![]() |
Frs as mini replacement?
So my poor old mini needs replacing (2006 r53). I can't exactly trust it to get me to work on time and it's stressing me out. I went to look at new cars cars today and stumbled onto a 2014 frs manual w/ 30,000 mi for $18500. Its a tiny bit more fun to drive then the mini and a lot less practicle.
Slight problem I tested a 2016 Miata and :bow: it's in a whole new league of fun to drive (and impracticality). So how reliable is the FRS? I keep cars for the long haul and the mini has been a major dissapointment in reliability these past 10yr 110k mi. This site is giving me a bad feeling about reliability especially since there is no real long term history for the frs/brz. I was thinking with these 2 seater rwd sports cars I could hold on to the mini as a winter beater and hauler but insuring both doesn't look as cheap as I guessed. The wrx and the Mazda 3 are looking like more practical options but the Mazda isn't as fun and wrx fuel economy is terrible... Honestly I want to keep my mini but with a so far an undiagnosable issue where on rare occasions it doesn't start in the morning and Increasing demand for general repairs. (Seriously 4 power steering pumps and 3 engine mounts) I'm afraid I have no choice. |
As far as reliability goes, there's quite a handful of complaints that you can read up in the Issues section of the forums.
As for mine, with the exception of the horrid window squeak, mine hasn't developed any significant issues. |
Oh yeah I live in ct. I'm worried snow will be a major issue
|
I actually replaced my 2003 Mini S R53 with the BRZ I have now. The Mini had already had a menagerie of issues and problems (cracked head, shifter linkage snapping, coolant system issues, heater core leaks). The BRZ seems way more reliable than the mini was, as well as much more comfortable. The maintenance may be a little more involved than other cars, but blows my Mini out of the water. Kinda miss the supercharger whining its *** off... Bridgestone Blizzaks are my defense strategy against the white stuff.
|
Quote:
Winter tires. Stick to the main roads that get plowed(ploughed?) and you'll be fine. (I live in the mountains of Utah and spent two FRS winters here.) |
Practicality depends entirely on the user's needs. Honestly I find it hard to comprehend how a mini Cooper is more "practical". Lets start with what do you need out of your car, and what do you want out of your car. Do you need to seat 5 passengers? Do you need to tow a trailer or carry bikes and equipment? Or do you just need room for your lap dog and a set of track wheels to fit in your trunk on the way to a racetrack?
|
For snow in ct... I'd love a 4wd 4runner. Then it could tow a racecar in the summers too!
|
Practicality wise, the mini's hatch made it easier to fit taller things in my car, but the BRZ with the seats down is longer and wider albeit shorter cargo-wise. I get my car parts and golf clubs and suitcases in there just fine.
|
Quote:
More importantly I have a 45lb fox terrier mix that rides in the car 2-3 times a week. I think the frs can work for him ok but rear hatch entry was nice. Also do you actually recommend a different car for an only daily driver? |
One of the primary reasons I went with the BRZ rather than waiting for the ND Miata is that the BRZ can hold a full set of tires. It's pretty useful if/when you might need to transport winter/summer tires. If you don't mind tetris'ing a little, they're surprisingly practical cars.
|
Quote:
And as for dogs in the car, its a bit harder than just popping the hatch, but then again, my dog doesn't really like to get in on his own. If he was the kind to get in on his own, there wouldn't be a problem embarking on BRZ. |
These cars are fine as daily drivers, but I also have a Jeep Cherokee for when my BRZ is not fine. I think an SUV and a sports car complement each other perfectly. I wouldn't see the point in keeping the Mini, since you can buy an older SUV or small pickup for less than you're going to pay to keep the Mini running.
If it were me, I'd buy a used BRZ and look for a $1500 '97-'99 Cherokee or a sub-$2500 Tahoe as a backup/dog hauler/snow truck. But then, I can wrench on the Cherokee myself, so if you don't do your own repairs, you might not want a teenage vehicle no matter how reliable they are. |
Quote:
|
From all the stories I've heard of mini owners, the twins are like a corolla in terms of reliability compared to the mini. I've had a few issues, but nothing expensive, let alone detrimental.
|
Quote:
After 43k miles I still have confidence in my 86, but I have a high tolerance for cars that need attention at this point in my life. It's also been extremely rare that the 86 has been too impractical for me and I had to resort to borrowing a truck or sedan/wagon. Worst case is going out to lunch I can really only drive one other person. Miata is probably safer on the reliability front as the FA20 is still relatively unproven but the SkyActiv 2.0L has been on the road since '12 in the Mazda3 and other models since, many more miles racked up on those. I won't pretend to know anything about snow. Good luck, keep test driving. Worth noting that the new WRX's fuel economy is not significantly lower than the 86 (24 vs 25 combined), the Miata's and Mazda3's is much better (30+). |
Quote:
|
Quote:
my dad drives a nismo 370z yet refuses to mod it. :mad0260: |
Quote:
|
I'm one of the unlucky owners who had almost all the problems this car has. My car probably sat in the dealer for total of 2 months. A few days here and a few days there, for so many number of times. But all of these issues were minor and the car was drive-able. I could schedule each appointment weeks away and I could keep driving the car meanwhile. And every time I get in to the loaner car, I get to know how good this car is. As far as getting you to work reliably, this car will get you to. And the car you're looking at is 2014 model. It should have most of the problems taken care of at the factory by that time. So, you probably won't have any problem with it. 2015/2016 WRX fuel economy is not that much worse than FR-S. My friend has '15 WRX and we drive similar way. He gets only 2 mpg less than I do. Unless you're talking about '14 and earlier.
