Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB

Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/index.php)
-   Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=24)
-   -   michelin pilot super sports on wedssport sa-10r 18" (https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=84855)

steveholt 03-17-2015 03:26 PM

michelin pilot super sports on wedssport sa-10r 18"
 
I am trying to decide on 235x35 or 245x35 for either a 18x8.5 or 18x9.5 wedssport sa-10r wheels.

which would be a better fit for either the 18x8.5 or 18x9.5?
i'd imagine 40 or 45 would be too much tire or too meaty?
I'd prefer to NOT have the tire stretched or have TOO much tire on the wheel if possible

this would be my daily driver and I am planning on having a dedicated track set of wheels/tires w/o tpms.

I'm a bit of a novice when it comes to all the equipment stuff and am trying to learn everyday so I had some additional questions.

going +1 on my wheels to 18" from the stock 17" will this affect or increase my ground clearance in any way since the wheel/tire diameter is technically larger?

if so, is this the reason why individuals lower their cars to minimize wheel gap? and to make it look better?

question about offset, is it best to keep it close to the stock offset of 48 as possible? the lower the offset number would mean that the tire will stick out more?
being that i am interested in either a 8.5 or 9.5 width for my wheel which is higher than the stock 7 width, i'd imagine keeping it as close to the 48 stock offset would be best to not have the wheel poke out?
the diameter of the wheel doesn't play to the offset as much as it would the width correct?

final question, i plan on running the above setup with everything stock for the time being, will i run into any adverse issues with the car in terms of functionality and reliability? tire wear, wheel/tire rubbing..etc?


thank you everyone in advance, again i am a bit of a novice and trying to learn the best I can.

Bergen23 03-17-2015 03:36 PM

This is all I have to add here:

STEVE HOLT!

http://images2.fanpop.com/images/pho...9-1280-720.jpg

steveholt 03-17-2015 03:40 PM

steve holt!

LucidMomentum 03-17-2015 03:52 PM

The car in my sig is running 225 A/S 3s on 18x8.5 wheels, for reference. I think 45s would be pushing it a bit much.

continuecrushing 03-17-2015 04:52 PM

gearing reasons alone you should avoid 235/40 or 245/40 tires

offset is totally dependent upon wheel width. There is a balance factor here.

for 18x8.5 or 18x9.5 you probably need between +38 and +40.

+48 is too much

Lowering the car will help reduce the wheel gap.

You wont have any weird tire wear just from swapping wheels/tires.

steveholt 03-17-2015 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shutter (Post 2172834)
gearing reasons alone you should avoid 235/40 or 245/40 tires

offset is totally dependent upon wheel width. There is a balance factor here.

for 18x8.5 or 18x9.5 you probably need between +38 and +40.

+48 is too much

Lowering the car will help reduce the wheel gap.

You wont have any weird tire wear just from swapping wheels/tires.

Would 45 offset be ok? Or would that sit too far in and rub? Both wheels are offered in 45 offset.


What would an appropriate tire size be for either of the wheels I'm looking at?
I'm looking at the Michelin pilot super sports in 18.

Would 235x35 or 245x35 be ok compared to the 235x40 / 245x40 you wouldn't recommend due to gearing reasons?

continuecrushing 03-17-2015 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by steveholt (Post 2172873)
Would 45 offset be ok? Or would that sit too far in and rub? Both wheels are offered in 45 offset.


What would an appropriate tire size be for either of the wheels I'm looking at?
I'm looking at the Michelin pilot super sports in 18.

Would 235x35 or 245x35 be ok compared to the 235x40 / 245x40 you wouldn't recommend due to gearing reasons?

+45 might be a bit much for 9.5 on stock suspension. I had 18x9 +40 for a while, and it was REAL close to the strut.

235/35 or 245/35 will work. 245/40/18 could work but gearing will be raised(not good, since our car is slow to begin with) and it might rub when turning wheel all the way left/right.

