Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB

Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/index.php)
-   Engine, Exhaust, Transmission (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   2017 Red Manifold (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=110491)

BrunoCr7 09-09-2016 03:06 PM

2017 Red Manifold
 
So I was at the dealership to buy my new 17 brz and I noticed the show car didn't have a red manifold and it was auto transmission but the week before I was at another dealer and they had a manual transmission and it had a red painted manifold, does the manual have red and the auto not?

Zaku 09-09-2016 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BrunoCr7 (Post 2749443)
So I was at the dealership to buy my new 17 brz and I noticed the show car didn't have a red manifold and it was auto transmission but the week before I was at another dealer and they had a manual transmission and it had a red painted manifold, does the manual have red and the auto not?

That's correct, the automatic has no changes to engine so there's no red manifold only manual cars have those.

Zoh 09-09-2016 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zaku (Post 2749448)
That's correct, the automatic has no changes to engine so there's no red manifold only manual cars have those.

Exactly this.
The automatic is the same engine as previous years, so the red intake manifold is only on the manuals.

I remember reading that they couldn't get the Auto to pass certain noise level requirements when downshifting, so they had to keep the same engine as last year. (Or something to that effect, if I recall correctly)

Ernest72 09-10-2016 01:53 PM

The color red in the manifold provides that 5hp gain. ��

Pickleahoy 09-10-2016 09:48 PM

Thats your punishment for buying an automatic :paddle:

new2subaru 09-10-2016 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zoh (Post 2749793)
Exactly this.
The automatic is the same engine as previous years, so the red intake manifold is only on the manuals.

I remember reading that they couldn't get the Auto to pass certain noise level requirements when downshifting, so they had to keep the same engine as last year. (Or something to that effect, if I recall correctly)

That doesn't make sense. Whether the the car is a manual or an AT being driven in manual, they will make the same noise level.

There's something up with the 2017 Auto...They're giving "more power" and a different rear end to the manual. My guess is they're just trying to appeal to a different market with the AT.

Manual gets a RED one AT gets a black one...:)

Tcoat 09-10-2016 10:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by new2subaru (Post 2750397)
That doesn't make sense. Whether the the car is a manual or an AT being driven in manual, they will make the same noise level.

There's something up with the 2017 Auto...They're giving "more power" and a different rear end to the manual. My guess is they're just trying to appeal to a different market with the AT.

Manual gets a RED one AT gets a black one...:)

The have two different engines and diffs adds production costs so I doubt it is a marketing ploy. "Hey you want AT? Well we kept the power and acceleration down to your level" won't sell many extra cars.
I have never heard of a noise requirement that would have such a fine line that an AT would fail and a MT pass. I am guessing that it is more likely a mileage or emissions requirement issue that would cost more to correct with the AT then it costs to have two engines in the system.

new2subaru 09-10-2016 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tcoat (Post 2750403)
The have two different engines and diffs adds production costs so I doubt it is a marketing ploy. "Hey you want AT? Well we kept the power and acceleration down to your level" won't sell many extra cars.
I have never heard of a noise requirement that would have such a fine line that an AT would fail and a MT pass. I am guessing that it is more likely a mileage or emissions requirement issue that would cost more to correct with the AT then it costs to have two engines in the system.

I agree with you. Are there really two different engines? Or, is it the 4.3 rear end causing an issue with emissions/mileage in the AT? Purely guessing here but none of this makes sense.

Tcoat 09-10-2016 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by new2subaru (Post 2750405)
I agree with you. Are there really two different engines? Or, is it the 4.3 rear end causing an issue with emissions/mileage in the AT? Purely guessing here but none of this makes sense.

There are two engines. Even the car configuration sections of each Twin shows the AT with the old engine specs.

new2subaru 09-10-2016 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tcoat (Post 2750406)
There are two engines. Even the car configuration sections of each Twin shows the AT with the old engine specs.

Okay, but why? 5 extra HP can't go into an AT? Old engines laying about? Unlikely.

Kinda funny when you think about it and not believable.

Tcoat 09-10-2016 10:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by new2subaru (Post 2750408)
Okay, but why? 5 extra HP can't go into an AT? Old engines laying about? Unlikely.

Kinda funny when you think about it and not believable.

If I was privy to all Toyota/Subaru's business plans I would be worth millions. We may never really know but I am sure that there is a legit reason for it since neither company is a Mom and Pop operation making random or unwarranted decisions. It really isn't something open for debate or to be disbelieved by anybody.

