Quote:
Originally Posted by Calum
(Post 2853455)
Would you, please, take a dB reading using the same techniques as you use with the ACE/CSG exhaust, using the CSGxMPX with an ACE header and front pipe? Or could you give any information on the dB difference between the two, something quantitative? What's the MPX muffler makeup? Is it packed or is it baffled, and what material?
I want my car to remain quiet. But if I'm only giving up a couple of dB I might go for the MPX setup considering it's about half the cost.
|
We do not have a quantitative comparison yet. Environmental and ambient conditions can change dB output as well. As noted, some cars who pass under the 90dB radar on a clear day at Laguna Seca may get flagged on a partly cloudy day so it's not ALWAYS 100% guaranteed that aftermarket exhaust systems will pass, but a quick qualitative comparison indicates that the ACExCSG will pass quite easily and the CSGxMXP may be capable of hitting that limit or just over it with a full catless system and supercharger.
We do have some plans in the future to acquire a special dB meter for quantitative comparison of the two exhausts, but please keep in mind, the CSGxMXP TOURING86 competition exhaust was never developed or commissioned to be a sub-90dB unit.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Timmy_Jones
(Post 2853469)
Is this a full 2.5" ID setup? Any power gained over the stock catback, with a header installed?
|
70mm / 2.75 inches. We generally do not consider catbacks as a powerhouse modification, but for high output NA and FI engines, it can potentially free up a couple ponies due to less restriction. We have noticed the throttle response opened up quite nicely on our 395hp JRSC powered BRZ.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vital
(Post 2853474)
I am curious about this as well isnt 2.75 inch too much for NA power? Thats almost 3 inches
|
No. On other platforms that we have extensive testing with, the 70mm is a good compromise between 2.5" and 3" (obvious) in terms of power delivery, throttle response, exhaust note, and fitment. Again, our aim is not for absolute power maximization or exhaust sound output minimization. The CSGxMXP TOURING86 is designated strictly as a solid option for clean exhaust note but not stupid loud enough to kill your date.
Quote:
Originally Posted by churchx
(Post 2853533)
Gains are also there in loudness, so one should double check going 3" route, IF car's exhaust will stay still within tolerable loudness levels for those extra .. hmm, 5whp?
|
We generally do not consider catbacks as a powerhouse modification, but for high output NA and FI engines, it can potentially free up a couple ponies due to less restriction. This low restriction exhaust was purely for good aero and excellent sound production. :)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calum
(Post 2853555)
This.
I want an exhaust that will be honestly quiet while not causing more restriction than stock, but being able to put up with the abuse of a header and front pipe. We've all heard how bad the stock exhaust is with a header and free flowing front pipe. I highly doubt there will be any noticeable power gain from this, though.
|
The guys going to this exhaust are coming from stock OEM, Perrin, Invidia, GReddy, and T1R single. There will be more, but it has been noted to be more pronounced than OEM and quieter than Perrin and GReddy on full catless. :)