I had 245/40/18 on 18x9 +40 for a while, and it worked just fine...but ymmv. If I did it over, I would just buy proper size from the start (235 or 245 with 35 sidewall)

DAEMANO 03-17-2015 05:51 PM

I think I can help, maybe a lot. I spent A TON of time (months) choosing these wheels and tires. My factors and goals were the following. Since I'm at work (on lunch) I can't get into as much detail as I would like, but I can tell you my factors and thoughts. I chose to pay special attention to the following.

I run WedsSports SA10-Rs in 18x8.5x45 with 235/40/18 Dunlop Direzza DZ102s on RS*R Sports-i s dropped -1.6" . I run about -2.7 camber in the front and -2.2 in the rear. After install I wanted a more flush look so I added extended studs and 15mm H&R alloy spacers (which are hubcentric and very light weight). If Weds offered the same wheel in a lower offset I would have bought those.


Performance
"European" feel that increased the limits of the stock setup without gaining so much traction that the car was no longer fun on the street.

Comfort
Improved comfort that could work with either the stock suspension or an aftermarket suspension on California's notoriously horrible roads. For this reason I chose 8.5" square wheels that could fit in the front with no clearance issues at full lock. My concern was that 9.5" wide wheels in the front wouldn't clear it.

Budget
Wheel - No more than $400 per wheel (spent about $300 ea.)
Tire - No more than $150 per tire (spent about $125 ea.)
Mounting balancing and lifetime rotations - $100
Alignment - $125 @Lang Racing - Irvine, CA

Tire compound - Newer technologies had to be in there, this nixed many older tires. The Dunlop Direzza DZ102 was a new design for April 2014.
Speed rating - Z speed rated was not necessary for my goals
Tread design - Needed to allot for tire rotation as well as have decent should blocks for at the limit grip. This DQ'd a lot of tires.
Tire weight - Big heavy tires add weight at the place where you don't want it at the edge of the rolling stock.
Tread pattern width - Because I was going with slightly taller tires, the tread width needed to be <= the wheel width (8.5"). Importantly it's been noted that on the track anything wider than 225 starts to see diminishing returns on this car. For AutoX, you want as wide and sticky as you can get and this generally means a seperate set of AutoX duty wheels.
Tire dry feel - In SoCal pure summer tires are generally ok, but they also raise the limits of the car so high that the car would lose some of it's playfulness at lower speeds. Initial bite couldn't be shark like. So this ruled out Michelin PSS, Hankook RS3, Dunlop ZII, and RE-11s
Wheel weight - For 18" they needed to be at or less than OEM. The 8.5 wide version accomplished this. The 9.5 does not (IIRC).
Wheel width - 9.5 wouldn't fit in the front under the stock suspension. Even though I changed the coils, I wanted the flexibility just in case I had to send a coilover in for rebuild because this is my DD.
Wheel mfg technique - Flow formed wheels seem to offer the best of both worlds (lower cast-type cost, with higher forgedesque strength and failure characteristics (bending instead of cracking)) FOR THE PRICE. Yes purely forged wheels are stronger, but the cost was just too high for a car that wasn't going to see the track that often. Also, Weds are a brand I've seen reliably tracked and currently Michele Abbatte is using the exact same wheel (SA10-R) on her NASA car which she beats on.
Overall rolling circumference - I am ok to raise the gearing slightly by slightly increasing the rolling circ to gain more sidewall and thus street comfort. No rubber bands here, but also they don't look "meaty". The are slightly tucked under the fender so it would be hard to tell that they are slightly taller (9mm) than the stock circumference.


Here are pics of the car from today (mostly)

Album link - 8 pics
http://imgur.com/a/ue2Zv

With 15mm spacers and 1.6" drop
http://i.imgur.com/1BRY2F1.jpg?1

Without 15mm spacers and 1.25" drop

http://i.imgur.com/ALzyV4Y.jpg?2

steveholt 03-17-2015 07:21 PM

Ps how much would my mpg or fuel economy be affected by going +1 , it would decrease ?

steveholt 03-17-2015 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shutter (Post 2172913)
+45 might be a bit much for 9.5 on stock suspension. I had 18x9 +40 for a while, and it was REAL close to the strut.

