Very interested in something like this.

norcalpb: as in, what a shame? Yes, i use group n topmoints, but i might aswell have used stock top mounts. Group n ones are not excentric in same fashion as stock mounts, just of stiffer rubber (and also btw Com-Cs supposedly are of same more rigid rubber as Group N ones). That eccentric bushing i mentioned goes in front LCA rearmost end. NVH with pillowball camplates was issue for me too, so i'm happy to had managed to get -3 w/o slotting or camberplates.

Please. Seriously.

I would love to see this come through the pipes!

My com-c's have been on the car for like 6-7 years now, although I've just recently started getting some funny noises. I'll probably get another set when I overhaul the rest of the suspension (possibly with RCE T0s)- they aren't that expensive and worked well enough for me.

This is good to hear. I don’t care about small noises as long as my strut tower doesn’t sound like a 200 year old rocking chair when I get off the track.

If my HVT mounts can’t be rebuild, I’m gonna give these a chance

norcalpb: i wouldn't. Imho he is exception that proves the rule. For most of rest bearings started bind rather soon. Revised revisions didn't help. Modified top washer didn't help. Noises when turning wheel lock to lock are not the bad thing, those can be tolerable. What's bad, that with binding bearing that noise is made with spring turning, wearing down spring seats. Many really wanted rubber top mounts but with more camber. Many tried to make these work. Most failed, so imho not worth to try just because for just one they miraculously worked :)