![]() |
Edelbrock Tune
Hello all, I recently got a Edelbrock supercharger installed on my car and got the car remote tuned by a tuner. The car has catless header, oil/radiator cooler, and is running on E85. I went to dyno the car today and was told that the car is running strong but too lean past 4k rpm. Just want another opinion since I have no knowledge in the tuning cars. Here are the graphs:
https://farm2.staticflickr.com/1970/...16c5ebd1_o.jpg https://farm2.staticflickr.com/1930/...4f198d97_o.jpg |
Ok if that AFR graph is accurate then its running 13.5-14 afr over 4000.
Even on E85 thats way lean for boosted (even lean for NA) you would want to be arround 12 over 5000 boosted on E85 under full throttle Id get it looked at |
Well, what did the tuner say?
|
It's Sunday so probably won't get a response back until tomorrow. Prior the dyno, I logged my car twice and the tuner provided revision map for each time, and in the second time I saw the knock correction factor at -1 and -2.1 during WOT so I asked and he said a little bit of knock is normal, thoughts on this?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
You have to run a log, target vs actual F/A ratio to ck if your MAF sensor/speed density scaling is correct. You have to log DI fuel, PI fuel, pump duty, total fuel ect and make sure the pump or injectors aren't maxed out. The stock system is good for around 240-250 HP So select most of the fuel options log a 3rd gear pull and send it to your tuner. You can plot the curves and should be easy to find the problem, either scaling or not enough fuel... |
The tuner who dyno my car told me it doesn't seem to be a fuel supply issue based on the shape of the A/F graph, something like it drops a bit right before 4000rpm then jumped back up :iono:
And the tuner who tuned my car told me before that the Edelbrock sensor (MAF?) doesn't work very well at high RPM and suggested me to get a Dbox from Delicious Tuning. And he found it odd that the A/F data from the log is off by 2 points of the data from the dyno, and he asked if I have cats on the car. Does he mean the cats are restricting air flow and causing problems? Will see if the tuner ask for specific data later. |
Quote:
i tuned a hks v2 with 44mm restrictor with totally stock fuel system, and he probably puts 315v or more at the crank |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Spent a little bit time to look at the last log I sent to my tuner, during the few pulls the A/F ratio stayed around 12 consistently. That was logged with ECUtek, is that reading accurate? If yes, how come it differ so much from the dyno reading?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:20 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.