235/35 or 245/35 will work. 245/40/18 could work but gearing will be raised(not good, since our car is slow to begin with) and it might rub when turning wheel all the way left/right.

I had 245/40/18 on 18x9 +40 for a while, and it worked just fine...but ymmv. If I did it over, I would just buy proper size from the start (235 or 245 with 35 sidewall)

I think I'm gonna go 18x8.5 all around since I plan on staying stock
I should be ok with 18x8.5 stock and not have risks of rubbing and what not?

continuecrushing 03-17-2015 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by steveholt (Post 2173051)
Ps how much would my mpg or fuel economy be affected by going +1 , it would decrease ?

with wider, sticky tires you'll probably go down 1-3mpg or so. If you want, I can find my fuelly, and you can see the mpg I had from stock to 18's. It wont really be all that noticeable, though.

Quote:

Originally Posted by steveholt (Post 2173057)
I think I'm gonna go 18x8.5 all around since I plan on staying stock
I should be ok with 18x8.5 stock and not have risks of rubbing and what not?

18x8.5 with the proper tire should be good with no rubbing.

steveholt 03-17-2015 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DAEMANO (Post 2172917)
I think I can help, maybe a lot. I spent A TON of time (months) choosing these wheels and tires. My factors and goals were the following. Since I'm at work (on lunch) I can't get into as much detail as I would like, but I can tell you my factors and thoughts. I chose to pay special attention to the following.

I run WedsSports SA10-Rs in 18x8.5x45 with 235/40/18 Dunlop Direzza DZ102s on RS*R Sports-i s dropped -1.6" . I run about -2.7 camber in the front and -2.2 in the rear. After install I wanted a more flush look so I added extended studs and 15mm H&R alloy spacers (which are hubcentric and very light weight). If Weds offered the same wheel in a lower offset I would have bought those.


Performance
"European" feel that increased the limits of the stock setup without gaining so much traction that the car was no longer fun on the street.

Comfort
Improved comfort that could work with either the stock suspension or an aftermarket suspension on California's notoriously horrible roads. For this reason I chose 8.5" square wheels that could fit in the front with no clearance issues at full lock. My concern was that 9.5" wide wheels in the front wouldn't clear it.

Budget
Wheel - No more than $400 per wheel (spent about $300 ea.)
Tire - No more than $150 per tire (spent about $125 ea.)
Mounting balancing and lifetime rotations - $100
Alignment - $125 @Lang Racing - Irvine, CA

Tire compound - Newer technologies had to be in there, this nixed many older tires. The Dunlop Direzza DZ102 was a new design for April 2014.
Speed rating - Z speed rated was not necessary for my goals
Tread design - Needed to allot for tire rotation as well as have decent should blocks for at the limit grip. This DQ'd a lot of tires.
Tire weight - Big heavy tires add weight at the place where you don't want it at the edge of the rolling stock.
Tread pattern width - Because I was going with slightly taller tires, the tread width needed to be <= the wheel width (8.5"). Importantly it's been noted that on the track anything wider than 225 starts to see diminishing returns on this car. For AutoX, you want as wide and sticky as you can get and this generally means a seperate set of AutoX duty wheels.
Tire dry feel - In SoCal pure summer tires are generally ok, but they also raise the limits of the car so high that the car would lose some of it's playfulness at lower speeds. Initial bite couldn't be shark like. So this ruled out Michelin PSS, Hankook RS3, Dunlop ZII, and RE-11s
Wheel weight - For 18" they needed to be at or less than OEM. The 8.5 wide version accomplished this. The 9.5 does not (IIRC).
Wheel width - 9.5 wouldn't fit in the front under the stock suspension. Even though I changed the coils, I wanted the flexibility just in case I had to send a coilover in for rebuild because this is my DD.
Wheel mfg technique - Flow formed wheels seem to offer the best of both worlds (lower cast-type cost, with higher forgedesque strength and failure characteristics (bending instead of cracking)) FOR THE PRICE. Yes purely forged wheels are stronger, but the cost was just too high for a car that wasn't going to see the track that often. Also, Weds are a brand I've seen reliably tracked and currently Michele Abbatte is using the exact same wheel (SA10-R) on her NASA car which she beats on.
Overall rolling circumference - I am ok to raise the gearing slightly by slightly increasing the rolling circ to gain more sidewall and thus street comfort. No rubber bands here, but also they don't look "meaty". The are slightly tucked under the fender so it would be hard to tell that they are slightly taller (9mm) than the stock circumference.


