| ScoobsMcGee |
08-05-2019 06:12 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irace86.2.0
(Post 3244814)
Advertising should be close to the expectation, and the expectation should be close to the outcome. If someone says CARB pending then that should reflect a timeline consistent with the word pending. It creates an expectation that the CARB tune is finalized, the testing might even be finalized, that they are just pending the outcome of the analysis or waiting for official documents stating the car passed. Maybe this is the case, and the process is taking three years, but I believe a more appropriate description would have been to say that the company was working on development of a CARB kit, so as not to lead the consumer into a false expectation.
Imagine buying something online and then, instead of the order status moving from processed to delayed-at-port or backordered, clearly describing the situation, it just said pending shipping... forever. Your patience could wear thin. I’m getting there. I’m just fortunate that California extended the smog requirement two more years.
|
My point was that they may have registered Harrop USA in order to help finalize the process. I can understand why you're frustrated, and am not saying it isn't warranted.
I do work a lot with both government and industry specific regulations (e.g. HIPAA, PCI, GDPR, SOX, ISO), and in many cases the people doing the certification don't fully understand the subject matter, so if A does not exactly match B, it fails. Maybe to offer some blind hope, Harrop USA may have been registered to help get around misunderstandings with the company being based in Australia. Entirely possible that it is irrelevant, but maybe not.
|