|
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Aftermarket support is really sparse, he needs camber bad for it to be competitive but only KW and Bilstein sell camber plates and they have to be paired with their clubsport packages nobody else (well maybe like BC and St), and wheel clearance is tough to go over 7" wide. Even though the same engine goes into the JCW and other BMWs at 230+ hp nobody really has good power upgrades for it yet, a couple piggybacks exist and some guys will hack up your ecu but it's nowhere near as well developed as the 86s aftermarket. |
Quote:
How I think I look: https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com...3733dd1dee.jpg How I really look: https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/i...aRJvcfIEicu5-b |
Quote:
I also fit an ice hockey bag in the trunk just fine, sticks have to ride in the cabin though. With the seats down I fit two wakeboards and gear along with luggage just fine. |
Quote:
|
I'm in central Massachusetts...get some good snows and drive like you're not an idiot and you'll be fine. Or drive like an idiot and really have some fun. :) As far as practicality is concerned, the Mini has it beat, but in reality, how often are you trying to max out your car in terms of cargo? I'm not doing that very frequently, so the trade off is worth it for me. On that note, with the back seat down, I was able to get the entire cat-back exhaust system for a Jeep Liberty in my FRS, all in one piece. The guys at the dealer couldn't believe it, and frankly, I was pretty shocked and pleased as well. lol
|
Quote:
I don't get out much. |
Quote:
Those are two activities I'd never figure would go into the same thought. Where is this magical place that let's you have your cake and eat it, too? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
I keep forgetting the manual frs gets so much worse mpg
22/30 man vs 25/34 auto.. Wrx is 20/27 I'm considering the frs a small drop from the mini which now that I check has been down graded to 22/29. I swear it was ?/32 when I bought it. I know they've messed with the rating system some over the decades just didn't know how much... My old 92 celica is now 19/26 and was rated ?/30 I'd regularly get 32 on a tank... Anyway somehow <30mpg hwy. seems objectionable like an fu environment Also people forget about the Mazda speed 3 because they stopped making them in 2013. The 2016. 2.5L 3 was very nice but it was lacking the joy of the mx5 and the mini. I have to admit the frs is great to drive but it could use more joy too. It's a bit too serious. |
I think I might have to see what I can get for the mini in trade and also if they'll knock a bit off asking price so I can get some snow tires. Do you have to spend $250 on tire pressure sensors for your winter wheels?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I dont like listening to those ratings, i regularly get 25 in the city and while being really aggressive, and 34 to 37 on my 3hr highway trip over the mountains in PA Sent from my Glade Air Freshener |
TL;DR Subaru and Toyota make a good quality car. I have full faith in the longevity of my FRS. You'll hear a lot of complaints on this forum because that's where people talk about problems. People never post about not having any problems. Also I haven't heard of any serious issues plaguing the chassis. The crickets and window squeaks shouldn't make or break it for you IMO
|
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Quote:
Here's a pic of it on the ground tonight on the 16" stock wheels, forgot to snap a pic of the 18's, cool looking car. I get why people bitch that it got bigger, but c'est la vie. Apologies for the terrible cell phone quality on the garage shot, some other shots to make up for it. Really what I'm trying to do is convince OP to buy another Mini so that 86's stay low production. :bonk: http://i.imgur.com/rSLr2R8.jpg http://i.imgur.com/lEpuhWf.jpg |
Quote:
My test drive scale of driving joy Highest to lowest 2016 Mx-5 (by a massive margin) 2016 Wrx '06 cooper s 2014 Frs 2016 cooper s 2016 Mazda 3 2015 Golf (DSG auto) 2013 beetle turbo 2015 Kia Optima 2015 GTI ( hated the clutch) 2015 mustang ecoboost (looks alone make me still want one) 201? Challenger v6 auto rental (way better then expected) 2016 Impreza & Crosstrek 2013 MKZ 2015 renegade (Assume manual unless otherwise stated.) its a pretty tight pack between Mazda 3 and the impreza. A lot of good cars on the market now |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Sure the twins would be more fun on a twisty mountain road but 90% of my driving is through suburbs or on the highway where i think the wrx has the edge. I'm not trashing the frs it's awesome but it's a bit more specialized. Performance doesn't always equal fun and fun doesn't always equal performance |
I got rid of my R56 for a brz, I regret it almost everyday.
Maybe if the brz wasn't a daily driver. |
1. Test drive a Fiat 500 Abarth.
2. Test drive a Ford Fiesta ST. 3. The Mini has awful reliability. The FRS and BRZ are OK for the small stuff and good overall. The crickets are the main reason people complain. There were early problems with the early tunes and injector seals. That's long over. Most people running into engine failures are also running engine mods, doing track days, or running low on oil after filling at Jiffy Lube or getting improper repairs after accidents. Let's be honest: most people beat on these cars. Not so many middle-aged women driving them as commuters. I have not driven the new Miata. I have flirted with Miatas for years, but I could never take one to bed. The FR-S and I went all the way on our first date. The GTI clutch is great. I don't know why it was bad for you. The GTI DSG deserves a try. You could always get a Golf R and have AWD. The WRX and STI sound perfect for you. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:00 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.