Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB

Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/index.php)
-   Forced Induction (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=78)
-   -   FI for 2017 models? (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=112777)

gtengr 11-09-2016 04:34 PM

FI for 2017 models?
 
Is there a timeline for when turbo/supercharger kits will be available? My understanding is the ecu tuning isn't quite sorted due to ecu revisions.

Amputechture 11-09-2016 04:40 PM

Pretty hardware will be compatible with all the existing kits, it's the Calibration ID of the ECU.

Matt@Cosworth 11-09-2016 05:06 PM

I'm getting whispers that the 2017 car with its pretty new inlet manifold is different to the previous years so its possible that some SC kits may not fit

hoping to confirm this one way or another soon

CSG Mike 11-09-2016 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt@Cosworth (Post 2793281)
I'm getting whispers that the 2017 car with its pretty new inlet manifold is different to the previous years so its possible that some SC kits may not fit

hoping to confirm this one way or another soon

The red manifold fits on 13-16 engines; its a direct bolt-on.

Matt@Cosworth 11-10-2016 03:15 AM

well thats reassuring
thanks for letting me know
has anyone dyno'd the swap to see if there's a difference?

ajc209 11-10-2016 05:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt@Cosworth (Post 2793685)
well thats reassuring
thanks for letting me know
has anyone dyno'd the swap to see if there's a difference?

Moto east tested it on a pre 2017 car running a big turbo and saw 15-20hp increase

https://www.facebook.com/motoeast/po...07288429318735

gtengr 11-10-2016 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ajc209 (Post 2793704)
Moto east tested it on a pre 2017 car running a big turbo and saw 15-20hp increase

https://www.facebook.com/motoeast/po...07288429318735

Interesting! I wonder how the centrifugal setups will respond at typical boost pressures. For me the decision is between centrifugal and twin screw.

Xxyion 11-10-2016 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ajc209 (Post 2793704)
Moto east tested it on a pre 2017 car running a big turbo and saw 15-20hp increase

https://www.facebook.com/motoeast/po...07288429318735

I cant imagine that those are acurate numbers. how does the 2017 only get a 5hp increase...but bolt it on a 16' or lower and you get 15-20? Doesnt make sense imo.

yelsew 11-10-2016 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xxyion (Post 2793895)
I cant imagine that those are acurate numbers. how does the 2017 only get a 5hp increase...but bolt it on a 16' or lower and you get 15-20? Doesnt make sense imo.

This wasn't an NA twin, it was a turbo build, so it isn't the same comparison.

ajc209 11-10-2016 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xxyion (Post 2793895)
I cant imagine that those are acurate numbers. how does the 2017 only get a 5hp increase...but bolt it on a 16' or lower and you get 15-20? Doesnt make sense imo.

On an N/A car it may only be worth 5hp (or less) but in the link it was a 443hp car with a big turbo! At those power levels, which is much higher airflow than the stock part was designed for, its perfectly reasonable to see 15-20hp IMO

Shinigami301 11-10-2016 01:14 PM

There's an increasing body of evidence indicating that the real 2017 NA power increase is more on the order of 18-20 BHP rather than the claimed 5. More dyno runs will help tell if that's true.

brzaapi 11-10-2016 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ajc209 (Post 2793902)
On an N/A car it may only be worth 5hp (or less) but in the link it was a 443hp car with a big turbo! At those power levels, which is much higher airflow than the stock part was designed for, its perfectly reasonable to see 15-20hp IMO



This^^^

But to piggy back on that comment. The car has been rated at 205 BHP, but there have been dynos showing that the '17MY actually puts down more than 5 extra HP or TQ to the wheels than the previous years. Is there substantial proof of this, nope, but enough that it is very possible the revised car puts out more than advertised. Of course there are many more reasons for this than just the intake manifold.

ajc209 11-10-2016 01:59 PM

Well the older FA20 was 10-15hp down on the claimed 197hp, so the new engine looks to be actually outputting the rated power now then.

The intake manifold is only part of the changes though, new mapping intake and exhaust header all play a part.

Matt@Cosworth 11-10-2016 07:40 PM

agreed
it looks like from the scanty data so far that the tune has been revised on the latest cars to be far less conservative, that coupled with the different manifolds looks to mean they now actually make what is claimed for them
whereas the earlier cars do not


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:49 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.


Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.