![]() |
the windshield glass didnt even crack!! wow!
|
Quote:
On the other hand, if a lighter/smaller vehicle collides with a heavier one, occupants of the former always have relative disadvantage. That's pure physics. Another aspect is that many large vehicles have their bumpers far to high to provide protection for occupants of smaller vehicles. It's semi trailers, many large trucks and delivery trucks, school buses, raised pickups, some SUVs. If you rear-end them even in a well designed car, chances are that you are screwed because all your crumple zones will underride the large vehicle's bumper and the main hit will be on your A pillars, windshield, and face. |
Never once concerned about the saftey. Subaru's have been building some of the best designed in terms of saftey cars on the road for the last 15+ years. The twins are no different.
|
Yeah definitely. As much damage as my front end took. It wasn't leaking any fluids and the cabin was completely intact.
|
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Take a look at these hoods and see what is in common. http://i.imgur.com/a5KjbWJ.jpg http://i.imgur.com/bLyXkTv.jpg http://www.ft86club.com/forums/attac...1&d=1473218474 Notice how they are all bent in exactly the same spot with the front folded down? That is the engineered buckle points at work. DON'T mess with them no matter how bad you want that vent cut right there! Also be cautious of knock off fiberglass or fake carbon fiber hoods since they do not have buckle points and in the event of a crash can end up intact in your back seat. Even if you were in the way. |
To that same point, don't think about using hood risers. They defeat the engineering under the hood that makes the hood buckle and not rise up, go through the glass and behead the driver.
|
I wouldn't be surprised for the twins that have been totaled over a decent amount of them are bought back on the road. That's the testament of how durable this car is.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Quote:
Any modern car is 'safe' relative to history. Air bags, sophisticated crumple zones, 'smarter' seat belts and accident avoidance systems (autonomous braking for the win!) see to that but they are still playing with the rules of basic physics, just optimizing every layer possible until the inevitable energy gets to you (or leaves you?). It may have been on this forum that I read about the Mercedes sonic trauma prevention system. I think it's the E-Class emits are loud pulse prior to imminent collision to brace your ear drums and protect your hearing from the bang of the crash. Trippy. But rules is rules, and might has right. I'll put my family in a 2013 5,000 lb Tundra than a 2017 2,800 lb BRZ if they are both heading towards one another at 65 mph. That being said, I, too, think Subaru's in general have a higher degree of intelligent safety design in their chassis and are built are more 'real life' scenarios than simply passing with the high test scores on standardized safety exams. |
Quote:
http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/2016...bd9dd090d5.jpg My once totaled car is living a full life as a (future) Spec86 car. All for the low price of about $3500. That includes buy back from insurance, and all the repairs. Sent from my ONE A2005 using Tapatalk |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:42 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.