Zoh 09-11-2016 01:55 AM

"... Buyers who order an automatic transmission will have to make do with the previous 200-hp engine and 4.10:1 final drive; engineers tell us the automatic cars could not clear pass-by noise regulations during downshifts with the new engine..."

http://www.caranddriver.com/subaru/brz

Just stating what I read. :)

Spec C Wannabe 09-11-2016 06:17 AM

My thought is that Toyota/Subaru have too many old parts left in their bin so they would like to empty the stock. My guess is that the red manifold together with other engine upgrades will come with the A/T in the future, like 2018 till the end of production of current BRZ/GT86.

mav1178 09-12-2016 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by new2subaru (Post 2750405)
I agree with you. Are there really two different engines? Or, is it the 4.3 rear end causing an issue with emissions/mileage in the AT? Purely guessing here but none of this makes sense.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tcoat (Post 2750406)
There are two engines. Even the car configuration sections of each Twin shows the AT with the old engine specs.


Most likely the MY2017 engine block is the same, the manifolds are different.

The old engine and new engine had same overall specs, and nothing different about the combustion chamber shape or burn characteristics. The manifold changes would've necessitated a change in ECU timing and fuel maps, hence the "AT with old engine peripherals and MT with new peripherals" as something that points to emission-related engineering requirements.

-alex

ichitaka05 09-14-2016 02:15 PM

If you want that red intake manifold, you can buy it and install it on your AT car. iirc you can swap em out.

WorldRallyB 09-14-2016 05:05 PM

Has someone figured out what the small unfinished 'tabs' are for on the manifold?
Maybe an engine cover that's coming out next year?

https://a.gaw.to/photos/2/5/7/257626...Subaru_BRZ.jpg

..I've already had one person asked me whats suppose to be there

goldenfri 09-14-2016 05:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WorldRallyB (Post 2753035)
Has someone figured out what the small unfinished 'tabs' are for on the manifold?
Maybe an engine cover that's coming out next year?

https://a.gaw.to/photos/2/5/7/257626...Subaru_BRZ.jpg

..I've already had one person asked me whats suppose to be there

I've already answered this, its for the top mount intercooler for the BRZ STI, duh. ;)

yelsew 09-14-2016 06:01 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by WorldRallyB (Post 2753035)
Has someone figured out what the small unfinished 'tabs' are for on the manifold?
Maybe an engine cover that's coming out next year?

Those tabs look to be in the same position as the tabs on the previous gen intake manifold.
Attachment 143027

Yoshoobaroo 09-14-2016 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WorldRallyB (Post 2753035)
Has someone figured out what the small unfinished 'tabs' are for on the manifold?
Maybe an engine cover that's coming out next year?

https://a.gaw.to/photos/2/5/7/257626...Subaru_BRZ.jpg

..I've already had one person asked me whats suppose to be there

The new manifold is probably shared with other Subarus to increase the commonality of parts as they adopt the FA20 engine as well. I wouldn't be surprised if that's where the intercooler bolts onto on a WRX or a Forester.

-Josh

Bowen 09-16-2016 02:10 PM

I'm gonna swap out my intake manifold for a red one once I can get my hands on one :D

funwheeldrive 09-16-2016 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WorldRallyB (Post 2753035)
Has someone figured out what the small unfinished 'tabs' are for on the manifold?
Maybe an engine cover that's coming out next year?

https://a.gaw.to/photos/2/5/7/257626...Subaru_BRZ.jpg

..I've already had one person asked me whats suppose to be there


Aren't those the tabs where the plastic cover attaches too?


http://drivencarreviews.com/wp-conte...n_fr-s_010.jpg

FrostedFlakes 09-16-2016 04:22 PM

This might be a worth while upgrade, as I read somewhere that the red intake manifold is slightly bigger than the old plastic one.

Teseo 09-16-2016 04:30 PM

Dyno proof?

deejaylew 09-16-2016 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Teseo (Post 2754560)
Dyno proof?

Proof of what?

You couldn't prove that the red intake is responsible for anything as there have been too many other changes to the motor. That 5-15 whp could be coming from many different things. Lets just enjoy the fact that metal is better than plastic :)

deejaylew 09-16-2016 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Norville Rogers (Post 2754571)
Why?

Things made of metal are generally perceived to be of better quality.

Bowen 09-16-2016 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Norville Rogers (Post 2754550)
Why?

Cause I think it looks better.

Judging from your previous posts, I'll be waiting for a snarky response.

Teseo 09-16-2016 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by deejaylew (Post 2754566)
Proof of what?

