Mav is right. We have absolutely no idea if the OP here is the scammer, and we have to give @ LTuned the benefit of the doubt.
For reference, here is LTuned's post from his other thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LTuned
There are two sides to every story. The accident was disclosed, visual inspection and test drive completed and price discussed. A deposit was never requested. Upon hearing two other people were interested in seeing the car the same day the seller requested that the other people be turned away with an on the spot cash deposit. He had previously lost out on another FRS and did not want to lose this one. There was no paperwork. We depart and the other interested parties are declined. The buyer texts about picking up the car on Friday and ensuring UVIP is ready. Then the Buyer inquiries more about the accident. The VIN is provided followed by three photos of the list of parts from insurance. Buyer then offers a lower price stating this is what a body shop recommended. The low price is declined. Buyer then requests deposit back. This is declined due to non-refundable deposit. An agreement is made to inquire on the two other interesting parties and return deposit if one is interested; one purchased a BRZ and the second is too busy and declines. Buyer demands deposit back. He disagrees with the condition of the deposit and threatens legal action. He then states this is a scam as the car was posted in December and is not worth the price. After discussions, an EMT of $250 is sent to buyer to settle the disagreement on the deposit. The buyer accepts the $250. Buyer then sends threats for remaining $250. In which contact is cut and phone number of lawyer is provided.
|
I won't point fingers here; however, there are two questions that I'd like to know:
1. To what extent was the accident disclosed when mentioned for the first time? How much information was requested about it, if any?
2. Why is the seller posting in third-person, assuming this is the seller?
|