oft "file not compliant"
 

trying to upload a new tune to my oft and it says file not compliant any help?

never happened before.

figured it out thanks to Shiv. great guy. buy his oft.

LOL!!

I got the same issue too, trying to upload the UEL F40C.bin but getting the "file not compliant".

Oft will only let you load roms that are the same calibration id as your stock rom

make sure your stock rom was F40C and not F00C for example

Oh I see, I have D00C. So in that case if Shiv updated any files for example "D00C" be updated? Ive seen lately he was beta testing a new UEL 91oct map.

_The "tune" for all the different rom calid is the same in oft roms and almost identical in the stock roms just minor bug fixes and changes to accomodate hardware changes in vehicle. Their is no power advantage in newer roms

however you need to use the rom calid that was originally in your car when uploading tunes to your oft

the "tune" in the oldest 400C rom is same as the latest F40C roms

the new beta test rom changes have not been released yet, but when they are all rom calid will be updated

so i used shiv's vvt angles for the jdl uel header and WOW... I cannot believe how much my car has improved. can anyone chime into as in why retarding the exhaust cam angles in the vvt tables drastically improved the fa20?

LTFT at wot are at .78 now so no need for me to mess with the MAF scaling I am however, going to mess around with base timing b any tips as in to where i can tap some more usable power? thanks guys.

oh and if you haven't changed your throttle response do it! so much easier to drive down low.

Found some extra ponies in the low load/low rpm range. Look for load up to 0.7, 1000-3000 rpm and 3400-4400. For safety, take a look at the OFT dyno plots and ignore areas, where torque already peaks. Changes in timing in small increments only!

My base map was the RON98 though, results may vary. Be careful.

Gesendet von meinem Jolla mit Tapatalk

yes I would never add lets say 10 degrees advance just cause... a couple here and there wont hurt...

When i added five degrees up top IAM dropped to .9 so I realized that adding timing in the upper rpms did absolutely nothing. Good for me to experiment, oh that and I could tell my by just listening to the motor it did not like the extra advance. Im gonna do some small increments later tonight and see what happens, for now I have been messing with throttle response.

question for you guys, VVT angles on the exhaust /intake can anyone explain exactly what happens when you advance or retard those?

5 degrees is a lot to just go adding to the tables! Go a few degrees over the knock threshold and you'll know about it. I'd never add more than 1 at a time, or set the FLKC/FBKC retard amount to pull far more timing than stock.

For the latter question, go read the AVCS thread that's floating around.

Read the thread...very good stuff... Do you know when exactly our intake and exhaust cams open up?

How do you mean open up? The info is in a pdf attached to a post early in the thread before my spreadsheet calculations for overlap etc.

I guess what degree does the intake cam and exhaust cam hit TDC their crossover point? Sorry if I'm not specific enough? I am under the impression that there is a certain degree where the intake cam is closed then opens at a certain degree of advance, then there is the cross over point and the same happens to the exhaust cam?