You couldn't prove that the red intake is responsible for anything as there have been too many other changes to the motor. That 5-15 whp could be coming from many different things. Lets just enjoy the fact that metal is better than plastic :)

So more weight for nothing?

deejaylew 09-16-2016 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Norville Rogers (Post 2754573)
I'd prefer suitability of application rather than perceived quality when it comes to engineering. Each to there own.

Have you noticed it's red...cool.

I honestly think you just prefer the one that you own over the one that you don't own.. but I don't know you.

deejaylew 09-16-2016 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Teseo (Post 2754575)
So more weight for nothing?

Possibly, maybe not. You should buy one and let us know.

Teseo 09-16-2016 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by deejaylew (Post 2754584)
Possibly, maybe not. You should buy one and let us know.

Then i will need to retune. Im more interested with the headlights

funwheeldrive 09-16-2016 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by deejaylew (Post 2754566)
Proof of what?

You couldn't prove that the red intake is responsible for anything as there have been too many other changes to the motor. That 5-15 whp could be coming from many different things. Lets just enjoy the fact that metal is better than plastic :)



It would be nice if someone bolted a revised manifold to an older 86 to see if it provides any improvement in power.


The car is still too new though. Give it a month or two.

FX86 09-16-2016 06:55 PM

red is usually fast ...like woman that wear red lipstick so it must be better

wbradley 09-16-2016 06:58 PM

Sounds like an expensive mod for no performance improvement. I do understand buying a Velox or something, but red lipstick on a manifold wont get my money.

I wonder what ITBs look like on a boxer.

new2subaru 09-16-2016 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wbradley (Post 2754699)
Sounds like an expensive mod for no performance improvement. I do understand buying a Velox or something, but red lipstick on a manifold wont get my money.

I wonder what ITBs look like on a boxer.

http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showp...7&postcount=45

Not bad

g e 09-16-2016 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wbradley (Post 2754699)
Sounds like an expensive mod for no performance improvement. I do understand buying a Velox or something, but red lipstick on a manifold wont get my money.

I wonder what ITBs look like on a boxer.

But red lipstick on boxer shorts is priceless.

WorldRallyB 09-16-2016 10:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wbradley (Post 2754699)
Sounds like an expensive mod for no performance improvement. I do understand buying a Velox or something, but red lipstick on a manifold wont get my money.

I wonder what ITBs look like on a boxer.

Quote:

Originally Posted by funwheeldrive (Post 2754606)
It would be nice if someone bolted a revised manifold to an older 86 to see if it provides any improvement in power.


The car is still too new though. Give it a month or two.

The entire intake system has been redesigned, including the manifold to include better airflow going from a oval cross sectional area to a circular design that makes for a more efficient system. Its not just pretty red paint.

And oh.. the air filter, the valves, cam shaft, piston heads, engine block, fuel pump, exhaust manifold have all seen revisions

funwheeldrive 09-16-2016 11:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WorldRallyB (Post 2754814)
The entire intake system has been redesigned, including the manifold to include better airflow going from a oval cross sectional area to a circular design that makes for a more efficient system. Its not just pretty red paint.

And oh.. the air filter, the valves, cam shaft, piston heads, engine block, fuel pump, exhaust manifold have all seen revisions

I know. I read the brochure too.

Aluma007 09-17-2016 12:28 AM

I saw a youtube video of the yellow series...the engineer said that they advertise 5hp, but its more like 15hp increase to put the engine where it should have been in the first place.

mazeroni 09-17-2016 01:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aluma007 (Post 2754886)
I saw a youtube video of the yellow series...the engineer said that they advertise 5hp, but its more like 15hp increase to put the engine where it should have been in the first place.

http://i.imgur.com/yH9HeX3.jpg

Definitely not 15 according to Toyota's marketing material. You see more torque in the mid-range and at the top, but HP gains are marginal - possibly offset by added weight. Unless their reported figures are conservative. But until we get actual dyno results from an owner... The red manifold does about as much as cheetah blood or flame stickers :cheers:

Bristecom 09-17-2016 03:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mazeroni (Post 2754919)
Definitely not 15 according to Toyota's marketing material. You see more torque in the mid-range and at the top, but HP gains are marginal - possibly offset by added weight. Unless their reported figures are conservative. But until we get actual dyno results from an owner... The red manifold does about as much as cheetah blood or flame stickers :cheers:

Frankly, I'm kind of surprised they managed to only get about 5 hp and lb-ft torque out of it. I mean, a drop in filter alone usually adds around that and they improved not only the filter design but also the intake, exhaust, lowered friction, and optimized other things but yet.. minimal gains. You had one job Toyota/Subaru! :paddle:

Oh well... at least it's something.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:21 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.


Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.