![]() |
MotorTrend's Head-2-Head MX-5 MiataRF vs. Toyota86
Overview https://youtu.be/NSq5Zb5ZNWY
2017 Toyota 86 MSRP: $26,255 as tested: ~$26,854 USD MPG: 21 city / 28 highway Horsepower: 205 hp @ 7,000 rpm, Torque: 156 lb-ft Engine: 2.0 L 4-cylinder Curb weight: 2,760 lbs Dimensions: 167″ L x 70″ W x 51″ H Tire size: P215/45R17 Option(s) equipped: Fog Lights $599 2017 Mazda MX-5 Miata RF club MSRP: $32,720 as tested: ~$36,130 USD MPG: 27 city / 34 highway Horsepower: 155 hp @ 6,000 rpm, Torque: 148 lb-ft Engine: 2.0 L 4-cylinder Curb weight: 2,445 lbs Dimensions: 154″ L x 68″ W x 49″ H Tire size: P205/45R17 Option(s) equipped: Brembo/BBS Package $3400 :sigh: Why would they not test a '17 BRZ LTD with STI lip kit and PP to make this a fair fight? I dont know :thumbdown: What are your guy's thoughts or predictions? Which car is going to have the best lap time? Better back-roads carver or city driving? Do we have people here who have driven the RF as well as a '17 86/BRZ? EDIT UPDATE: Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
86 will probably win as the better driver's car.
I think the RF will win, with the roofless experience and better interior quality winning the reviewers over. They should have used a PP BRZ. |
I test drove the RF and really liked it but the one I drove was close to $35,000. I didn't love it enough to spend that much. That's entering WRX STI territory. Wish it had the Recaro seats they get in Europe and a telescoping steering wheel. In the end, the price and lack of practicality caused me to keep my FRS.
Quote:
|
Quote:
Subaru where are my 2 ft-lbs of torque!? I NEED THOSE:bellyroll: https://preview.ibb.co/cLxqfk/Capture.png |
As close as I can come is driving a NC Miata for 8 years followed by driving my FR-S for 4 years.
My take is that the FR-S is a bit more practical, but the Miata is a bunch more fun. I figure the contest will be close. Their conclusion may be that if you like a roadster, get a Miata ..... if you prefer a coupe, get an 86. humfrz |
You can always cut the roof off your FR-S - not that I would recommend it.
|
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
humfrz |
Randy Pobst will be the test driver and he generally prefers the MX5 when we have these shootouts between Miata and 86. I just wish they'd put some decent F'ing tires on the twin and it would be a whole other deal
|
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Really, what were the chances that rock would fall, just as I was driving by ....:confused0068: humfrz |
It depends on the track. If they use something small and tight that will favor the miata.
I am sure they couldn't get a BRZ, or Toyota and Subaru have some kind of every other year plan when it came to which cars would go to the magazines. A few years ago everything was a BRZ, now it is probably Toyota's turn. |
Quote:
This new one is particularly stupid-looking. The lines are awkward, and the "face" on the front looks like a stoner saying, "Dude, what?" And Mazda knows they screwed it up. If you look at the main Miata page on the Mazda website, there's not a single pic of the hideous front end. You have to dig into the gallery to see what the front end actually looks like. And even then, they have all the thumbnails of the front end cropped so you can't see it clearly. They know it's ugly, so they hide it. Again, driving an ugly car is okay if the performance is there. But the comment was made that the MT reviewer would likely judge it on aesthetics as well. Aesthetically there's no contest. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:06 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.