| 86TOYO2k17 |
06-26-2019 09:49 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by FRSBRZGT86FAN
(Post 3227935)
@ ojuniour you realize this is an auto right? Those times are in line with that power level and this trans. Your number of being under 6 in an auto is way off.
Make sure your maf is scaled for the injen short ram, it's kind of a poor performer anyway it may be better to go back to stock and get a drop in. Also muffler delete doesn't do anything for power just brings out that uel sound. With e85 and the uel you are probably at 200 crank and 160-170 at the wheels.
The limiting factor here is the final drive is essentially different due to the trans gearing. Look into 4.56 or 4.88 gears for the rear diff and you'll get the numbers you are expecting. It puts 1-4 more in line if not past the gearing of the manual, and you will certainly get the times you are looking for.
|
Using dragy a much more accurate measuring tool then using the cars speedo especially if you don’t have stock wheels. I hit a verified 6.6sec on 92octane with my auto. Grimmspeed intake, Crawford billet blocks, ace 250 header, hks double res FP, CSG mxp catback, fensport oversized water/alt pulleys, CF driveshaft, 100lbs weight reduction, 4.56fd swap and custom OFT tune with 92octane
Pre 17s MT and AT have same 4.1 FD just MTs actual gearing is more aggressive and more closely spaced. 17+ MT got the 4.3 but gearing is still the same. You can’t change gear spacing with FD. Only final gear ratio aggressiveness. You will still shift into the same RPM regardless.
The 4.56 FD swap only took .2sec off 0-60, the problem is your about .4sec faster to top of 2nd but it’s now 57mph instead of 63 and you lose .2sec shifting resulting in only .2sec faster. The biggest difference the FD swap made is in 4th before it couldn’t pull at all in 4th was just to tall. 3rd hits 92 shift to 4th and fall on its face stock FD 4th hits 128. With 4:56fd 3rd hits 83mph shifts, and you need less power to accelerate at 83mph vs 92mph so you can pull hard still and then once you hit 95mph your back in peak powerband and keep pulling hard to top of 4th at 115mph.
But the biggest difference MT vs AT in 0-60 and 1/4mile is MT shaves an additional full second off from launching. Both stock neither launching at all MT is 8.1 AT is 8.2. MT with a launch can hit 6.4, AT 7.4. If AT could launch the same they’d be almost identical 0-60. The closer gearing helps more in the 1/4th but they would still be less then 1/2 second apart.
|