Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB

Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/index.php)
-   Forced Induction (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=78)
-   -   Edelbrock E-force Owner's thread and FAQs (Frequently Asked Questions) (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=93718)

waltco 10-04-2015 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigFatFlip (Post 2410224)
You are correct that there is more weight added up high, but the nice thing is, because of its location, its still mostly between the wheels (ie weight in the "middle" of the car), so at most the center of gravity is not as low, but the polar moment of inertia should be relatively the same. Other kits, like JRSC and most of the turbos, are placed way up front shifting the weight balance forward.


Car will still yaw real nice.. weight more forward would increase the car's rotating inertia, which would make it harder for the car to rotate about the vertical axis (yaw), @uspspro.

stockysnail 10-05-2015 01:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uspspro (Post 2410203)
right now... the weight is only thing that really turns me off. I know the power way more than makes up for it in terms of speed, but what about dynamics? There is 60 lb added up high in the engine bay, and 20 lb more spread out in other places.

What's the weight of the JRSC? The JRSC weight is more forward, so maybe it's not much better?

You could move the heavy battery into the trunk, get a 3lb battery instead like I did, remove the A/C, get lighter headers and other engine parts. There's a lot you can do to lose weight to balance out the gain in weight. Or you could build up the engine with forged parts and stay naturally aspirated if you're worried about adding weight. Or buy a Miata or Lotus Elise or Smart car. ;)

uspspro 10-05-2015 03:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigFatFlip (Post 2410224)
You are correct that there is more weight added up high, but the nice thing is, because of its location, its still mostly between the wheels (ie weight in the "middle" of the car), so at most the center of gravity is not as low, but the polar moment of inertia should be relatively the same. Other kits, like JRSC and most of the turbos, are placed way up front shifting the weight balance forward.

I was thinking this as well... but I also figured the JRSC is something on the order of 1/2 the weight (or less). I'm not sure how much their full kit weighs, but I had the same model Rotrex (C30-94) on my MR-S previously, and it was a pretty lightweight unit.

bfrank1972 10-05-2015 08:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uspspro (Post 2410338)
I was thinking this as well... but I also figured the JRSC is something on the order of 1/2 the weight (or less). I'm not sure how much their full kit weighs, but I had the same model Rotrex (C30-94) on my MR-S previously, and it was a pretty lightweight unit.


Correct me if I'm wrong, but the JRSC is just added weight. The 80 lbs for the eforce would be mitigated somewhat by the removal of parts (namely the intake manifold), correct?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

shiumai 10-05-2015 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bfrank1972 (Post 2410435)
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the JRSC is just added weight. The 80 lbs for the eforce would be mitigated somewhat by the removal of parts (namely the intake manifold), correct?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

that's a good point. i'm wondering how much weight is actually added vs. the weight of the unit, when all is said and done. Someone weigh all the replaced OEM parts after installation, please! :)

ATL BRZ 10-05-2015 09:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uspspro (Post 2410203)
right now... the weight is only thing that really turns me off. I know the power way more than makes up for it in terms of speed, but what about dynamics? There is 60 lb added up high in the engine bay, and 20 lb more spread out in other places.

What's the weight of the JRSC? The JRSC weight is more forward, so maybe it's not much better?

Quote:

Originally Posted by bfrank1972 (Post 2410435)
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the JRSC is just added weight. The 80 lbs for the eforce would be mitigated somewhat by the removal of parts (namely the intake manifold), correct?

Quote:

Originally Posted by shiumai (Post 2410468)
that's a good point. i'm wondering how much weight is actually added vs. the weight of the unit, when all is said and done. Someone weigh all the replaced OEM parts after installation, please! :)


So after removing the required stock stuff you don't need....

JRSC is +36.4 lbs net add

E-Force is +62.5 lbs net add

Lunatic 10-05-2015 10:50 AM

Ride in a Jackson supercharged car and a Edelbrock supercharged car and you will forget any concerns about weight. A centrifugal blower like the Jackson takes time to spool up where the "roots" type Edelbrock the power and torque is instant. I have rode in both cars and the difference is night and day.

