Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB

Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/index.php)
-   Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=59)
-   -   Sti Flexible Draw Stiffener- Differences (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=134087)

Clutch Dog 04-14-2019 02:41 PM

Sti Flexible Draw Stiffener- Differences
 
So after buying two sets of "Sti Flexible Draw stiffeners"
And being possibly the only guy to have both in hand at the same time.

The first set, you will see is Part Number: ST20118AS000
This is the part you will see on the STI.jp website: (Link:https://www.sti.jp/en/parts/subarubr.../ST20118AS000/)
and this is the part that is a direct bolt-in to my subframe as you will see below

The second set, you will see with the red tape came from a USDM 2018 BRZ tS
Requires: Part Number: 20101CA010 Subframe (2018 Brz tS, with premanufactured bolt holes)
This is not a bolt-in to my 13-16 FRS ( the mounting holes are not there)
Based on another set of photos from Elliot's tS, it looks like the tS has the mounting holes for it.
Unconfirmed, But I am wanting a 17+ twin subframe photo to confirm or deny that this will bolt in to those chassis, no modifications needed
Now this Draw Stiffener could work with any ZC/ZN chassis if you do not mind drilling holes.

Both function the same, both fit under the rear fiberglass under body panel, and both are adjusted the same as a standard adjustable Endlink

The First one-bolts into the car using hardware already installed on the car. it will use the left and right chassis bolt from the swaybar subframe assembly
and the front aluminum skid pan mounting bolts will attach it to. These bolts are standard M8x1.5.
I torqued them down to 32 ft lbs. the chassis bolts are torqued down to 44 ft-lbs
the second set of bolts that hold the feet to the sides of the car i used as alignment holes, and did not torque more than hand tight ( for me about 20 ft lbs)

(Click on the pictures for a bigger view)

https://i.ibb.co/SfhCb1t/0413191139.jpghttps://i.ibb.co/hFLcQRJ/0413191139b.jpg
13-16 Part is on the Left, Right is 2018 tS: Notice the Bolt spacing
https://i.ibb.co/d2Vv71t/0413191139a.jpg https://i.ibb.co/Zdwsjn9/0413191139c.jpg


https://i.ibb.co/TRrbq9g/0413191139d.jpg
Notice on the tS bolt on the right side is slotted

https://i.ibb.co/N345Jj2/0413191139g.jpg
https://i.ibb.co/BKPFM4G/0413191139h.jpg
The dampers are parallel on the TS stiffener
They are opposite on the STi unit

https://i.ibb.co/YcB0fGY/0413191244b.jpg
Mounting Pad for the 13-16 STi Stiffener
https://i.ibb.co/ch5jN5c/0413191244c.jpg
13-16 STi Stiffener Bolts up through the bottom of the subframe, the bolt holes are from the skid pan, no drilling necessary
https://i.ibb.co/VmwKkzL/0413191244d.jpg
Another photo, sorry for the lame phone pictures. I wish I had a lift.
https://i.ibb.co/TRF7khW/0413191244e.jpg
https://i.ibb.co/4dQB6sS/0413191245.jpg

The following is from a 2018 BRZ tS and the OE stiffeners on that unit.
https://i.ibb.co/Vq7mRSd/IMG-20190414-100017-743.jpg
Notice on the '18 Stiffener it bolts in from behind the brace going forward. Up from under the car
https://i.ibb.co/y011s1B/IMG-20190414-100009-177.jpg

https://i.ibb.co/qm91fqy/IMG-20190414-100011-450.jpg
This is the better of the side foot mounting, it only uses one bolt ( chassis bolt) and theres a lock out tab that goes up under the sway bar subframe.
This matches with the 13-16 as well, as the sway bar subframe is the same.

https://i.ibb.co/P4vLtKP/IMG-20190414-100015-892.jpg

Check the postings here on the BRZ tS parts page for more information or photos, not discussed here: http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?p=3093771
If any of you guys, have any more information, or want to correct me or add, please do so. I want to shed the most light on these parts as possible.

norcalpb 04-14-2019 09:14 PM

You need the 2018 Ts front crossmember, a 2017 front crossmember is the same as 13-16

Clutch Dog 04-15-2019 12:41 AM

So the Draw stiffener specifically from the tS, needs the tS subframe? well phooey,didnt think Subaru would do that to us.

That said Im pretty sure a drill and some lock nuts could fix that issue.

norcalpb 04-15-2019 02:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Clutch Dog (Post 3207668)
So the Draw stiffener specifically from the tS, needs the tS subframe? well phooey,didnt think Subaru would do that to us.

That said Im pretty sure a drill and some lock nuts could fix that issue.

20101CA010 - $215

I would strongly recommend against drilling, I would personally want the orientation of the bars to be 100% oem with no permanent holes.