Here are pics of the car from today (mostly)

Album link - 8 pics
http://imgur.com/a/ue2Zv

With 15mm spacers and 1.6" drop
http://i.imgur.com/1BRY2F1.jpg?1

Without 15mm spacers and 1.25" drop

http://i.imgur.com/ALzyV4Y.jpg?2

Thank you very much for this post! I've decided on 18x8.5 now. Now for tires...

Ps - are wheel alignments required each time a new set of wheels and tires are put on? My car has about 2200 miles so far and I'm the first and only owner

DAEMANO 03-17-2015 08:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by steveholt (Post 2173141)
Thank you very much for this post! I've decided on 18x8.5 now. Now for tires...

Ps - are wheel alignments required each time a new set of wheels and tires are put on? My car has about 2200 miles so far and I'm the first and only owner

No problem. I'm very happy with the decision to go 8.5, even though the 9.5s are more concave. Mine are lighter, and can be rotated. Big plusses in my book.

You won't have to align just for wheels and tires. I got mine aligned because I added camber bolts, then again later when I added coilovers.

steveholt 03-17-2015 08:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shutter (Post 2173099)
with wider, sticky tires you'll probably go down 1-3mpg or so. If you want, I can find my fuelly, and you can see the mpg I had from stock to 18's. It wont really be all that noticeable, though.



18x8.5 with the proper tire should be good with no rubbing.

If you can post the fuel stats that would be greatly appreciated

Thank tou

steveholt 03-17-2015 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DAEMANO (Post 2173172)
No problem. I'm very happy with the decision to go 8.5, even though the 9.5s are more concave. Mine are lighter, and can be rotated. Big plusses in my book.

You won't have to align just for wheels and tires. I got mine aligned because I added camber bolts, then again later when I added coilovers.

I see, so if I'm keeping my suspension and all else stock then there is really no point in checking alignment outside of maybe if I got into a car accident, drove over a curb hard or noticed some irregular things such as vibration or the steering being off centered?

continuecrushing 03-17-2015 08:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by steveholt (Post 2173200)
If you can post the fuel stats that would be greatly appreciated

Thank tou

give me a min

Quote:

Originally Posted by steveholt (Post 2173201)
I see, so if I'm keeping my suspension and all else stock then there is really no point in checking alignment outside of maybe if I got into a car accident, drove over a curb hard or noticed some irregular things such as vibration or the steering being off centered?

correct. Its still a good idea to get alignment checked every once in a while, but otherwise it should stay pretty close to the same.

You need an alignment if:
1. Hit something
2. Remove/swap suspension components(sway bars/strut bars do not count)
3. Raise/lower your car
4.Weird tire wear
5. Other stuff I forgot...but this is most of it

continuecrushing 03-17-2015 08:37 PM

http://badges.fuelly.com/images/sig-us/297553.png


This should show you...I have notes for most things/all. Anything low 20's is on e85, but I'll say it in notes.

Also, I thought I had more fill-ups in there, but the numbers there are pretty average for me. I used to track fuel in excel, but switched over to fuelly and haven't moved all my fillups over.

steveholt 03-18-2015 12:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shutter (Post 2173210)
http://badges.fuelly.com/images/sig-us/297553.png


This should show you...I have notes for most things/all. Anything low 20's is on e85, but I'll say it in notes.

