Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB

Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/index.php)
-   Engine, Exhaust, Transmission (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   ACE A-350 dyno results - Did it deliver? (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=125559)

cjd 02-24-2018 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lantanafrs2 (Post 3049202)
So I'm wondering if something that lessens the torque dip from the top of the motor ie power blocks will have the ecu pull timing after a while?

Longer runners are good for low(er) rpm power - there is a direct correlating loss at high(er) rpm typically. I vaguely recall less impact with e85, so there's something in there that may allow more timing as well. Also don't remember noticing that power blocks do anything with the torque dip. That said, I'd not anticipate it causing timing to be pulled over time. I had a car with dual runners, and the longer runner ran from ~3000-5600rpm and the short runners everywhere else. At low rpm I guess runner length wasn't the primary benefit, but the volume change helped. Short runners were valved, long side not (always open).

I do suspect the torque dip is harmonics related based on the handful of things observed to change it, but I don't have the experience or background to be particularly confident.

I wonder if a dual catted Ace 4-2-1 would perform nearly as well, but that's a wild curiosity that'll never be answered. :)

nikitopo 02-24-2018 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Irace86.2.0 (Post 3049225)
I think it was the MR2, Supra, Corrola and Celica, and from Lexus, the LFA, LC500, ISF, GSF, RCF, SC Soarer and SC430 and from Scion the tC which is a stretch.

These Toyota cars were a long time ago. There wasn't any real sports car offering before our platform. Why do you think they contact Subaru? At that time they were selling mainly small cars, hybrids, mini-vans and they had a strong ecological heritage. I don't consider Lexus a performance brand, but mainly a premium or luxury brand. The LFA is an exemption and the motor was developed with the help of Yamaha. So, not entirely a Toyota product.

Irace86.2.0 02-24-2018 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nikitopo (Post 3049241)
These Toyota cars were a long time ago. There wasn't any real sports car offering before our platform. Why do you think they contact Subaru? At that time they were selling mainly small cars, hybrids, mini-vans and they had a strong ecological heritage. I don't consider Lexus a performance brand, but mainly a premium or luxury brand. The LFA is an exemption and the motor was developed with the help of Yamaha. So, not entirely a Toyota product.

Right, most of those models ended in the early to mid 2000’s after the Asian market crisis in the late 90’s and then the 2008 market collapse made sure sports cars would be rare, hence sport luxury sedans. The Lexus F line is like BMW’s M line, so pretty sporty, and they have been produced through the sports car hiatus.

Regardless, your point is that going forward Toyota will be producing sports cars with torque dips designed in their motors to give those motors economy and performance. I guess we will see when the new Supra comes out if there is a dip.

Of course the other explanation is that the torque dip is there as a byproduct of the other engineered components, and that the easiest thing to do is to market the dip as an intentional design to maximize fuel efficiency around town.

bfrank1972 02-24-2018 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cjd (Post 3049239)
Longer runners are good for low(er) rpm power - there is a direct correlating loss at high(er) rpm typically. I vaguely recall less impact with e85, so there's something in there that may allow more timing as well. Also don't remember noticing that power blocks do anything with the torque dip. That said, I'd not anticipate it causing timing to be pulled over time. I had a car with dual runners, and the longer runner ran from ~3000-5600rpm and the short runners everywhere else. At low rpm I guess runner length wasn't the primary benefit, but the volume change helped. Short runners were valved, long side not (always open).

I do suspect the torque dip is harmonics related based on the handful of things observed to change it, but I don't have the experience or background to be particularly confident.

I wonder if a dual catted Ace 4-2-1 would perform nearly as well, but that's a wild curiosity that'll never be answered. :)

Longer runners effectively compress the power band, one thing you'll see is the torque dip will get a little narrower, which helps with normal shift points as well as overall less rpm range where the engine is down on power. I suspect the thing with e85 and power blocks is that it can't take advantage of some of the changes as timing can always pretty much be optimal with e85. With pump, timing retard near the top end can be lessened when adding power blocks - above 6500 rpm you're starting to get out of optimal VE, cylinder pressures are less, which gives more room to advance timing from where it was before the blocks. That's where with careful tuning you can regain nearly all the top end losses introduced by the longer runners.

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

Harey 02-24-2018 03:23 PM

I don't understand how this is still a discussion?? 100% standard car, remove internals of cat in header and torque dip is gone.

steve99 02-24-2018 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lantanafrs2 (Post 3049202)
So I'm wondering if something that lessens the torque dip from the top of the motor ie power blocks will have the ecu pull timing after a while?


If its tuned correctly the ecu should rarely have to intervene to pull timing, during normal operation with correct fuel

Lantanafrs2 02-24-2018 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by steve99 (Post 3049341)
If its tuned correctly the ecu should rarely have to intervene to pull timing, during normal operation with correct fuel

Steve, are you running f.i. now? I'm thinking about doing it eventually and try to follow your posts because you know your business.

NRXRaptor 02-24-2018 09:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Irace86.2.0 (Post 3049259)
I guess we will see when the new Supra comes out if there is a dip.

I'm pretty sure the new supra is literally a re-skinned BMW M4

CSG Mike 02-24-2018 11:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nikitopo (Post 3049241)
These Toyota cars were a long time ago. There wasn't any real sports car offering before our platform. Why do you think they contact Subaru? At that time they were selling mainly small cars, hybrids, mini-vans and they had a strong ecological heritage. I don't consider Lexus a performance brand, but mainly a premium or luxury brand. The LFA is an exemption and the motor was developed with the help of Yamaha. So, not entirely a Toyota product.

They contacted Subaru because they want to minimize their cost and maximize their profits.

Teseo 02-25-2018 12:01 AM

Wow... this thread escalated so badly. From header and tune to blaming toyota. To keep on topic, a paper with a graph mean shit to op as long he is pleased on real scenario, in his case autocross. So im waiting patiently for his impressions /video

Irace86.2.0 02-25-2018 12:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Teseo (Post 3049439)
Wow... this thread escalated so badly. From header and tune to blaming toyota. To keep on topic, a paper with a graph mean shit to op as long he is pleased on real scenario, in his case autocross. So im waiting patiently for his impressions /video

We are exploring the possible source of the torque dip, while addressing the fact that this header and tune fixes it, while considering other means of sorting out the torque dip. It is not a one dimensional conversation, that is true, but it is good conversation nevertheless.

————-

Anyone have the other Ace headers dyno tuned side by side?

tennisfreak 02-25-2018 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NRXRaptor (Post 3049399)
I'm pretty sure the new supra is literally a re-skinned BMW M4

I'm pretty sure you are dead wrong.

There is a decent chance it will have the B58 inline turbo 6 the current m240i has in it.

Other than that its a new platform that is shared with the z4/5

EAGLE5 02-25-2018 02:18 PM

OH SHIT! Somebody on the internet is wrong.

Kordless 02-26-2018 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jordan Silveira (Post 3048898)
Man I wish I could test drive your car. I'm dying to know what a tune from Delicious and headers from Ace or elsewhere would do to this car.

You are in LA, I'm in LA... Hahahah lets make this happen.

Quote:

Originally Posted by bfrank1972 (Post 3048907)
lol this statement implies you have driven an 86 configured with every other header on the market :D

I've owned my fair share of all the popular ones. Tomei, JDL, Nameless.

I've driven others, Ft86speedfactory, Borla, Fujitsubo etc.

I should've changed my statement from all other to just the popular ones. I have not driven some crazy rare japanese headers or every single header out there, but definitely the most popular ones :)


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.


Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.