![]() |
Just some fun stats on boxer motors
1 Attachment(s)
|
Moral of the story: I want a turbo
|
Quote:
|
If you want some interesting comparisons, then add columns for mass and power to weight ratio.
Then add 86 RGM S/C low boost 9psi, 86x86, 2.0L, 300bhp, 315Nm, 1220kgs And add 86 RGM S/C med boost 11psi (1 size smaller pulley), approx 86x86, 2.0L, 360bhp, 370Nm, 1220kgs |
Quote:
I've got a turbo Forester and an SC 86, and I'll take the SC any day :) The whoosh of power when a turbo kicks in feels great, but... All that glitters isn't gold. |
Quote:
|
Meh just imagine if the 86 had 2 more cylinders it would have been a 3L 307.5bhp beast. And maybe with higher compression 12.9:1 pistons!!!
|
They're already not liking our fuel, raising the compression even further would be interesting.
2.5 FA25 wit direct & port injection, same compression would be awesome. |
Quote:
|
What gives, no Crickets column :iono:
|
Quote:
Sounds like crickets are a US thing...? The only chirping my car does is the rubber variety :) My fuel pump does sound a bit rattly at times, but it's been like that for years. Whatever... :) No stress. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Driving around Red Star with worn street tyres and stock power... I just kept thinking to myself.. "holy crap, I love this car!" |
Quote:
[ame="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=maZyPJIOknE"]Engine Knock Sound - Explained - YouTube[/ame] Our cars are severely retarded on 95 fuel, and does not show the full picture. I use Liqui Moly octane booster sometimes and there is a big difference, but that being said I believe the ECU is factory tuned specifically for the coast. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:57 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.