Also, I thought I had more fill-ups in there, but the numbers there are pretty average for me. I used to track fuel in excel, but switched over to fuelly and haven't moved all my fillups over.

Thank you!

calmtigers 03-18-2015 12:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DAEMANO (Post 2173172)
No problem. I'm very happy with the decision to go 8.5, even though the 9.5s are more concave. Mine are lighter, and can be rotated. Big plusses in my book.

You won't have to align just for wheels and tires. I got mine aligned because I added camber bolts, then again later when I added coilovers.

Hey thanks for the info, was wondering if you ever got an exact weight? only thing i'm waiting on to lock down the right set of wheels!

nzer 03-18-2015 04:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by calmtigers (Post 2173539)
Hey thanks for the info, was wondering if you ever got an exact weight? only thing i'm waiting on to lock down the right set of wheels!

Weights of the Weds SA10R are here
http://www.wedssport.jp/spectable/sa10r.pdf

18x8.5" = 8.86kg
18x9.5" = 9.27kg

If you're going for weight savings there's lighter options around.

I have the Wedssport SA10R in 18x9.5" +45 all around (I have coil overs) with 255/35/18 tyres. They are my show wheels due to the weight and I have TRD 18x7.5" +46 at 7.5kg each for track or my TWS T66-F in 18x9" +44 at only 7.10kg each.

My setup with SA10R 9.5" is here with 255 tyres.
http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=83798

calmtigers 03-19-2015 01:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nzer (Post 2173690)
Weights of the Weds SA10R are here
http://www.wedssport.jp/spectable/sa10r.pdf

18x8.5" = 8.86kg
18x9.5" = 9.27kg

If you're going for weight savings there's lighter options around.

I have the Wedssport SA10R in 18x9.5" +45 all around (I have coil overs) with 255/35/18 tyres. They are my show wheels due to the weight and I have TRD 18x7.5" +46 at 7.5kg each for track or my TWS T66-F in 18x9" +44 at only 7.10kg each.

My setup with SA10R 9.5" is here with 255 tyres.
http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=83798

Thanks man! Sadly have to pick one wheel for everything, still shopping around though

nzer 03-19-2015 04:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by calmtigers (Post 2175332)
Thanks man! Sadly have to pick one wheel for everything, still shopping around though

Everyone will have a different opinion but for all round that will be good on track and look good on road I'd go 18x8.5" +35 with car lowered about an inch.

Would be pretty flush and be wide enough to look good but no rubbing and you should be able to get light enough to still be good on track.

Or, if you want narrower but would look fatter as flush I'd go around 18x7.5" +21 or so. Again, lowered about an inch.

My opinion only but I like flush with not too much if any poke.

steveholt 04-02-2015 11:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shutter (Post 2173099)
with wider, sticky tires you'll probably go down 1-3mpg or so. If you want, I can find my fuelly, and you can see the mpg I had from stock to 18's. It wont really be all that noticeable, though.



18x8.5 with the proper tire should be good with no rubbing.

I ended up going square set of 18x8.5 +45 on Michelin pss 245x35x18

I should be good to go with no rubbing or risks of rubbing with this setup on everything stock correct?

continuecrushing 04-03-2015 03:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by steveholt (Post 2197322)
I ended up going square set of 18x8.5 +45 on Michelin pss 245x35x18

I should be good to go with no rubbing or risks of rubbing with this setup on everything stock correct?

should be good!

DAEMANO 04-03-2015 03:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by steveholt (Post 2197322)
I ended up going square set of 18x8.5 +45 on Michelin pss 245x35x18

I should be good to go with no rubbing or risks of rubbing with this setup on everything stock correct?

