Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB

Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/index.php)
-   Engine, Exhaust, Transmission (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   Anyone runs aftermarket header with stock catback? (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=130914)

FLYFISHR 11-06-2018 02:14 AM

Looking for a little advice from those of you that installed a header to the stock overpipe. I got a second hand header without any hardware so I’ve bought the necessary gaskets but I have no idea what size/length of bolts I will need to attach the stock overpipe to the header. Can you help with advice as to what you used?

e_lunatic 01-05-2019 05:06 PM

I have UEL catless Gruppe-S +flash with stock everything else. So far I like it. it has the rumble but doesn't drone at all. I would like the rumble to be more pronounced but I'm going to get exhaust at some point for that. for now i really like it.

jflogerzi 01-19-2019 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stlgrym3 (Post 3149161)
After one week of daily commute with this setup I think I will go back with aftermarket catback again. Nothing wrong with stock catback, but starting to miss that deep growl once a while. Main targets are quiet catbacks with good build reputation. I’m down to two choices: Perrin 2.5 resonates or CSG Touring 86. I have ACE 350 header and stock front pipe. Which one would you pick?

Here would be my choices
R400
Perrin 2.5
MXP SP/ CSG touring

Sent from my ONEPLUS A5010 using Tapatalk

scottbrz 02-28-2023 11:26 PM

Figured I'd add to this thread since I just put my BRZ back to stock and traded it.

I ran a JDL catless UEL header with the corresponding OFT OTS tune for a while. There were no other modifications on the car (i.e., the rest of the exhaust was stock). I also made the JDL specific valve timing changes that I found on the forum to the tune.

Overall, I liked it. The car was legit faster in almost any scenario. It turned the original three part powerband (initial torque hit, dip, then torque's back...) into a two part powerband with a low and high end. Though, I swear the car lost torque between 2K and 2.5K rpm.

Regarding sound, I can see why some might not like it. It had a bit of a nasal quality to it. Overall, I was cool with it. If I were to do it again, I might go equal length, I'm not sure the uel rumble thing is for me. Regarding volume, a lot of people say it barely increases volume. I'd say it notably increases volume but it isn't too loud. I wouldn't want it any louder, but then again I'm a pretty understated person and like to exercise a vehicle without alerting everyone or drawing attention.

KillerBMotorsport 03-01-2023 07:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scottbrz (Post 3570619)
I'm not sure the uel rumble thing is for me. Regarding volume, a lot of people say it barely increases volume. I'd say it notably increases volume but it isn't too loud. I wouldn't want it any louder, but then again I'm a pretty understated person and like to exercise a vehicle without alerting everyone or drawing attention.

UEL and EL have different sound profiles because of changes in pressure pulse timing. EL is definitely quieter than UEL.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.


Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.