JIM THEO 04-15-2019 07:17 PM

Without intention to hijack your thread may I ask, if I fit the STI flexible draw stiffener and STI flexible tower bar do I have the same result as with the stiffener and flexible V-bar?
I just bought the draw stiffener and the cost of the flexible tower bar is much lower than that of the V-bar while car is already equipped with V-bar (not flexible though).
I know STI suggests draw stiffener with the V-bar while it CAN be used with flexible bar but doesn't mention what the difference, if any, is between those two combinations.

Clutch Dog 04-22-2019 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JIM THEO (Post 3208008)
Without intention to hijack your thread may I ask, if I fit the STI flexible draw stiffener and STI flexible tower bar do I have the same result as with the stiffener and flexible V-bar?
I just bought the draw stiffener and the cost of the flexible tower bar is much lower than that of the V-bar while car is already equipped with V-bar (not flexible though).
I know STI suggests draw stiffener with the V-bar while it CAN be used with flexible bar but doesn't mention what the difference, if any, is between those two combinations.


I do not know, I am not a subaru engineer. I have the flexible tower bar and the drawer stiffener now and it just feels more darty, The V-brace I am sure would have similar effect, but OE we are given a hard mounted bar vs a dampened bar. So I am sure it is for NVH and feel.

My current set up is STI Drawer Stiffener, STI Flexible Tower Bar "F", and OE FRS V-Bar (hard mount)

And I will probably run this till the day I die. Feels so good now

JIM THEO 04-23-2019 02:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Clutch Dog (Post 3210678)
I do not know, I am not a subaru engineer. I have the flexible tower bar and the drawer stiffener now and it just feels more darty, The V-brace I am sure would have similar effect, but OE we are given a hard mounted bar vs a dampened bar. So I am sure it is for NVH and feel.

My current set up is STI Drawer Stiffener, STI Flexible Tower Bar "F", and OE FRS V-Bar (hard mount)

And I will probably run this till the day I die. Feels so good now

This is the setup I have in mind as I don't want to buy the more expensive flexible V bars while I already have from the factory bars there and just bought the draw stiffeners.
Guess no difference in NVH from the whole bars, am I wrong?

nikitopo 04-23-2019 02:51 AM

The flexible tower bar comes from earlier experience on AWD cars. It is good and can be used with the draw stiffeners, but it is not that good like the flexible v-bars. The flexible v-bars work better on a RWD car, but at the beginning they were not available and STI waited for the development. So, they used initially the stock v-bars which are not that solid and as an addition the tower bar. I remember reading this from the manufacturer, but I don't have the link now. Personally, I have the tower bar because at that time the other was not available. I don't know if the difference is that much to be noticeable, but the tower bar sounds a good cost trade off.

JIM THEO 04-23-2019 08:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nikitopo (Post 3210752)
The flexible tower bar comes from earlier experience on AWD cars. It is good and can be used with the draw stiffeners, but it is not that good like the flexible v-bars. The flexible v-bars work better on a RWD car, but at the beginning they were not available and STI waited for the development. So, they used initially the stock v-bars which are not that solid and as an addition the tower bar. I remember reading this from the manufacturer, but I don't have the link now. Personally, I have the tower bar because at that time the other was not available. I don't know if the difference is that much to be noticeable, but the tower bar sounds a good cost trade off.

That's what I read in the forum too just asked experiences if someone has tried both bars w/draw stiffeners, as I understand it flexible V-bars increase torsional rigidity that a RWD needs more as the back pushes the front creating diagonal forces while flexible strut tower bar helps on 4WD more where forces are more evenly distributed.

Clutch Dog 04-23-2019 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JIM THEO (Post 3210772)
That's what I read in the forum too just asked experiences if someone has tried both bars w/draw stiffeners, as I understand it flexible V-bars increase torsional rigidity that a RWD needs more as the back pushes the front creating diagonal forces while flexible strut tower bar helps on 4WD more where forces are more evenly distributed.

Well put

as far the general consensus.. I wish I had the extra funding for swanky STI V-bars.

For lateral flexing though, I will look at a trunk cross brace. Probably in house job, and painted sti red/pink

JIM THEO 04-23-2019 02:32 PM

My car is MY18 that is slightly reinforced in the rear end compared with MY13-17 cars so I may be stop there, actually I try to bring it to tS levels with as much parts as possible of it regarding suspension/chassis.

norcalpb 04-23-2019 04:54 PM

The sti V bars may be lighter than the standard v bars. I think the sti bars are hollow.

I’ll weigh both when I get home from work tonight.

norcalpb 04-23-2019 11:02 PM

So turns out the standard V-bars are 2lbs, and the TS V-bars are 2.8lbs

86MLR 04-24-2019 12:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JIM THEO (Post 3210887)
My car is MY18 that is slightly reinforced in the rear end compared with MY13-17 cars so I may be stop there, actually I try to bring it to tS levels with as much parts as possible of it regarding suspension/chassis.

Where is this "slightly reinforced" rear end compared to 2017?

You got any official drawings or P/N's?

Cheers


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:41 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.


Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.