![]() |
17x9 vs 18x9.5 for track use?
I'm stuck between the benefits of each tire. The 18x9.5s can fit a 265, but weigh a tad more. The 17x9s are lighter, but are usually ran with a 245. Which is more important to you, lighter weight or more tire width?
18x9.5s http://i.imgur.com/6vyGtWx.jpg 17x9s http://i.imgur.com/NglXW58.jpg |
i am running 17x9 right now with a 245/40
i am planning on running 18x10 and 285/30R18 because everybody else does that who is competing in time attack and if i dont have the same level of rubber on the road i wont be competitive. it is what it is. |
Quote:
|
Honestly? If you're new to tracking stick with stock tires and wheels. You'll learn a ton about slip angles. People are too quick to put on sticky tires when starting to track.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Mmm stock power with 285?? Im run 17x9 with 245/40 and next i would go with a 255/40.
|
i wouldnt go over 225/40R18 on stock power.
i was 0.4 seconds slower on 245 than 225 on stock power. |
Quote:
|
17in tires being cheaper is a big reason to stick to 17s. 17x9 with a 200TW 245 or 255 is a lot of tire for an NA car.
|
Do you have that much power to need a 265 or wider tire? I know experienced drivers who have said they’re faster on a narrower tire.
|
225's on a 17x8 at stock power, unless you're only looking to be competitive in autox, then 17x9 with 245's.
|
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:44 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.