expensive My main question that you guys may be able to help me understand is: Why would someone who likes that platform buy the Supra over the Z4 (let's pretend the Supra isn't the more ugly sister)? |
I would choose a used first generation NSX with up to 50K miles for the same money over a Supra GR, without hesitation!
|
Quote:
02. That is the deal-breaker for me. But I would still not buy the Z4 for just the manual. 03. Styling & vents are things I can grow to love, even for $50K.. as long as I enjoy the drive. I was never a fan of the previous Supra look, and this one looks better than the MKIV to me. I don't really care for the BMW badge. I don't hate them, but I've had Toyotas all my life and don't mind it's badge in my driveway over a BMW. |
Quote:
2. Don't care. 3. The styling is nice. Show me another like it? Looks, Toyota tuning and hard top trump. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:37 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.