Agreed with @Shutter , you're good to go.

steveholt 04-03-2015 04:08 AM

thanks guys.

i've never dealt with rubbing before, what are symptoms of it when driving hard or casual driving? is it subtle or is it very noticeable if it occurs?

steveholt 04-10-2015 04:05 AM

so there is no fender rubbing, but it seems like a very tight fit for the inside. Not really sure how to tell if i get rubbing on the inside.

when the installer put on the wheel just for a test fit, the clearance on the inside was really really tight... I haven't turned the left/right lockout out of fear of rubbing...

topwise for clearance it looks like i have plenty of room on stock height, not really sure how to test for rubbing on the inside though

i think i might be rubbing on the inside against the coils/struts?

DAEMANO 04-10-2015 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by steveholt (Post 2207231)
so there is no fender rubbing, but it seems like a very tight fit for the inside. Not really sure how to tell if i get rubbing on the inside.

when the installer put on the wheel just for a test fit, the clearance on the inside was really really tight... I haven't turned the left/right lockout out of fear of rubbing...

topwise for clearance it looks like i have plenty of room on stock height, not really sure how to test for rubbing on the inside though

i think i might be rubbing on the inside against the coils/struts?


Do you think its rubbing in the front or the rear? You should be clear on both with the specs mentioned above.

steveholt 04-10-2015 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DAEMANO (Post 2207459)
Do you think its rubbing in the front or the rear? You should be clear on both with the specs mentioned above.

Front when turning closer to all the way lockout

steveholt 04-10-2015 07:28 PM

Maybe it's just in my head because from what I saw when the installer showed me there was only a tiny bit of clearance when he carefully mounted the wheel onto the Hub just as a test fit...

I'm not really sure what to look for and with my exhaust it makes it hard to sense rubbing if its based on hearing things

DAEMANO 04-10-2015 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by steveholt (Post 2208151)
Maybe it's just in my head because from what I saw when the installer showed me there was only a tiny bit of clearance when he carefully mounted the wheel onto the Hub just as a test fit...

I'm not really sure what to look for and with my exhaust it makes it hard to sense rubbing if its based on hearing things

Personally, I doubt it's rubbing at all. Your tires aren't wide enough at 245 and aren't tall enough at 35 to catch the liner. Your wheels aren't wide enough at 8.5" to catch the stock spring perch. You're probably right, it's in your head. Still check it out anyhow for peace of mind.

So the easiest way to know is to listen for it. Rubbing will generally be kind of obvious because it will be a grinding sort of noise that changes with the speed of the rotation of the wheel.

The other way is to inspect the inside of your plastic fender liners after about 100 miles of driving, you will see a spot in the plastic that looks marred in the direction of the wheels rotation (think of a pencil eraser that's only been used on one side, it gets rubbed flat on that side, the mar would look kind of like that, flat and smooth).

steveholt 04-10-2015 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DAEMANO (Post 2208155)
Personally, I doubt it's rubbing at all. Your tires aren't wide enough at 245 and aren't tall enough at 35 to catch the liner. Your wheels aren't wide enough at 8.5" to catch the stock spring perch. You're probably right, it's in your head. Still check it out anyhow for peace of mind.

So the easiest way to know is to listen for it. Rubbing will generally be kind of obvious because it will be a grinding sort of noise that changes with the speed of the rotation of the wheel.

The other way is to inspect the inside of your plastic fender liners after about 100 miles of driving, you will see a spot in the plastic that looks marred in the direction of the wheels rotation (think of a pencil eraser that's only been used on one side, it gets rubbed flat on that side, the mar would look kind of like that, flat and smooth).

Thank you for this detailed reply, it is a bit reassuring after having read all of it

ARTBRZ 01-09-2016 10:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DAEMANO (Post 2172917)
I think I can help, maybe a lot. I spent A TON of time (months) choosing these wheels and tires. My factors and goals were the following. Since I'm at work (on lunch) I can't get into as much detail as I would like, but I can tell you my factors and thoughts. I chose to pay special attention to the following.

I run WedsSports SA10-Rs in 18x8.5x45 with 235/40/18 Dunlop Direzza DZ102s on RS*R Sports-i s dropped -1.6" . I run about -2.7 camber in the front and -2.2 in the rear. After install I wanted a more flush look so I added extended studs and 15mm H&R alloy spacers (which are hubcentric and very light weight). If Weds offered the same wheel in a lower offset I would have bought those.