ATL BRZ 10-05-2015 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lunatic (Post 2410534)
Ride in a Jackson supercharged car and a Edelbrock supercharged car and you will forget any concerns about weight. A centrifugal blower like the Jackson takes time to spool up where the "roots" type Edelbrock the power and torque is instant. I have rode in both cars and the difference is night and day.

The weight difference doesn't concern me much. I think most of us know what to expect with regards to the differences in power delivery between a centri and PD blower.

The difference that remains to be seen is the power sustainability/thermal management of the E-Force kit on a road course getting beat on for 30+ minutes at a time while running pump gas with or without the CARB tune. This is what the JRSC excels at even with pump gas and the other PD blowers absolutely need E85 and serious intercooling to avoid heat soaking back to 200whp with tons of timing pulled out to avoid knocking (think C7 Z06 after a few laps). Performance sustainability in harsh environments with lots of sustained high rpms is what a vocal minority of potential buyers of either kit care most about. Not everyone has access to E85 so it must be assumed that pump gas and it's inherent octane and cylinder cooling limits will be the baseline for the performance sustainability of any kit.

Also from what I've observed so far (owners groups on FB) there is some tip-in knock with the E-force kit that needs to be addressed via custom tuning. This happened with the other PD blowers too.

BigFatFlip 10-05-2015 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ATL BRZ (Post 2410632)
Also from what I've observed so far (owners groups on FB) there is some tip-in knock with the E-force kit that needs to be addressed via custom tuning. This happened with the other PD blowers too.

Not very active on FB, but can you tell me more about this "tip-in knock"?

NotSoJDM 10-05-2015 12:18 PM

Edelbrock E-force Owner's thread and FAQs (Frequently Asked Questions)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BigFatFlip (Post 2410642)
Not very active on FB, but can you tell me more about this "tip-in knock"?


I experience this intermittently with my setup.

Tip in basically refers to the transitionary period between cruise throttle and wide open throttle.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Freeman 10-05-2015 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigFatFlip (Post 2410642)
Not very active on FB, but can you tell me more about this "tip-in knock"?


From one of the FB groups.

"How is the throttle response at lower RPMs?"

"It's pretty awesome although I have some knock on tip in from 2700-3200. Likely from my header"

The owner mentions it a couple of other times.

NotSoJDM 10-05-2015 12:30 PM

Edelbrock E-force Owner's thread and FAQs (Frequently Asked Questions)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Freeman (Post 2410659)
From one of the FB groups.

"How is the throttle response at lower RPMs?"

"It's pretty awesome although I have some knock on tip in from 2700-3200. Likely from my header"

The owner mentions it a couple of other times.


That's me lol.

I am running an ACE header using their Carb tune which is designed for stock header. I am assuming that is the attributing factor. But will comment more once I get more logs.

I haven't heard any other owners chime in with similar experience. So I'm waiting for feedback from others with aftermarket headers on the carb tune to see if I'm an isolated case.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

BigFatFlip 10-05-2015 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NotSoJDM (Post 2410663)
That's me lol.

I am running an ACE header using their Carb tune which is designed for stock header. I am assuming that is the attributing factor. But will comment more once I get more logs.

Oh, this makes more sense, nothing new then? Chatting with the SC engineer during the facility tour, I asked if I would need a tune even with a aftermarket mid/over pipe. He mentioned that you would definitely need a tune even since the flow characteristics would be different.

NotSoJDM 10-05-2015 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigFatFlip (Post 2410681)
Oh, this makes more sense, nothing new then? Chatting with the SC engineer during the facility tour, I asked if I would need a tune even with a aftermarket mid/over pipe. He mentioned that you would definitely need a tune even since the flow characteristics would be different.


I have installed a handful of S/C setups from other mfgs with base tunes that weren't optimized for a catless header, yet they still run without any knock. This is why I elected to leave my ACE header on during the install.

It's too early for me to make any conclusions about what is causing my issue. I am trying to consistently reproduce the knock, and get it documented in some logs so I can review the instances where it's happening. I was hesitant to even post about it initially because I didn't want people to jump to conclusions on the Edelbrock Kit based on me running a setup that isn't what their carb tune is designed around. But ultimately I decided to make mention of it because I've been flat out asked how the cars running, and the simple answer is, not as good as it could be. But the reason can most definitely be on my end.

I will definitely keep this thread up to date as I find more out about my specific situation.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.


Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.