Performance
"European" feel that increased the limits of the stock setup without gaining so much traction that the car was no longer fun on the street.

Comfort
Improved comfort that could work with either the stock suspension or an aftermarket suspension on California's notoriously horrible roads. For this reason I chose 8.5" square wheels that could fit in the front with no clearance issues at full lock. My concern was that 9.5" wide wheels in the front wouldn't clear it.

Budget
Wheel - No more than $400 per wheel (spent about $300 ea.)
Tire - No more than $150 per tire (spent about $125 ea.)
Mounting balancing and lifetime rotations - $100
Alignment - $125 @Lang Racing - Irvine, CA

Tire compound - Newer technologies had to be in there, this nixed many older tires. The Dunlop Direzza DZ102 was a new design for April 2014.
Speed rating - Z speed rated was not necessary for my goals
Tread design - Needed to allot for tire rotation as well as have decent should blocks for at the limit grip. This DQ'd a lot of tires.
Tire weight - Big heavy tires add weight at the place where you don't want it at the edge of the rolling stock.
Tread pattern width - Because I was going with slightly taller tires, the tread width needed to be <= the wheel width (8.5"). Importantly it's been noted that on the track anything wider than 225 starts to see diminishing returns on this car. For AutoX, you want as wide and sticky as you can get and this generally means a seperate set of AutoX duty wheels.
Tire dry feel - In SoCal pure summer tires are generally ok, but they also raise the limits of the car so high that the car would lose some of it's playfulness at lower speeds. Initial bite couldn't be shark like. So this ruled out Michelin PSS, Hankook RS3, Dunlop ZII, and RE-11s
Wheel weight - For 18" they needed to be at or less than OEM. The 8.5 wide version accomplished this. The 9.5 does not (IIRC).
Wheel width - 9.5 wouldn't fit in the front under the stock suspension. Even though I changed the coils, I wanted the flexibility just in case I had to send a coilover in for rebuild because this is my DD.
Wheel mfg technique - Flow formed wheels seem to offer the best of both worlds (lower cast-type cost, with higher forgedesque strength and failure characteristics (bending instead of cracking)) FOR THE PRICE. Yes purely forged wheels are stronger, but the cost was just too high for a car that wasn't going to see the track that often. Also, Weds are a brand I've seen reliably tracked and currently Michele Abbatte is using the exact same wheel (SA10-R) on her NASA car which she beats on.
Overall rolling circumference - I am ok to raise the gearing slightly by slightly increasing the rolling circ to gain more sidewall and thus street comfort. No rubber bands here, but also they don't look "meaty". The are slightly tucked under the fender so it would be hard to tell that they are slightly taller (9mm) than the stock circumference.


Here are pics of the car from today (mostly)

Album link - 8 pics
http://imgur.com/a/ue2Zv

With 15mm spacers and 1.6" drop
http://i.imgur.com/1BRY2F1.jpg?1

Without 15mm spacers and 1.25" drop

http://i.imgur.com/ALzyV4Y.jpg?2

Thank you for this post. Great information. I bought the same wheels and dimensions because of your post. My set up is a little different. I will doing a 15mm drop instead of 1.6 inch.

I wanted to also make it flush with the fender. Is the extended bolts necessary for the 15mm spacers?

DAEMANO 01-10-2016 11:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ARTBRZ (Post 2504113)
Thank you for this post. Great information. I bought the same wheels and dimensions because of your post. My set up is a little different. I will doing a 15mm drop instead of 1.6 inch.

I wanted to also make it flush with the fender. Is the extended bolts necessary for the 15mm spacers?

Yes, you'll need extended studs. I have the H&R track+ 15mm kit in the front (with H&R 50mm studs) and ARP 60mm extended studs with 15mm H&R spacers in the rear.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:27 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.


Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.